| Literature DB >> 34992311 |
Luyao Peng1,2, Sandip Sinharay3.
Abstract
Wollack et al. (2015) suggested the erasure detection index (EDI) for detecting fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) extended the index of Wollack et al. (2015) to suggest three EDIs for detecting fraudulent erasures at the aggregate or group level. This article follows up on the research of Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) and suggests a new aggregate-level EDI by incorporating the empirical best linear unbiased predictor from the literature of linear mixed-effects models (e.g., McCulloch et al., 2008). A simulation study shows that the new EDI has larger power than the indices of Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018). In addition, the new index has satisfactory Type I error rates. A real data example is also included.Entities:
Keywords: data forensics; empirical best linear unbiased predictor; erasure analysis; linear mixed-effects model; test fraud
Year: 2021 PMID: 34992311 PMCID: PMC8725052 DOI: 10.1177/0013164421994893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Educ Psychol Meas ISSN: 0013-1644 Impact factor: 2.821