Literature DB >> 3498809

Isolated asymptomatic microhematuria: a cross-sectional analysis of test-positive and test-negative patients.

D N Mohr1, K P Offord, L J Melton.   

Abstract

The relationship of asymptomatic microhematuria to urologic disease in a general population was studied by using population-based data resources in Rochester, Minnesota, to identify 635 patients with isolated asymptomatic microhematuria (AMs) and 635 controls. Prevalences of minor urologic diseases were 41.8% in those with positive tests (AMs) and 36.9% in controls (p greater than 0.05). Moderately serious urologic diseases were found in 16.7% of AMs and 9.2% of controls (p = 0.006); significant differences were found only for renal calculi and various causes of increased serum creatinine. Urologic cancers were found in 1.2% of AMs and 0.2% of controls (p = 0.04), but only prostatic carcinoma was found in a significantly higher percentage of those with positive tests (p = 0.047). Urologic cancers were found in 3.6% of test-positive patients with greater than 8 RBC/high-power field vs. 0.5% of those with 1-8 RBC/high-power field and 0.2% of controls (p greater than 0.05). The predictive value of low-grade isolated asymptomatic microhematuria is too low to be of value in screening for urologic cancers in unselected patients, and only certain moderately serious urologic diseases and prostatic cancer were more frequent in patients who had asymptomatic microhematuria than in controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3498809     DOI: 10.1007/BF02596166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  13 in total

1.  Study of five hundred patients with asymptomatic microhematuria.

Authors:  L F GREENE; E J O'SHAUGHNESSY; E D HENDRICKS
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1956-06-16

2.  The significance of hematuria in young men.

Authors:  E GARTMAN
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1956-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Importance of occult haematuria found at screening.

Authors:  C D Ritchie; E A Bevan; S J Collier
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-08

4.  Asymptomatic microhematuria and urologic disease.

Authors:  J E Heller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Unexplained hematuria. How extensive should the evaluation be?

Authors:  G V Burkholder; L N Dotin; W B Thomason; P D Beach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1969-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Urologic evaluation of hematuria occurring during anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  S J Antolak; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Clinical importance of microhematuria.

Authors:  C C Carson; J W Segura; L F Greene
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The patient record in epidemiology.

Authors:  L T Kurland; C A Molgaard
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Significance of microhaematuria in young adults.

Authors:  P Froom; J Ribak; J Benbassat
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-01-07

10.  Asymptomatic microhematuria and urologic disease. A population-based study.

Authors:  D N Mohr; K P Offord; R A Owen; L J Melton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Time to abandon testing for microscopic haematuria in adults?

Authors:  Per-Uno Malmström
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

2.  Microscopic haematuria. Is rarely significant if asymptomatic.

Authors:  J Stabler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-06

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of Common Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

Authors:  Joshua A Halpern; Bilal Chughtai; Hassan Ghomrawi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.