| Literature DB >> 34988342 |
Aline I Moser1, Peter M Keller1, Edgar I Campos-Madueno1,2, Laurent Poirel3,4,5, Patrice Nordmann3,4,5, Andrea Endimiani1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients colonized with multiple species of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are increasingly observed. This phenomenon can be due to the high local prevalence of these pathogens, the presence of important host risk factors, and the great genetic promiscuity of some carbapenemase genes.Entities:
Keywords: ArmA; CPE; Enterobacterales; NDM-1; carbapenemases; plasmid
Year: 2021 PMID: 34988342 PMCID: PMC8714174 DOI: 10.20411/pai.v6i2.482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Immun ISSN: 2469-2964
Summary of the samples and bacteria isolated from the patient during the routine tests
| Day | Sample taken and results (if any) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||
|
| |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 6 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
Days from the hospitalization (admission at our institution in Bern, Switzerland)
Gram-negatives non-susceptible to carbapenems are reported in bold. “CP” indicates that these strains were carbapenemase producers according to the results of the Rapid Carba NP, CarbAcineto NP, NG-Test CARBA-5 and/or eazyplex assays implemented by the routine laboratory.
These bacteria were selected for WGS. We show their MIC values and genetic data in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.
This strain was extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant (ESC-R), but carbapenem susceptible (see Table 2)
The patient was transferred to another Swiss institution
Phenotypic characterization of the 6 Gram-negatives isolated from the same patient
| Antibiotics | Strain (species and lab code), sample and MICs (mg/L) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | >64 | R | <4 | S | >64 | R | >64 | R | >64 | R | >64 | na |
| Ticarcillin-clavulanate | >128 | R | 128 | R | >128 | R | >128 | R | >128 | R | >128 | na |
| Cefpodoxime | >32 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | nt | |
| Ceftazidime | >128 | R | 32 | R | >128 | R | 128 | R | >128 | R | >128 | na |
| Ceftazidime-clavulanate | >128 | na | 0.25 | na | >128 | na | 128 | na | >128 | na | nt | |
| Ceftriaxone | >128 | R | 128 | R | >128 | R | >128 | R | >128 | R | nt | |
| Cefotaxime | >64 | R | 64 | R | >64 | R | >64 | R | >64 | R | >64 | na |
| Cefotaxime-clavulanate | >64 | na | <0.125 | na | >64 | na | >64 | na | >64 | na | nt | na |
| Cefepime | >16 | R | 8 | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | 16 | na |
| Aztreonam | >16 | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >16 | na |
| Imipenem | 1 | S | <0.5 | S | 8 | R | 2 | I | 8 | R | >8 | R |
| Meropenem | <1 | S | <1 | S | >8 | R | 2 | S | 8 | R | >8 | R |
| Doripenem | 0.5 | na | <0.125 | na | >2 | na | 1 | na | >2 | na | >2 | na |
| Ertapenem | 2 | R | <0.25 | S | >4 | R | 0.5 | S | >4 | R | >4 | na |
| Gentamicin | >8 | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | >8 | R |
| Tobramycin | >8 | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | 4 | S |
| Amikacin | >32 | R | <4 | S | >32 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R |
| Ciprofloxacin | 1 | R | 2 | R | >2 | R | >2 | R | <0.25 | S | >2 | R |
| Levofloxacin | <1 | S | <1 | S | 8 | R | >8 | R | <1 | S | 4 | R |
| Doxycycline | >16 | na | <2 | na | 16 | na | >16 | na | <2 | na | <2 | na |
| Minocycline | 8 | na | <2 | na | 4 | na | >16 | na | <2 | na | <2 | na |
| Tigecycline | <0.25 | S | 0.5 | na | 1 | na | 2 | na | 0.5 | S | <0.25 | na |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | >4 | R | 2 | S | >4 | R | 4 | I | >4 | R | <0.5 | S |
| Colistin | <0.25 | S | <0.25 | S | <0.25 | S | >4 | na | <0.25 | S | <0.25 | S |
| Polymyxin B | 0.5 | na | 0.5 | na | 0.5 | na | >4 | na | <0.25 | na | <0.25 | na |
Note. R, resistant; I, susceptible, increased exposure; S, susceptible; na, not available or not applicable; nt, not tested
MICs were obtained with microdilution Sensititre panel GNX2F and ESB1F and interpreted according to the EUCAST 2019 criteria (version 9.0). A. baumannii was tested using only the GNX2F panel.
Species identification was obtained based on the WGS and implementing the hybrid WGS assembling
Molecular characterization of the 5 Enterobacterales isolated from the same patient
| Sequence ID | GenBank | Sequence type | Length (bp) | Inc group | Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) | Genetic environment of the main ARGs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 3347558 | CP071073 | chromosome | 5′631′396 | - | mdf(A) | |
| p3347558_1 | CP071074 | plasmid | 169′082 | C type 1a | IS | |
| p3347558_2 | CP071075 | plasmid | 129′523 | FIA, Y | ||
| p3347558_3 | CP071076 | plasmid | 93′750 | I1-I (Gamma) | IS | |
| p3347558_4 | CP071077 | plasmid | 64′917 | FII | nd | |
| p3347558_5 | CP071078 | plasmid | 5′167 | nd | nd | |
| p3347558_6 | CP071079 | plasmid | 4′072 | nd | nd | |
|
| ||||||
| 3347684 II | CP071080 | chromosome | 5′290′520 | - |
| |
| p3347684 II_1 | CP071081 | plasmid | 155′851 | FIB(K) | nd | |
| p3347684 II_2 | CP071082 | plasmid | 110′998 | FIB | nd | |
| p3347684 II_3 | CP071083 | plasmid | 64′471 | nd | IS | |
| p3347684 II_4 | CP071084 | Plasmid | 63′577 | FII(Yp) | nd | |
| p3347684 II_5 | CP071085 | plasmid | 4′251 | Col(pHAD28) | nd | |
|
| ||||||
| 3347689I | CP071086 | chromosome | 5′620′517 | - | IS | |
| p3347689I_1 | CP071087 | plasmid | 222′786 | C type 1a / R | IS | |
| p3347689I_2 | CP071088 | plasmid | 9′730 | ColRNAI | Nd | |
| p3347689I_3 | CP071089 | plasmid | 4′052 | Col440II | Nd | |
|
| ||||||
| 3347685 | CP071068 | chromosome | 4′476′038 | - | IS | |
| p3347685_1 | CP071069 | plasmid | 188′750 | C type 1b | IS | |
|
| ||||||
| 3347689 II | CP071070 | chromosome | 4′756′279 | - |
| |
| p3347689 II_1 | CP071071 | plasmid | 166′860 | C type 1a | IS | |
| p3347689 II_2 | CP071072 | plasmid | 44′080 | R | ||
Note. nd, none detected
The main ARGs are in bold
All sequences were obtained by a hybrid WGS sequencing approach combining Illumina and Nanopore reads
The upstream region of the chromosomal AmpC did not contain mutations able to improve the expression of the bla gene
Figure 1.BLASTn comparison of IncC-type plasmid sequences. A) The IncC-type plasmids from the present study were compared to other sequences selected based on high homology in a BLASTn search against the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide collection. Plasmid sequence pPS-T1 was used as reference sequence. Rings were constructed using BRIG (BLAST Ring Image Generator) v.0.95. The colored rings represent similarities to the reference sequence. CDS are depicted as grey arrows in the outermost circle. Mobile genetic elements (MGE) are depicted in white, the blaNDM-1 in blue, armA in red, and all other antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in black. We report GenBank accession, species of isolation, strain name, sequence size, and country of origin. The blaNDM-1-containing region is bordered with a black line. B) Genetic environment of the blaNDM-1- and armA-containing region in the reference sequence pPS-T1 (GenBank: MN657252) compared to the IncC plasmids from our study. Hypothetical proteins are depicted as light grey arrows, other CDS are depicted in dark grey.