Literature DB >> 34988905

Finding meaning in "wrong responses": The multiple object-awareness paradigm shows that visual awareness is probabilistic.

Chunye Fu1, Yong Lyu2.   

Abstract

Visual information that observers perceive and remember at any given moment guides behavior in daily life. However, binary alternative-forced choice responses, often used in visual research, limit the report of the visual information that observers perceive and remember. We used a new multiple object-awareness paradigm where observers can use multiple clicks to find a target. We calculated visual awareness capacity based on the first-attempt accuracy and the total number of clicks, respectively. Results showed that the capacity estimated by the clicks in guessing from N was significantly greater than that estimated by the first-attempt accuracy. Further, analysis found that if observers could not locate the target in their first attempt, they were more likely to click closer to the target or on stimuli that matched its color. In addition, we found that even when observers used the same number of clicks to find a target (2 or 3), the average distance was shorter when observers reported high-level subjective visibility. The findings are compatible with the partial awareness hypothesis, and the visual ensembles and summary statistics hypothesis, which hold that visual awareness is probabilistic. These results also support the visual short-term memory models where many items are stored but with a resolution or noise level that depends on the number of items in memory.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple object awareness; Probabilism; Visual awareness; Visual short-term memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34988905     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02398-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  27 in total

1.  How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis.

Authors:  Sid Kouider; Vincent de Gardelle; Jérôme Sackur; Emmanuel Dupoux
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Consciousness isn't all-or-none: Evidence for partial awareness during the attentional blink.

Authors:  James C Elliott; Benjamin Baird; Barry Giesbrecht
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-01-05

3.  Consciousness cannot be separated from function.

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel C Dennett
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  What Is the True Capacity of Visual Cognition?

Authors:  Michael A Cohen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Large Capacity of Conscious Access for Incidental Memories in Natural Scenes.

Authors:  Lisandro N Kaunitz; Elise G Rowe; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 6.  What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel C Dennett; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Are we underestimating the richness of visual experience?

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Giulio Tononi; Christof Koch; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-02-05

10.  Prediction processes during multiple object tracking (MOT): involvement of dorsal and ventral premotor cortices.

Authors:  Silke Atmaca; Waltraud Stadler; Anne Keitel; Derek V M Ott; Jöran Lepsien; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.