Murat Beyhan1, Erkan Gökçe1, Şükrüye Firuze Ocak Karataş2. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey. 2. Department of Radiology, Tokat State Hospital, Yeni Mahallesi, Merkez, Tokat, Turkey. firuzeocak@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the differences in the sizes and configurations of various structures on brain MRIs of patients with intracranial hypotension (ICH) compared to normal individuals. METHODS: The present study consisted of two study groups as 21 patients with intracranial hypotension and 21 healthy individuals. Cranial MRI findings of patients with intracranial hypotension were compared retrospectively with MRI findings of patients without any pathology. Pachymeningeal enhancement, mamillopontine distance, venous sinus diameters, transverse and straight sinus distension, pituitary gland enlargement, tonsillar herniation, bleeding (subdural, epidural), pontomesencephalic angle, lateral ventricular angle, and pituitary infundibular angle were evaluated on MRI. RESULTS: Intracranial hypotension developed spontaneously in 6 cases and secondary in 15 patients. Diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement was observed in all intracranial hypotension cases. In addition, transverse sinus distension was observed in 19 cases, straight sinus distension in 17 cases, subdural effusion in 7 cases, spinal epidural effusion in 3 cases, tonsillar herniation in 2 cases, and thrombosis in dural sinuses in 2 cases. The intracranial hypotension group vs control group had dominant transverse sinus diameter 10 ± 1.75 vs 7.52 ± 1.2 mm, straight sinus diameter 4.76 ± 0.92 vs 3.69 ± 0.57 mm, superior sagittal sinus diameter 8.35 ± 1.57 vs 6.37 ± 0.71 mm, pontomesencephalic angle 46.67 ± 9.73° vs 56.27° ± 8.9°, mamillopontine distance 5.83 ± 1.5 vs 6.85 ± 1.1 mm, lateral ventricular angle 131.13° ± 6.17° vs 135.19° ± 5.28°, pituitary infundibular angle 44.42° ± 12.09° vs 63.3° ± 11.56°, and pituitary gland height 8.5 ± 1.83 vs 5.5 ± 1.27 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: In cases with clinically suspected intracranial hypotension, MRI findings may contribute to the diagnosis of intracranial hypotension with quantitative evaluations.
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the differences in the sizes and configurations of various structures on brain MRIs of patients with intracranial hypotension (ICH) compared to normal individuals. METHODS: The present study consisted of two study groups as 21 patients with intracranial hypotension and 21 healthy individuals. Cranial MRI findings of patients with intracranial hypotension were compared retrospectively with MRI findings of patients without any pathology. Pachymeningeal enhancement, mamillopontine distance, venous sinus diameters, transverse and straight sinus distension, pituitary gland enlargement, tonsillar herniation, bleeding (subdural, epidural), pontomesencephalic angle, lateral ventricular angle, and pituitary infundibular angle were evaluated on MRI. RESULTS: Intracranial hypotension developed spontaneously in 6 cases and secondary in 15 patients. Diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement was observed in all intracranial hypotension cases. In addition, transverse sinus distension was observed in 19 cases, straight sinus distension in 17 cases, subdural effusion in 7 cases, spinal epidural effusion in 3 cases, tonsillar herniation in 2 cases, and thrombosis in dural sinuses in 2 cases. The intracranial hypotension group vs control group had dominant transverse sinus diameter 10 ± 1.75 vs 7.52 ± 1.2 mm, straight sinus diameter 4.76 ± 0.92 vs 3.69 ± 0.57 mm, superior sagittal sinus diameter 8.35 ± 1.57 vs 6.37 ± 0.71 mm, pontomesencephalic angle 46.67 ± 9.73° vs 56.27° ± 8.9°, mamillopontine distance 5.83 ± 1.5 vs 6.85 ± 1.1 mm, lateral ventricular angle 131.13° ± 6.17° vs 135.19° ± 5.28°, pituitary infundibular angle 44.42° ± 12.09° vs 63.3° ± 11.56°, and pituitary gland height 8.5 ± 1.83 vs 5.5 ± 1.27 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: In cases with clinically suspected intracranial hypotension, MRI findings may contribute to the diagnosis of intracranial hypotension with quantitative evaluations.
Authors: Stephen M Chan; Yosef G Chodakiewitz; Marcel M Maya; Wouter I Schievink; Franklin G Moser Journal: Neuroimaging Clin N Am Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Wouter I Schievink; M Marcel Maya; Zachary R Barnard; Franklin G Moser; Stacey Jean-Pierre; Alan D Waxman; Miriam Nuño Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: I Yousry; S Förderreuther; B Moriggl; M Holtmannspötter; T P Naidich; A Straube; T A Yousry Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Haritanti; D Karacostas; A Drevelengas; V Kanellopoulos; E Paraskevopoulou; A Lefkopoulos; I Economou; A S Dimitriadis Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 3.528