| Literature DB >> 34988241 |
David E Thompson1, Md Rakibul Mowla1, Katie J Dhuyvetter1, Joseph W Tillman1, Jane E Huggins2.
Abstract
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) have been used to restore communication and control to people with severe paralysis. However, non-invasive BCIs based on electroencephalogram (EEG) are particularly vulnerable to noise artifacts. These artifacts, including electro-oculogram (EOG), can be orders of magnitude larger than the signal to be detected. Many automated methods have been proposed to remove EOG and other artifacts from EEG recordings, most based on blind source separation. This work presents a performance comparison of ten different automated artifact removal methods. Unfortunately, all tested methods substantially and significantly reduced P3 Speller BCI performance, and all methods were more likely to reduce performance than increase it. The least harmful methods were titled SOBI, JADER, and EFICA, but even these methods caused an average of approximately ten percentage points drop in BCI accuracy. Possible mechanistic causes for this empirical performance deduction are proposed.Entities:
Keywords: Brain-computer interfaces; P300 speller; artifacts rejection; physiological signals; signal processing
Year: 2020 PMID: 34988241 PMCID: PMC8725686 DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2020.1734401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon) ISSN: 2326-2621