We study the interaction between amyloid β (Aβ) peptides and Cu and Zn metal ions by using soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The spectral features of the peptides and Cu are simultaneously characterized by recording spectra at the N K-edge and at the Cu L2,3 -edges. In the presence of the peptides, the Cu L2,3 -edge shows a fingerprint of monovalent Cu(I), caused by the interaction with the peptides. The appearance of Cu(I) is less significant at an acidic pH than at a basic pH. Furthermore, aggregation leads to a smaller signature of Cu(I). N K-edge spectra reveal that Cu and Zn ions exhibit a different coordination with the nitrogen atoms in the peptides. This suggests different roles of Cu and Zn in the peptide aggregation. Our work provides physical insight into the participation of the metal ions and Aβ in the toxic reactive oxygen species formation.
We study the interaction between amyloid β (Aβ) peptides and Cu and Zn metal ions by using soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The spectral features of the peptides and Cu are simultaneously characterized by recording spectra at the N K-edge and at the Cu L2,3 -edges. In the presence of the peptides, the Cu L2,3 -edge shows a fingerprint of monovalent Cu(I), caused by the interaction with the peptides. The appearance of Cu(I) is less significant at an acidic pH than at a basic pH. Furthermore, aggregation leads to a smaller signature of Cu(I). N K-edge spectra reveal that Cu and Zn ions exhibit a different coordination with the nitrogen atoms in the peptides. This suggests different roles of Cu and Zn in the peptide aggregation. Our work provides physical insight into the participation of the metal ions and Aβ in the toxic reactive oxygen species formation.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of progressively neurodegenerative diseases and poses an increasing burden for our aging societies. The disease is associated with the loss of neuronal connections and manifested by amyloid β (Aβ) fibril plaques and Tau neurofibrillary tangles in the brain (Ittner and Götz, 2011). Aβ is cleaved from intramembrane proteolytic processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-/γ-secretase (Selkoe and Hardy, 2016). The Aβ peptides may aggregate into transient and on-pathway oligomers, and eventually deposit as insoluble fibrils within the plaques (Luo et al., 2014) (Wu et al., 2020, 2021). Among these aggregates, on-pathway oligomers are assumed in many studies to induce the neuronal dysfunction (Glabe, 2008). Alternatively, the peptides can be stabilized as the off-pathway oligomers (Ehrnhoefer et al., 2008) with which the preformed fibril seeds do not promote fibril formation (Dear et al., 2020). However, cellular toxicity cannot be distinguished from the on- or off-pathway identity (Dear et al., 2020). In addition to the oligomer toxicity, it has been suggested that the concentration of metal ions, like copper, is increased by up to 5.7 times in the plaques of AD brains as compared with the healthy ones (Dong et al., 2003). Copper ions catalyze the formation of toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cause damage to the surrounding brain tissue (Pithadia and Lim, 2012). The copper homeostasis imbalance influences Aβ toxicity, aggregation, and other intracellular processes (Kenche and Barnham, 2011; Maynard et al., 2005).Over the past decade, a number of biophysical methods have allowed to characterize the interaction and coordination chemistry between Aβ and copper. In combination with density functional theory, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) studies suggested a six-coordinate (3N3O) geometry with copper in the complexes of Aβ1-16-Cu at pH 7.4 where residues His6, His13, His14, Glu11, or/and Asp1, and axial water are involved (Streltsov et al., 2008). At different pHs, the Aβ1-16-Cu complexes are prone to the formation of the 3N1O coordination sphere (Dorlet et al., 2009; Drew et al., 2009a,2009b; Trujano-ortiz and Quintanar, 2015). At pH 6.3–6.9, the copper coordination sphere is contributed by three amino acids from the Aβ1-16 peptide, His6, His13/His14, and Asp1. At pH 8, copper is coordinated with four amino acids, His6, His13, His14, and Ala2 (Drew et al., 2009a, 2009b). The latter 3N1O coordination sphere of copper with three nitrogens and one oxygen was confirmed by homology modeling techniques with quantum mechanics-based approaches (Alí-Torres et al., 2011). The Faller and Hureau lab also found two components of the Aβ1–16 and Cu(II) interactions at pH 6.5 and pH 9.0. Cu(II) binds to the carbonyl from the amide bond of Asp1–Ala2 and the imidazole nitrogens from His6 and His13/His14, at pH 6.5 (Atrián-Blasco et al., 2017). In the second component, the nitrogen atom of the Asp1–Ala2 amide bond binds to Cu(II) after deprotonation at pH 9.0 (Dorlet et al., 2009)(Atrián-Blasco et al., 2017). As for Zn(II), the N-terminal amine of the peptide does not coordinate to the metal ion at a physiological pH (Atrián-Blasco et al., 2017). Besides the mononuclear Cu(II) site, a binuclear Cu(II) site has also been proposed with a deprotonated histidine to bridge two Cu(II) ions (Karr et al., 2004). These suggest that the Aβ-Cu coordination sphere as well as its redox behavior could be determined by the pH. The understanding of the coordination environment of Cu-Aβ gives a mechanistic insight into the disease-related ROS production and provides an important perspective for the rational design of new chelators in the development of therapeutics against AD.Despite the characterization of Cu surrounded by Aβ residues by techniques such as EPR (Electron paramagnetic resonance) (Dorlet et al., 2009; Posadas et al., 2021),NMR (Nuclear magnetic resonance) (Tiiman et al., 2016) (Luo et al., 2013), or hard X-rays (Shearer et al., 2010), the reduced state of Cu remains to be explored upon binding to Aβ or other amyloid proteins. Although EPR allows to detect Cu(II) with unpaired electrons, this technique does not directly give the properties of Cu(I) and nitrogen. NMR is only able to directly observe the properties of peptides rather than the ones of copper. Furthermore, the simultaneous investigation of Cu and the peptide is impossible using hard X-rays because of the absence of any nitrogen resonant excitations in the hard X-ray regime. XAS in the soft X-ray range employing photons of a few hundreds of eV up to 2 keV allows to study in an element specific way the spectroscopic signatures of Cu and N, which depend on their chemical environments (Kvashnina et al., 2009) (Shimizu et al., 2001) (Leinweber et al., 2007). More specifically, this involves excitations at photon energies around 930 … 950 eV reaching from the Cu 2p to the Cu 3d orbitals, the so-called Cu L2,3-edges thus probing empty states (holes) in the 3d shell. In the case of N 1s → 2p, excitations are probed at photon energies of 400 … 420 eV, which are termed the N K-edge. Importantly, soft XAS allows studying both Cu and N under exactly the same conditions in the same sample, which makes it a unique tool for the investigation of the interaction of peptides with transition metals. Here, we implement soft XAS to investigate the Cu L2,3-edges and the nitrogen K-edge in the complex of Aβ1−40 and Cu/Zn under various pH values and incubation conditions.
Results
Figure 1 displays X-ray spectra recorded on Aβ1-40 samples prepared with different concentrations of CuCl2 at an acidic pH of 5.5. The N K-edge spectra can be separated into a π∗ excitation range at energies below ∼403 eV and a σ∗ one at higher energies. The π∗ excitation range includes a strong sharp peak at 400.6 eV and a smaller pre-peak feature located at a photon energy of 399.3 eV. The pre-peak feature is strongest without CuCl2, and upon increasing the CuCl2 concentration, it gradually disappears. This is clearly visible in the zoom shown in Figure 1B. The pre-peak feature of 50 μM Aβ is completely eliminated in the presence of 50 μM Cu(II). This is in agreement with a 1:1 reaction stoichiometric ratio of Cu(II) to Aβ (Atrián-Blasco et al., 2017). The spectrum of the 1000 μM sample (incubated for 1 day at 30°C) has a slightly lower intensity of the π∗ peak and a different pre-peak feature that could originate from the structural changes because of the different aggregation pathway in the presence of the concentrated Cu(II) ions (Han et al., 2021; Mold et al., 2013; Viles, 2012). At a high stoichiometric ratio of Cu(II) to Aβ, Cu(II) precipitates Aβ42 as amorphous deposits (Mold et al., 2013; Viles, 2012). Given our observations, we ascribe the loss of the pre-peak feature at 399.3 eV to the interaction of Aβ1-40 with Cu(II) ions from CuCl2.
Figure 1
Effect of the concentration of CuCl2 mixed with Aβ1–40 at pH 5.5
X-ray absorption spectra recorded (A and B) at the nitrogen K-edge and (C) at the Cu L2,3-edges on 50 μM Aβ1–40 mixed with CuCl2 solutions of different concentrations at pH 5.5. 200 μL of sample was prepared with 50 μM Aβ1–40 and 20 mMKPi buffer, pH 5.5, in the presence of 0, 10, 50, 250, or 1000 μM CuCl2, and then 50 μL of each sample was deposited on a silicon dioxide wafer and immediately dried under nitrogen gas for recording X-ray absorption spectra. Vertical dashed and solid lines in (B) and (C) follow the features discussed in the main text.
Effect of the concentration of CuCl2 mixed with Aβ1–40 at pH 5.5X-ray absorption spectra recorded (A and B) at the nitrogen K-edge and (C) at the Cu L2,3-edges on 50 μM Aβ1–40 mixed with CuCl2 solutions of different concentrations at pH 5.5. 200 μL of sample was prepared with 50 μM Aβ1–40 and 20 mMKPi buffer, pH 5.5, in the presence of 0, 10, 50, 250, or 1000 μM CuCl2, and then 50 μL of each sample was deposited on a silicon dioxide wafer and immediately dried under nitrogen gas for recording X-ray absorption spectra. Vertical dashed and solid lines in (B) and (C) follow the features discussed in the main text.The corresponding Cu L-edge spectra normalized to the total area of the peaks are plotted in Figure 1C. While peak A at an energy of 928.5 eV can be attributed to the excitation of Cu(II) ions exhibiting a 3d9 electronic configuration, for example, in small non-reacted clusters of CuCl2, a new species is observed giving rise to peak B at a photon energy of 932.5 eV. We attribute this peak to the Cu ions, which can be reduced to Cu(I) upon oxidation of the Aβ peptides possibly through the N-terminal residues, Asp1, Ala2, His6, His 13, and His14 (Trujano-ortiz and Quintanar, 2015). This is supported by the change of the spectral weight across the concentration series. The remarkably large splitting of ∼4 eV between peaks A and B excludes that B is related to Cu2O, where a splitting of ∼2.5 eV would be expected (Grioni et al., 1992). Furthermore, the comparison with the reference measurement on Cu(II)-phthalocyanine shown in the SI and with the literature allows us to exclude that peak B originates from Cu(II) or even Cu(III) species (Shimizu et al., 2001). The latter two species display ligand-field and oxidation-state induced peak shifts, yet these shifts occur within a spread of ∼2 eV below and ∼1 eV above the L3-edge of the Cu(II)-phthalocyanine reference. In line with literature reports, peak B corresponds to the presence of a 3d10 configuration in monovalent Cu(I). Formally, in an isotropic environment the strong dipole allowed 2p→3d absorption would be completely suppressed because of the full 3d shell; however, in the presence of the Aβ1–40 peptide offering nitrogen ligands, the hybridization of the Cu 3d orbitals with Cu 4sp and with the ligand orbitals is possible (Hatsui et al., 2004). The transition energy is, however, significantly higher because of the much lower excitonic downshift as compared to Cu(II) (Grioni et al., 1992). Hence, we conclude that there is a significant fraction of monovalent Cu(I) interacting with the Aβ1-40 peptide. This is further corroborated by an X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurement described in the supplemental information (Figure S1). Note that it is difficult to quantify the exact ratio of Cu(I) vs Cu(II) species because the X-ray absorption cross section of Cu(I) is expected to be lower owing to the smaller amount of 3d holes. This implies that at equal areas of peaks A and B there is more Cu(I) than Cu(II) present in the probed volume.The analogous X-ray spectra of samples prepared at a neutral pH of 7.4 are shown in Figure 2. An inspection of the N K-edge spectra reveals that the evolution of the pre-peak feature is different in that it disappears only at a concentration of 250 μM whereas at the lower pH it is already absent at a concentration of about 50 μM. This striking behavior is also reflected in the Cu L-edge spectra where the equal height of the peaks of inorganically bound Cu(II) (peak A) and the one bound to the peptide (B) is reached at the concentrations of 50 μM (pH 5.5) and 250 μM (pH 7.4), respectively. The pH dependence of the pre-peak disappearance can be associated with the reduction to Cu(I). At pH 5.5, the peptides are prone to protonation with histidines with a more efficient redox cycling with Cu(II) than that of pH 7.4. The low pH at 5.5 is assumed as the acidosis, associated with inflammatory processes in AD and the elevated neurotoxicity of Aβ (Ghalebani et al., 2012). The acidosis may further explain the lower stoichiometric ratio between Cu and Aβ at a lower pH in our studies.
Figure 2
Effect of the concentration of CuCl2 mixed with Aβ1–40 at pH 7.4
X-ray absorption spectra recorded (A and B) at the nitrogen K-edge and (C) at the Cu L2,3-edges on Aβ1–40 mixed with CuCl2 solutions of different concentrations at pH 7.4. 200 μL of sample was prepared with 50 μM Aβ1–40 and 20 mMKPi buffer, pH 7.4, in the presence of 0, 10, 50, 250, or 1000 μM CuCl2, and then 50 μL of each sample was deposited on a silicon dioxide wafer and immediately dried under nitrogen gas for recording X-ray absorption spectra. Vertical lines in (C) follow peaks A and B discussed in the main text.
Effect of the concentration of CuCl2 mixed with Aβ1–40 at pH 7.4X-ray absorption spectra recorded (A and B) at the nitrogen K-edge and (C) at the Cu L2,3-edges on Aβ1–40 mixed with CuCl2 solutions of different concentrations at pH 7.4. 200 μL of sample was prepared with 50 μM Aβ1–40 and 20 mMKPi buffer, pH 7.4, in the presence of 0, 10, 50, 250, or 1000 μM CuCl2, and then 50 μL of each sample was deposited on a silicon dioxide wafer and immediately dried under nitrogen gas for recording X-ray absorption spectra. Vertical lines in (C) follow peaks A and B discussed in the main text.To characterize the dependence of the absorption spectra on the Aβ1–40 aggregation, we incubated part of the samples for 4 h at room temperature and for 1 day at 30°C (Broersen et al., 2011). In Table S1, the peak B/A ratios are given for different preparation conditions of Aβ1-40 and CuCl2 concentrations. At pH 5.5, the peak B of the Cu spectra seems less visible than at pH 7.4 in the presence of 4-h incubated and 24-h incubated Aβ1-40 aggregate, possibly representing small aggregates and insoluble large aggregates(Luo et al., 2014)(Broersen et al., 2011), respectively, indicative of the larger Aβ1-40-Cu aggregates formation from the acidosis. Apart from the trend of stronger Aβ1-40-Cu interaction at a lower pH, this also points to a dependence of the B/A ratio on the incubation time and temperature, which suggests the conversion of Cu(I) toward Cu(II) during the incubation process. It could also be due to structural modifications in the aggregation of the Aβ1-40 peptide and the buried Cu sites after incubation such that they are not detected anymore with the surface-sensitive total electron yield detection applied here.In Figure 3, the N K-edge absorption spectra of Aβ1-40 mixed with CuCl2 or ZnCl2 solutions at different concentrations are plotted. It is striking that independent of the concentration the pre-peak features are essentially unchanged in the presence of ZnCl2, while they disappear almost completely with CuCl2. This indicates that the interaction of the Aβ1-40 peptide with Cu is entirely different from the one with Zn. Furthermore, it confirms that the pre-peak feature of the N K-edge spectra is indeed a unique fingerprint of Aβ1-40 upon binding to Cu. We also investigated the absorption spectra of Cu with Parkinson-associated α-syn, type II diabetes-related IAPP, or Aβ1-42. Figure 4 displays N K-edge and Cu L-edge absorption spectra of different peptides/proteins mixed with CuCl2. In comparison with Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42 exhibits a slightly higher B/A ratio of the L3-edge at a concentration of 50 μM. The difference could indicate a different reaction of Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 to Cu(II) in the redox cycling. In the presence of other amyloid proteins, we also observed an increased ratio of B/A in the L3-edge, suggesting the existence of the redox cycling. As their sequences vary, each protein may display a distinct mechanism of redox cycling which is beyond the scope of this study.
Figure 3
Comparison of the effect of Zn and Cu ions mixed with Aβ1–40 at pH 7.4
(A) Comparison of N K-edge spectra with 50 μM Aβ1–40 mixed with CuCl2 and ZnCl2 solutions of different concentrations. A zoom is shown in (B). The ZnCl2 sample was prepared by using the same conditions as applied for the CuCl2 sample. The dashed vertical line in (B) follows the pre-edge feature discussed in the main text.
Figure 4
Comparison of the effect of CuCl2 mixed with different peptides at pH 7.4
(A and B) N K-edge and (C) Cu L2,3-edge spectra recorded on different peptides prepared with CuCl2 as indicated in the plot. All samples were prepared in 20 mMKPi buffer, at pH 7.4 by varying the concentrations of CuCl2. Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, IAPP, and α-Syn were prepared at the concentrations of 50 μM, 50 μM, 60 μM, and 130 μM, respectively. Vertical dashed and solid lines in (B) and (C) follow the features discussed in the main text.
Comparison of the effect of Zn and Cu ions mixed with Aβ1–40 at pH 7.4(A) Comparison of N K-edge spectra with 50 μM Aβ1–40 mixed with CuCl2 and ZnCl2 solutions of different concentrations. A zoom is shown in (B). The ZnCl2 sample was prepared by using the same conditions as applied for the CuCl2 sample. The dashed vertical line in (B) follows the pre-edge feature discussed in the main text.Comparison of the effect of CuCl2 mixed with different peptides at pH 7.4(A and B) N K-edge and (C) Cu L2,3-edge spectra recorded on different peptides prepared with CuCl2 as indicated in the plot. All samples were prepared in 20 mMKPi buffer, at pH 7.4 by varying the concentrations of CuCl2. Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, IAPP, and α-Syn were prepared at the concentrations of 50 μM, 50 μM, 60 μM, and 130 μM, respectively. Vertical dashed and solid lines in (B) and (C) follow the features discussed in the main text.
Discussion
Briefly, by using N K-edge and Cu L2,3 soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy, we simultaneously characterize the Cu and N atoms in the Aβ-Cu complex. The pre-peak feature in the N K-edge spectra of Aβ1-40 at 399.3 eV disappears upon binding to CuCl2 in contrast to the case of ZnCl2. We attribute the loss of this pre-peak feature to the interaction of Aβ1-40 with CuCl2. The distinguished binding feature of Aβ to Cu(II) and Zn(II) can be caused by the different N-terminal amine coordination of Aβ to these metal ions (Atrián-Blasco et al., 2017). Compared to the Cu binding mentioned in the introduction, the Zn(II) ion interacts with His6 and His13/His14, and with two carboxylate residues from Glu11 and Asp1 or Glu3 or Asp7 rather than with the N-terminal amine (Alies et al., 2016; Atrián-Blasco et al., 2017; Faller et al., 2014). We therefore believe that the N-terminal amine contributes to the pre-peak feature in the N K-edge spectra. Our observation also supports a situation similar to what is observed by circular dichroism (CD) by which the more potent β-sheet structure and extensive aggregation can be induced by Cu but not by Zn (Ghalebani et al., 2012). The loss of the pre-peak feature might be caused by a change of the valence state toward Cu(I) of the peptide-coordinated Cu ions. Alternatively, a structural modification through the Cu-Aβ1-40 hybridization leading to more buried Cu(I) centers in conjunction with the surface-sensitive (∼5 nm) X-ray detection could lead to a decrease of the B/A ratio. On the contrary, zinc acts as a chaperone to reduce the fibril formation (Abelein et al., 2015) and therefore retains the pre-peak feature.Our results are in agreement with previous EPR studies in which Cu(II)/Aβ1-16 complexes possess distinct redox behavior (Trujano-ortiz and Quintanar, 2015), indicative of an intermediate Cu(I) species. With the peak B of the Cu L2,3 spectra, we observe a significant conversion toward monovalent Cu(I) from Cu(II) after interacting with Aβ. The presence of Cu(I) in the Aβ1-40-Cu complex shown in Figures 1C and 2C is a straightforward evidence of the aforementioned interaction. Cu(I) can originate from redox cycling of the Cu(II)-Aβ complex, in which three possible intermediate states of bis-His(Aβ)-Cu(I) are involved (Faller et al., 2014)(Trujano-ortiz and Quintanar, 2015). The recycling starts with geometrical reorganization after Cu(II) leaves the N-terminal and the carbonyl groups, and then a bis-His(Aβ)-Cu(I) complex is formed (Faller et al., 2014)(Trujano-ortiz and Quintanar, 2015). The pH may influence the recycling by changing the protonation of His. This is further supported by the pH dependence of the Cu spectra where we reveal the relevant physical chemistry linking acidosis and Alzheimer's disease. As revealed by Table S1, in Cu-Aβ aggregates, the Cu(I) peak (peak B/A ratio) is much less significant at a pH of 5.5 as compared with pH 7.4, presumably caused by faster aggregation of Cu-Aβ at pH 5.5 than pH 7.4 (Ghalebani et al., 2012). These insoluble Aβ aggregates with Cu(II) at pH 5.5 may be less accessible for the reduction of Cu(II) than the ones at pH 7.4. In conclusion, our soft X-ray study reveals the physical chemistry of the Cu and N atoms behind the Aβ1-40 and copper interaction at varied conditions mimicking the acidosis in Alzheimer's disease.
Limitations of the study
The study demonstrates the interaction of amyloid-beta with copper and zinc using synchrotron-based soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. One of the limitations is that the zinc atoms are spectroscopically less accessible because of their weaker X-ray absorption due to the absence of strong resonant features. The interaction of amyloid-beta with zinc can thus only be observed indirectly through the nitrogen K-edge spectroscopy. Another limitation is the spatial resolution, therefore no statements can be made about the spatial distribution of the copper ions and, for example, about its homogeneity. In the present study, spatial resolution is limited by the rather large X-ray spot size on the order of 0.5 mm2. In the future, spatially resolved experiments will be performed using suitable X-ray microscopes.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contacts Jinghui Luo (jinghui.luo@psi.ch) and Jan Dreiser (jan.dreiser@psi.ch).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Method details
Sample preparation
Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 peptides were bought from AlexoTechAB(Cat.ID: AB-100-10) and rPeptide (Cat.ID: A-1163-1), respectively. Both peptides were dissolved in 10 mMNaOH at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and sonicated in a water-ice bath for 1 min. Afterward, it was diluted for the preparation with the Aβ and CuCl2/ZnCl2 complex. CuCl2 (Cat. ID: 451,665) and ZnCl2 (Cat.ID: 208,086) were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich. In addition, Amylin (1–37)/IAPP was ordered from AnaSpec (Cat.ID: AS-60804) and dissolved to 20 mMKPi buffer after evaporating HFIP (Hexafluoroisopropanol). α-Synuclein proteins were expressed and purified followed by the established protocols (Huang et al., 2005). Briefly, E.coliBL21 (DE3) pLysS strain was used to express α-Synuclein and induced with 0.5 mMIPTG for 5 h at 37°. Sucrose osmotic shock was applied for releasing α-Synuclein from the periplasm. Ion-exchange and size-exclusion chromatography were then used for further purification of α-Synuclein. The fractions with the purified protein were verified by running SDS page. 20 mMKPi buffer was used for preparing/diluting samples for the measurements. Regarding the incubated samples in Table S1, they were prepared with the highest concentration of 1000 μM of CuCl2 in 200 μL KPi buffer, and then incubated under quiescent condition for 4 h at room temperature or for 1 day at 30°C. Others samples mentioned in the manuscript were prepared in 200 μL, 20mMKPi buffer (pH 5.5 and pH 7.4) with 0, 10, 50, 250 or 1000 μM CuCl2/ZnCl2, 50 μL of which were used to deposit for 10 min on the surface of a silicon dioxide wafer. All of the deposited samples were immediately dried with nitrogen gas for X-ray absorption measurements.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy
Spectra were recorded at the X-Treme beamline (Piamonteze et al., 2012) at the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut. To protect the samples from beam damage, an attenuated photon flux and a defocused X-ray spot (∼0.5 mm2) on the sample were chosen. Specifically, the impinging X-ray photon flux per area was 0.06 photons/sec/nm2 at the Cu L2,3-edges and 0.15 photons/sec/nm2 at the N K-edge. No changes of the spectral weight of peaks A, B over timescales of several tens of minutes could be observed. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the spectra were recorded at room temperature in normal incidence of the X-ray beam. The Cu L2,3 spectra were normalized for the sum of the peak areas A and B to yield a constant of 1.0 after subtracting the base line. Furthermore, the N K-edge spectra were base line subtracted and normalized by a linear scaling such that the post edge was forced to 1. Reference spectra at the Cu L2,3-edges and at the N K-edge were obtained on a drop cast film of Cu(II)-pthalocyanine on silicon dioxide (Figure S2).
Authors: Jian Dong; Craig S Atwood; Vernon E Anderson; Sandra L Siedlak; Mark A Smith; George Perry; Paul R Carey Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2003-03-18 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Ann Tiiman; Jinghui Luo; Cecilia Wallin; Lisa Olsson; Joel Lindgren; Jϋri Jarvet; Roos Per; Sabrina B Sholts; Shai Rahimipour; Jan Pieter Abrahams; Amelie Eriksson Karlström; Astrid Gräslund; Sebastian K T S Wärmländer Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Peter Leinweber; Jens Kruse; Fran L Walley; Adam Gillespie; Kai Uwe Eckhardt; Robert I R Blyth; Tom Regier Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat Date: 2007-10-13 Impact factor: 2.616
Authors: Jinghui Luo; Chien-Hung Yu; Huixin Yu; Rok Borstnar; Shina C L Kamerlin; Astrid Gräslund; Jan Pieter Abrahams; Sebastian K T S Wärmländer Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 4.418