| Literature DB >> 34987633 |
Chin Wen Png1,2, Wei Jie Jonathan Lee3,4,5, Shijia Joy Chua3, Feng Zhu3, Khay Guan Yeoh3,4,5, Yongliang Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Dysbiosis is associated with gastric cancer (GC) development. However, no longitudinal study was carried out to identify key bacteria that could predict for GC progression. Here, we aimed to investigate changes in bacterial metagenome prior to GC and develop a microbiome-based predictive model to accurately classify patients at risk of GC.Entities:
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; early gastric neoplasia; gastric cancer; intestinal metaplasia; microbiome
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34987633 PMCID: PMC8690935 DOI: 10.7150/thno.65302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.600
Figure 1Schematic diagram showing clinical features of patients at baseline and at subsequent follow up. Each circle denotes a single biopsy sample from the respective patients, whereby they are coloured according to their corresponding histological diagnosis: No IM (grey), Low risk IM (yellow), High risk IM (orange) or EGN (red).
Clinical parameters of patients' samples and sequenced map reads output used in this study.
| No IM | Low Risk IM | High Risk IM | Dysplasia | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 43 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 4 | - |
| Age (mean (SD)) | 54.82 (5.00) | 62.25 (7.49) | 64.33 (10.84) | 59.75 (5.74) | 0.011 |
| Sex = Male (%) | 6 (35.3) | 12 (75.0) | 5 (83.3) | 3 (75.0) | 0.055 |
| Clinical history of | 14 (82.4) | 9 (56.2) | 4 (66.7) | 4 (100.0) | 0.21 |
| IM grade (%) | < 0.001 | ||||
| Negative | 17 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (50.0) | - |
| Mild | 0 (0.0) | 3 (18.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
| Moderate | 0 (0.0) | 6 (37.5) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | - |
| Marked | 0 (0.0) | 7 (43.8) | 5 (83.3) | 2 (50.0) | - |
| Multi focal IM (%) | 0 (NaN) | 2 (12.5) | 6 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | NaN |
| Transition (%) | < 0.001 | ||||
| Baseline dysplasia | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) | - |
| Developed EGN | 1 (5.9) | 7 (43.8) | 5 (83.3) | 0 (0.0) | - |
| No subsequent EGN | 16 (94.1) | 9 (56.2) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | - |
| Map reads (mean (SD)) | 24246.41 (26665.40) | 17889.25 (13308.57) | 20217.00 (18521.55) | 20051.75 (19164.68) | 0.852 |
Figure 2Differentially abundant bacterial OTUs in patients with IM and EGN compared to patients with no IM. (A) Bar chart shows the log2 fold change (X-axis) differences in abundance of top bacterial taxa in low risk IM (L-IM), high risk IM (H-IM) or patients with dysplasia (EGN) compared to No IM group based on Deseq2 univariant analysis. All comparisons P < 0.05, *denotes Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P (Padj) < 0.1. (B) Box and whiskers plot showing increased Proteus bacteria in patients with dysplasia compared to No IM patients. ***P < 0.0007, FDR = 0.1, multivariant test (MaAsLin2).
Figure 3Specific gastric mucosal bacteria are predictive of disease progression to EGN. (A) Bar charts showing baseline OTUs (log10 relative abundance) that were significantly different between patients that progress to EGN compared to those who did not. (B) Model interpretation plots show the median relative feature weight (left barplot) of the top selected features, effect size, the robustness (percentages shown to the right of the barplot), and the feature z-scores across samples, ordered by group and classification score (right heatmap with annotations, black bar = positive status). HP denotes samples with prior clinical history of H. pylori infection. (C) Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and precision recall curves showing the performance of the model shown in (B). SIAMCAT package was used for all analysis and calculations.
Figure 4Gastric mucosal-associated microbiome functions by PICRUSt2 based on bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Bar plots show top differentially abundant (A) KEGG orthology (KO) features (P < 0.005) and (D) MetaCyc pathways (P < 0.05) in baseline samples from patients that progress to EGN and patients that do not progress. *denote Benjamini-Hochberg Padj < 0.01 (DESeq2). (C) Dot plot showing top enrichment KEGG pathways that were either activated or suppressed in samples from patients that progress to EGN compared to patients that do not. “padj” and “counts” denote Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P values and gene counts respectively. (D) Network plot showing KOs features and linkages associated with the enriched KEGG pathways.