BACKGROUND: Flexor tendon lacerations in the fingers are challenging injuries that can be repaired using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique or under traditional anesthesia (TA). The purpose of our study was to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair under WALANT versus TA. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary flexor tendon repair in zone I and II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record and compare patient demographics, range of motion, functional outcomes, complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: Sixty-five zone I (N = 21) or II (N = 44) flexor tendon repairs were included in the final analysis: 23 WALANT and 42 TA. There were no statistical differences in mean age, length of follow-up, proportion of injured digits, or zone of injury between the groups. The final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the WALANT group was 17.2 (SD: 14.4) versus 23.3 (SD: 18.5) in the TA group. There were no statistical differences between the groups with any final range of motion (ROM) parameters, grip strength, or Visual Analog Scale pain scores at the final follow-up. The WALANT group was found to have a slightly higher reoperation rate (26.1% vs 7.1%; P = .034) than the TA group. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first clinical studies reporting outcomes of flexor tendon repairs performed under WALANT. Overall, we found no difference in rupture rates, ROM, and functional outcomes following zone I and II flexor tendon repairs when performed under WALANT versus TA.
BACKGROUND: Flexor tendon lacerations in the fingers are challenging injuries that can be repaired using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique or under traditional anesthesia (TA). The purpose of our study was to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair under WALANT versus TA. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary flexor tendon repair in zone I and II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record and compare patient demographics, range of motion, functional outcomes, complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: Sixty-five zone I (N = 21) or II (N = 44) flexor tendon repairs were included in the final analysis: 23 WALANT and 42 TA. There were no statistical differences in mean age, length of follow-up, proportion of injured digits, or zone of injury between the groups. The final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the WALANT group was 17.2 (SD: 14.4) versus 23.3 (SD: 18.5) in the TA group. There were no statistical differences between the groups with any final range of motion (ROM) parameters, grip strength, or Visual Analog Scale pain scores at the final follow-up. The WALANT group was found to have a slightly higher reoperation rate (26.1% vs 7.1%; P = .034) than the TA group. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first clinical studies reporting outcomes of flexor tendon repairs performed under WALANT. Overall, we found no difference in rupture rates, ROM, and functional outcomes following zone I and II flexor tendon repairs when performed under WALANT versus TA.