| Literature DB >> 34988524 |
Mohammed Ali Azam1, Praloy Chakraborty1,2, Mahmoud M Bokhari1,2, Keith Dadson2, Beibei Du1, Stéphane Massé1, Daoyuan Si1, Ahmed Niri1, Arjun K Aggarwal1, Patrick F H Lai1, Sheila Riazi3, Filio Billia2, Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin (Dox) is a potent chemotherapeutic agent, but its usage is limited by dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. Intracellular calcium dysregulation has been reported to be involved in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (DICM). The cardioprotective role of RyR stabilizer dantrolene (Dan) on the calcium dynamics of DICM has not yet been explored.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac function; Cardiomyopathy; Dantrolene; Doxorubicin; Myocardial calcium transients
Year: 2021 PMID: 34988524 PMCID: PMC8710625 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.08.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 ISSN: 2666-5018
Figure 1A schematic representation of the experimental protocol.
Figure 2Temporal effects of dantrolene (Dan) on fractional shortening (FS) following doxorubicin (Dox) treatment. A: Effects of Dan 10 mg/kg daily on FS following Dox treatment. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, after day 7 of Dan treatment, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after Dox treatment. FS was significantly reduced 1 week following the Dox administration and sustained up to the observation period of 4 weeks. Treatment with Dan prevented the decline in FS after Dox treatment. Asterisk (∗) indicates significant differences at 1 week after the injection of Dox (P = .0009 control vs Dox only; P = .04 Dox vs Dan + Dox), 2 weeks after the injection of Dox (P < .0001 control vs Dox only; P < .0001 Dox vs Dan + Dox), 3 weeks after the injection of Dox (P = .0005 control vs Dox only; P = .001 Dox only vs Dan + Dox), and 4 weeks after the injection of Dox (P = .001 control vs Dox; P = .002 Dox vs Dan + Dox). N = 4–5 mice per group. B: Representative images of M-mode echocardiography at 4 weeks after Dox treatment. C: Effects of Dan at 2 and 4 weeks following Dox treatment. FS as measured by echocardiography in the 4 groups. Asterisk (∗) denotes significant difference vs controls (P < .0001 at 2 weeks and P = .001 at 4 weeks after Dox injection) and ¥ denotes significant difference vs Dox group (P < .0001 at 2 weeks and P = .002 at 4 weeks after Dox injection). N = 4–5 mice per group.
Figure 3Effects of dantrolene (Dan) on ejection fraction following doxorubicin (Dox) treatment. Ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography in the 4 groups at 2 and 4 weeks following Dox treatment as described in Methods section. Asterisk (∗) denotes significant difference vs controls (P < .0001 at 2 weeks and P = .006 at 4 weeks) and ¥ denotes significant difference vs Dox only group (P < .0001 at 2 weeks and P = .002 at 4 weeks). N = 4–5 mice per group.
Figure 4Effects of dantrolene (Dan) on calcium transient dynamics following doxorubicin (Dox) treatment. A: Calcium transient duration 50 (CaTD50) at different pacing rates. Asterisk (∗) denotes P = .02 vs control group and ¥ denotes P = .007 vs Dan + Dox-treated group. Overall, P = .0005 by 2-way ANOVA among the 4 groups. N = 4–6 in each group. B: Calcium transient duration 80 (CaTD80) at different pacing rates. Asterisk (∗) denotes P = .001 vs controls, and ¥ denotes P = .0003 vs Dan + Dox-treated group. Overall, P < .0001 by 2-way ANOVA among the 4 groups. N = 4–6 mice per group. C: Calcium transient rise time. Rise time was calculated from the optical signal as described in the Methods section. Overall, P = .02 by 2-way ANOVA among the 4 groups. N = 4–6 in each group. D: Spontaneous calcium elevation (SCaE). SCaE was measured from the optical signal as described in Methods section. Overall P = .30 by 2-way ANOVA among the 4 groups. N = 4–6 mice per group.
Figure 5Effects of dantrolene (Dan) on Ca2+ amplitude alternans ratios (CaAAR) following doxorubicin (Dox) treatment. CaAAR was measured from the optical signal as described in the Methods section. a: Representative fluorescence tracings showing the calcium amplitude alternans in different groups. b: Graphical presentation of CaAAR at different pacing rates. Asterisk (∗) denotes P < .0001 vs control and ¥ denotes P = .04 vs Dan + Dox-treated group. Overall, P < .0001 by 2-way ANOVA among the 4 groups. N = 4–6 mice per group.