| Literature DB >> 34988080 |
Maria Moros1,2, Eugenio Fergola2, Valentina Marchesano2, Margherita Mutarelli2, Giuseppina Tommasini2, Beata Miedziak2, Giuliana Palumbo2, Alfredo Ambrosone2, Angela Tino2, Claudia Tortiglione2.
Abstract
Recent body of evidence demonstrates that extracellular vesicles (EVs) represent the first language of cell-cell communication emerged during evolution. In aquatic environments, transferring signals between cells by EVs offers protection against degradation, allowing delivering of chemical information in high local concentrations to the target cells. The packaging of multiple signals, including those of hydrophobic nature, ensures target cells to receive the same EV-conveyed messages, and the coordination of a variety of physiological processes across cells of a single organisms, or at the population level, i.e., mediating the population's response to changing environmental conditions. Here, we purified EVs from the medium of the freshwater invertebrate Hydra vulgaris, and the molecular profiling by proteomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed multiple markers of the exosome EV subtype, from structural proteins to stress induced messages promoting cell survival. Moreover, positive and negative regulators of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, the major developmental pathway acting in body axial patterning, were identified. Functional analysis on amputated polyps revealed EV ability to modulate both head and foot regeneration, suggesting bioactivity of the EV cargo and opening new perspectives on the mechanisms of developmental signalling. Our results open the path to unravel EV biogenesis and function in all cnidarian species, tracing back the origin of the cell-cell, cross-species or cross-kingdom communication in aquatic ecosystems.Entities:
Keywords: Hydra vulgaris; RNA-seq; aquatic invertebrate model; cell-cell communication; exosome; extracellular vesicles
Year: 2021 PMID: 34988080 PMCID: PMC8721104 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.788117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Morphological characterization of Hydra EV. (A) Dark-field image of a living Hydra vulgaris showing the simple body plan and (B) a schematic representation of the diploblastic tissue organization in a cross-section view. Epitheliomuscular cells (ecEP, yellow) face the outer medium and the inner cavity (enEP, pink). Interstitial stem cells (iSC, orange) lay interspersed into the ectoderm giving rise to a few differentiated cell types such as nematoblasts (i-nb), neurons (i-neur) and gland cells (i-gland). EV release into the medium is shown for a single ectodermal cell. (C) TEM image of isolated vesicles exhibiting round morphology and a bilayered membrane. Scale bar, 50 nm. (D) MRPS measurements show the distribution of the EV size, presenting two major peaks at 66 and 70.5 nm (using a TS-400 cartridge). (E) Schematic illustration of in vivo assembling of AuNP decorated EVs, by treatment of Hydra with AuNPs. (F) TEM analysis 48 h post treatment shows AuNPs on the surface of EVs. Scale bar 200 nm. (G) PKH67 labelled-EVs were incubated 2 h with living Hydra. The picture shows the body column with green fluorescent granular signals, clearly detectable also on fixed single cells (H) obtained by maceration of treated polyps. (I) Bright field image of the same cell. Scale bar 200 μm in (G), 20 μm in (H,I).
Name and putative function of selected proteins identified by ESI-MS/MS analysis.
| Accession No. | Protein name | Putative function | Matched peaks | Matched peptide | Mascot score | ExoCarta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| CDG70628 | Actin, cytoplasmic 1 | Cytoskeleton component | 18 | 16 | 235 | Yes |
| XP_002161913 | Tubulin beta chain | Cytoskeleton component | 10 | 8 | 169 | Yes |
| XP_004208788 | Tubulin alpha-1D chain | Cytoskeleton component | 5 | 4 | 41 | Yes |
|
| ||||||
| XP_012558692 | Fibrillin-1 | Microfibril assembly | 11 | 10 | 125 | Yes |
| XP_002166874 | Fibrillin-2 isoform X1 | Microfibril assembly | 9 | 7 | 107 | Yes |
| XP_002154154 | Latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 4-like | Extracellular matrix constituent | 12 | 12 | 80 | Yes |
|
| ||||||
| NP_001296699 | Annexin B12 | Calcium-dependent membrane binding | 7 | 4 | 100 | No |
| XP_004212135 | Protocadherin Fat 4, partial | Cell-cell adhesion | 7 | 7 | 89 | Yes |
| XP_004212674 | Protocadherin Fat 1, partial | Cell-cell adhesion | 17 | 17 | 71 | Yes |
| XP_012553809 | Annexin A4-like | Calcium-dependent membrane binding | 14 | 13 | 61 | Yes |
| XP_002165348 | CD151 antigen | Exosome marker | 5 | 5 | 56 | Yes |
| XP_004211099 | Usherin-like, partial | Integral component membrane | 2 | 2 | 47 | No |
|
| ||||||
| AAN87350 | 14-3-3 protein B | Growth adaptation to food supply | 2 | 2 | 54 | No |
| XP_002156827 | Ras-like GTP-binding protein RHO | Signal transduction | 2 | 2 | 52 | Yes |
| AEW90237 | Voltage-gated sodium channel Nav2.1, partial | Neuronal signaling in Hydra | 15 | 15 | 34 | No |
| XP_012554672 | cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II regulatory subunit-like isoform X2 | cAMP-mediated signaling pathway | 5 | 4 | 42 | Yes |
| XP_004209147 | Cell division control protein 42 homolog | Small GTPase-mediated signal transduction | 2 | 2 | 36 | No |
| AAW82079 | Thypedin | Foot formation stimulator | 5 | 5 | 57 | No |
|
| ||||||
| XP_002159321 | Syntenin-1-like isoform X2 | Biogenesis of exosomes | 9 | 8 | 99 | Yes |
| XP_002162060 | Programmed cell death 6-interacting protein | Multivesicular body biogenesis | 10 | 9 | 43 | Yes |
| XP_002155023 | Polyubiquitin-B | Vesicle cargo sorting | 11 | 7 | 43 | Yes |
| XP_002156816 | Uncharacterized protein LOC100207118 | Metalloproteinase with Thrombospondin motifs | 5 | 5 | 130 | — |
| CAJ33888 | Putative serine protease inhibitor | Protective function against excessive autophagy | 5 | 5 | 54 | No |
FIGURE 2Molecular contribution of cell lineages to the Hydra EV transcriptome. (A) Venn Diagram showing cell lineage contribution to the EV transcriptome. The clusters of cells included into each cell lineage were identified by scRNA-seq analysis recently reported (Siebert et al., 2019) and are listed in Supplementary Figure S5. (B) Distribution of EV transcripts matching the scRNA-seq atlas, subclustered according to their unique presence in a specific cell type of ectoderm (blue tones), interstitial (red tones) and endodermal (green tone) cell lineage. Transcripts common to multiple cell lineages are not included. (C) Anatomical source of EV transcripts. The distribution shows EV transcripts derived from all body regions, including the nerve net.
List of EV transcripts involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway matching the scRNA-seq database.
| Genes involved in Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene id | Gene id (NCBI) | Gene name | Wnt modulator | Lineage | Cell type | Anatomical region |
| t8678aep | 100,192,274 | Dickkopf 1/2/4-A | Negative regulator | Interstitial | i_zimogen gland cell | Body |
| t14102aep | 100,192,275 | dickkopf-like protein Dlp-1 | Negative regulator | Interstitial | i_zimogen gland cell | Body |
| t1688aep | 100,192,284 | β-catenin | Positive regulator | Ectoderm, Interstitial | Ec_battery cell, i_neuron/gland_cell_progenitor | Tentacle, Body |
| t29291aep | 101,237,470 | transcription factor Sp5-like | Negative regulator | Ectoderm, Endoderm | Ec_battery cell, En_head, En_tentacle | Head |
| t11826aep | 100,199,257 | Tcf | Positive regulator | Endoderm, Interstitial | En_head, i_neuron_ec | Head, Body |
| t34763aep | 100,205,238 | Naked cuticle | Negative regulator | Endoderm | En_head | Head |
| t13357aep | 100,199,272 | β-catenin-like protein 1 | Positive regulator | Interstitial | i_female germline1, i_male germline, i_nb1, i_neuron/gland cell progenitor, i_SC, i_stem cell/progenitor | Body |
| t14194aep | 100,203,050 | Wnt3 | Positive regulator | Endoderm | En_head | Head |
| t18735aep | 100,213,948 | FoxA/Budhead | Positive regulator | Interstitial | i_neuron/gland_cell_progenitor | Body |
| t31094aep | 100,215,335 | Foxd2-like | Endoderm | En_foot | Foot | |
| t16296aep | 100,199,630 | HAS-7 | Negative regulator | Interstitial | i_granular mucous gland cell, i_zymogen gland cell | Head, Body |
| t474aep | 100,214,250 | HmTSP | Negative regulator | Endoderm | En_tent-nem (pd), En_tentacle | Tentacle |
FIGURE 3Wnt signaling activation via Hydra EV. (A) Schematic view of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway at cellular level, in the activated state, showing extracellular and intracellular regulators identified in the Hydra EV transcriptome. (B) Relative mRNA expression levels of Wnt3/Ef1α. Whole polyps were treated for the indicated period with EVs freshly isolated from Hydra medium, then processed for RNA extraction and qRT-PCR. Data represent the average of three biological replicates (n = 60), each performed in triplicate and are presented as mean ±SD. Statistics was tested by two-sided unpaired t test. **p < 0.005 (p = 0.0015 for 24 h analysis and p = 0.0037 for 48 h analysis).
FIGURE 4Hydra head and foot regeneration are modulated by EVs. (A) Light microscopy images of regenerating polyps, grouped in four categories according to progressive developmental stage. (B) Histograms report the distribution of developmental stages at 40, 48 and 72 h post midgastric amputation (shown by the red dotted line). The bar color corresponds to the regenerative stages shown in (A). Data represent the average of three independent experiments (n = 70). Differences in the distributions of untreated and treated polyps were statistically evaluated using Chi squared test. At 40 h χ2 = 39.353 with 2 degrees of freedom. Two-tailed ***p value = 0.000057; at 48 h χ2 = 9.958 with 2 degrees of freedom. Two-tailed *p value = 0.0069; not significant differences resulted at 72 h: χ2 0.548 with 2 degrees of freedom. The two-tailed p value = 0.7605 (C) Light microscopy images of foot regenerates at different time post amputation (red dotted line). (D) Distribution of foot regenerating polyps grouped in three categories: light, medium and dark green, corresponding to low, medium and high peroxidase staining, determined as DAB positive area by using the ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 45). χ2 = 7.062 with 2 degrees of freedom. two-tailed *p value: 0.0293. (E) Representative images of foot regenerating polyps (untreated and treated with EVs) 24 h p.a.