Literature DB >> 34988241

Automated Artifact Rejection Algorithms Harm P3 Speller Brain-Computer Interface Performance.

David E Thompson1, Md Rakibul Mowla1, Katie J Dhuyvetter1, Joseph W Tillman1, Jane E Huggins2.   

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) have been used to restore communication and control to people with severe paralysis. However, non-invasive BCIs based on electroencephalogram (EEG) are particularly vulnerable to noise artifacts. These artifacts, including electro-oculogram (EOG), can be orders of magnitude larger than the signal to be detected. Many automated methods have been proposed to remove EOG and other artifacts from EEG recordings, most based on blind source separation. This work presents a performance comparison of ten different automated artifact removal methods. Unfortunately, all tested methods substantially and significantly reduced P3 Speller BCI performance, and all methods were more likely to reduce performance than increase it. The least harmful methods were titled SOBI, JADER, and EFICA, but even these methods caused an average of approximately ten percentage points drop in BCI accuracy. Possible mechanistic causes for this empirical performance deduction are proposed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain-computer interfaces; P300 speller; artifacts rejection; physiological signals; signal processing

Year:  2020        PMID: 34988241      PMCID: PMC8725686          DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2020.1734401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)        ISSN: 2326-2621


  17 in total

Review 1.  Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.

Authors:  Jonathan R Wolpaw; Niels Birbaumer; Dennis J McFarland; Gert Pfurtscheller; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Does the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?

Authors:  P Brunner; S Joshi; S Briskin; J R Wolpaw; H Bischof; G Schalk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Long-term independent brain-computer interface home use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked-in state: a case study.

Authors:  Elisa Mira Holz; Loic Botrel; Tobias Kaufmann; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Canonical correlation analysis applied to remove muscle artifacts from the electroencephalogram.

Authors:  Wim De Clercq; Anneleen Vergult; Bart Vanrumste; Wim Van Paesschen; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance.

Authors:  D J Krusienski; E W Sellers; D J McFarland; T M Vaughan; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  A hybrid technique for blind separation of non-gaussian and time-correlated sources using a multicomponent approach.

Authors:  Petr Tichavský; Zbynek Koldovský; Arie Yeredor; Germán Gómez-Herrero; Eran Doron
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2008-03

7.  Performance measurement for brain-computer or brain-machine interfaces: a tutorial.

Authors:  David E Thompson; Lucia R Quitadamo; Luca Mainardi; Khalil Ur Rehman Laghari; Shangkai Gao; Pieter-Jan Kindermans; John D Simeral; Reza Fazel-Rezai; Matteo Matteucci; Tiago H Falk; Luigi Bianchi; Cynthia A Chestek; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  L A Farwell; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-12

9.  Classifier-based latency estimation: a novel way to estimate and predict BCI accuracy.

Authors:  David E Thompson; Seth Warschausky; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Matthias S Treder; Benjamin Blankertz
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.