| Literature DB >> 34987512 |
Yang Gao1, Wei Shan2,3,4,5, Tianning Gu2,3,4,5, Jie Zhang1, Yibo Wu2,3,4,5, Xiaoqing Li2,3,4,5, Xiangjun Zeng2,3,4,5, Hongyu Zhou1, Zhi Chen1, Haowen Xiao1,4.
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity in non-relapse patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). As the number of patients undergoing allo-HCT increases, it will become imperative to determine safe and effective treatment options for patients with GVHD, especially those who become refractory to systemic steroid therapy. Daratumumab (Dara), a humanized IgG1 (ĸ subclass) monoclonal antibody targeting the CD38 epitope, is used for the treatment of multiple myeloma. CD38 is a multifunctional ectoenzyme that behaves either as an enzyme, a cell adhesion molecule or a cell surface receptor involved in cell signaling. CD38 is also expressed on various immune effector and suppressor cells. However, the role of CD38 in the immune response remains elusive. We questioned whether CD38 is a potential therapeutic target against alloreactive T cells in the GVHD pathological process. Here, we investigated the impact of Dara on xenogeneic GVHD (xeno-GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects in a humanized murine model of transplantation, where human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were adoptively transplanted into immunocompromised NOD.SCID.gc-null (NSG) mice. Mice receiving Dara treatment experienced less weight loss, longer survival and lower GVHD scores compared with those in the control group. Histological evaluations, flow cytometry, RNA-sequencing and RT-qPCR analysis revealed that Dara efficaciously mitigated GVHD through multiple mechanisms including inhibition of the proliferation, activation and differentiation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, reduced expression of cytotoxic effector molecules, pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and chemoattractant receptors by T cells and promotion of immunosuppressive T cells. More importantly, Dara preserved the GVL effect in a humanized mouse model of leukemia by metabolic reprograming of T cells to promote the induction of Th17, Th1/17and Tc1/17 cells. Our findings indicate that Dara may be an attractive therapeutic option to separate GVHD from GVL effects in patients with hematopoietic malignancies receiving allo-HCT.Entities:
Keywords: CD38; chemoattractant receptor; chemokine; daratumumab; graft-versus-host disease; graft-versus-leukemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34987512 PMCID: PMC8720868 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.785774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Quantitative real-time PCR primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward primer (5’→3’) | Reverse primer (5’→3’) |
|---|---|---|
|
| GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC | TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA |
|
| CCTCTCTCTAATCAGCCCTCTG | GAGGACCTGGGAGTAGATGAG |
|
| AATTGTCTCCTTTTACTTCA | GTCATCTCGTTTCTTTTTGT |
|
| TACAACCGATCCACCTCACC | CATGTGGTAGTCCACGTTCC |
|
| AAAGACTGGGTGTTGACTGC | CCCTGGTTATTGAGTGAGCC |
|
| TCCTGAGAAGATGCAACCAA | CCAGATCATAAGATAAGCCAT |
|
| ACTTTGCAGCCCAGAAGACC | GTGCCGTAGTTGGAGATAAGC |
|
| GGCTCCCTGCCCATAAAACA | GGGCTCTTGCCAGGTCGTAG |
|
| ATGTGACCCAGATGATTGTGC | AAAGATATGCGTGTTGGAAGC |
|
| CAAAGTCCCTTGGAACCAGA | GAGTTGCATCCCCATAGTCA |
|
| CCACATCTCGTTCTCGGTTTATC | CAGGGAGCACCGTAATCATAATC |
|
| TTGCCAAACGCTTCTGCAAAT | AGTGGATCGGGTGTAAACTGA |
|
| AAACTGAAGCTCGCACTCTCG | TTGATTGCATCTGGCTGAGCG |
|
| GGCTCTCTGCAACCAGTTCTC | TCGCTTGGTTAGGAAGATGACAC |
|
| AAGCTCTGCGTGACTGTCCT | GCTGCTGGTCTCATAGTAATC |
|
| CCCTCGCTGTCATCCTCATT | AGCACTTGCCACTGGTGTAG |
Figure 1Dara alleviated xeno-GVHD. Mice receiving Dara treatment (n=20) achieved significantly longer survival (A), less weight loss (B) and lower GVHD scores (C) compared with control mice (n=20). (D, E) Compared with mice receiving Dara treatment, mice in the control group had significantly enlarged spleens (D), more evident tissue damage with lymphoid infiltration, endotheliitis, parenchymal alterations, hepatocyte apoptosis and portal tract expansion in the lung and liver, as determined by HE staining (original magnification, ×200), and less infiltration of human leukocytes, as determined by anti-human CD45+ (HuCD45+) staining in these GVHD targeted organs (original magnification, ×200) (E). (F) Histopathological scores were reduced in the lung and liver of Dara-treated mice (n=8) compared with controls (n=8). (G) Flow cytometry analysis showed that the rates of engrafted human leukocytes (HuCD45+)/mouse leukocytes (MoCD45+) were significantly lower in splenocytes, and the lung and liver from mice in the Dara-treated group (n=8) than those in the control group (n=8) on day 14 post-transplantation. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Dara reduced human T cell infiltration in GVHD-targeted organs. (A) The proportion of human CD3+ T cells engrafted in splenocytes was reduced in mice in the Dara-treated group (n=8) compared with those in the control group (n=8) on day 14 post-transplantation. (B–E) Flow cytometry and immunohistochemical staining (original magnification, ×200) showed that the infiltration of human CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in GVHD-targeted organs (lung and liver) was significantly reduced in mice treated with Dara compared with control mice. ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Dara induced a skewed proportion of T cell functional subsets. (A) A reduced frequency of CD8+ T cells, a higher frequency of CD4+ T cells, as well as a lower ratio of CD8+/CD4+ T cells were observed in the splenocytes of Dara-treated mice (n=8) compared with those from control mice (n=8) on day 14 post-transplantation. (B) Dara decreased the expression levels of Ki67 both on CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. (C) Dara had no significant effect of induction of apoptosis of T cells. The apoptosis rates in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from Dara-treated mice were comparable to those in T cells from control mice. (D) A significantly decreased frequency of CD69+ cells among CD8+ T cells was observed in Dara-treated mice, while this trend was not observed among CD4+ T cells. (E) CD8+ T cell subpopulations in splenocytes from Dara-treated mice showed enhanced frequencies of naïve T cells (CD45RA+CCR7+) and central memory T cells (TCM, CD45RA˗CCR7+), a decreased frequency of effector memory T cells (TEM, CD45RA˗CCR7˗) and no change in the frequency of terminally differentiated effector T cells. While, no inhibitory effect of Dara on CD4+ T cell differentiation was observed, with no significant increase in the frequencies of naïve/memory phenotypes. (F) Flow cytometry analysis showed that both the frequencies of Treg (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+) and Tfr (CD4+CXCR5+FoxP3+) cells were significantly higher in splenocytes obtained from Dara-treated mice than those from control mice at 14 days post-transplantation. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; NS P > 0.05.
Figure 4The impact of Dara on the whole gene expression profile of human T cells involved in xeno-GVHD and the effect of Dara on the metabolic regulation of T cells. (A) Transcriptome sequencing of sorted human CD3+ T cells engrafted into the spleen obtained from Dara-treated mice (n=3) or those from control mice (n=3) at 14 days post-transplantation. Pathway analysis of genes regulated by Dara in T cells. (B) Significantly decreased expression of transcription factors involved in the induction of T cell cytotoxic reactions and type I T cell differentiation, activation/immune response markers and adhesion molecules, was observed in human T cells from Dara-treated mice compared with those from control mice. While, significantly increased expression of transcription factor of Treg and Tfr, the FoxP3 gene, and genes known to suppress the immune response, were observed in human T cells from Dara-treated mice. (C, D) Genotypic characterization of infiltrated human T cells in Dara-treated mice revealed decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, cytotoxic effector molecules, chemokines and chemoattractant receptors. (E) Intracellular metabolic changes in human T cells after being cultured in the presence of Dara at 50ug/ml for 48h. (F) Genotypic characterization of infiltrated human T cells in Dara-treated mice revealed changed transcription levels of RYR1, PARP1, EZH2.
Impact of Dara on engrafted human T cell activation and migration.
| Parameter* | Method | Control (n=8) | Dara (n=8) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | SD | Median | SD | |||
|
| ||||||
| Functional subsets | FACS* | |||||
| IFNγ+ IL17A- T cells (Th1) | 76.31 | 3.52 | 60.15 | 1.56 | <0.0001 | |
| IFNγ- IL17A+ T cells (Th17) | 0.4 | 0.16 | 1.9 | 0.63 | <0.0001 | |
| IFNγ+ IL17A+ T cells (Th1/17) | 4.65 | 1.69 | 9.61 | 1.7 | <0.0001 | |
| Functional subsets | FACS | |||||
| IFNγ+ IL17A- T cells (Tc1) | 95.13 | 0.62 | 84.34 | 4.11 | <0.0001 | |
| IFNγ- IL17A+ T cells (Tc17) | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.015 | |
| IFNγ+ IL17A+ T cells (Tc1/17) | 1.84 | 0.66 | 4.41 | 1.33 | 0.0002 | |
| Granzyme A+ T cells | 70.05 | 8.01 | 53.05 | 9.07 | 0.0011 | |
| Granzyme B+ T cells | 68.21 | 8.53 | 31.48 | 9.97 | <0.0001 | |
|
| CBA* | |||||
| IFNγ | 509.21 | 248.4 | 132.25 | 73.41 | 0.0001 | |
| IL6 | 2.47 | 0.83 | 1.15 | 0.49 | 0.0002 | |
| IL10 | 24.06 | 23.44 | 1.92 | 2.36 | 0.0054 | |
| IL17A | 1.32 | 1.39 | 4.23 | 2.77 | 0.0054 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| RT-qPCR | |||||
| | RT-qPCR | |||||
| | 0.83 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.0275 | |
| | 0.72 | 0.48 | 8.93 | 6.03 | 0.0348 | |
| TBX21/T-bet | 0.95 | 0.08 | 0.77 | 0.08 | 0.021 | |
|
| RT-qPCR | |||||
| | 1.32 | 0.28 | 0.89 | 0.2 | 0.04 | |
| | 0.76 | 0.49 | 2.71 | 0.88 | 0.0081 | |
| GZMA/Granzyme A | 1.06 | 0.15 | 0.63 | 0.16 | 0.0069 | |
| GZMB/Granzyme B | 1.15 | 0.26 | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.0208 | |
| GNLY/Granulysin | 1.17 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.0002 | |
| PRF1/perforin | 1.06 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0218 | |
|
| RT-qPCR | |||||
|
| 0.86 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 0.0229 | |
|
| 1.05 | 0.27 | 0.5 | 0.21 | 0.0176 | |
|
| 0.96 | 0.13 | 0.44 | 0.15 | 0.0022 | |
|
| 1.11 | 0.33 | 0.62 | 0.18 | 0.0387 | |
|
| 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.014 | |
|
| 0.92 | 0.13 | 0.58 | 0.25 | 0.0498 | |
|
| RT-qPCR | |||||
|
| 0.95 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 0.2 | 0.0098 | |
|
| 1.08 | 0.15 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 0.0003 | |
|
| 1.42 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 0.3 | 0.0239 | |
|
| 0.83 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.2 | 0.0413 | |
*All parameters indicate human cells. Data show median values for 8–10 mice/condition with the interquartile range (IQR). FACS: flow cytometric analysis; CBA: Cytometric Bead Array.
Figure 5Dara preserves the GVL effect in a humanized mouse model of leukemia. Each experimental group included 10 mice. (A, B) Bioluminescence imaging (5 mice each experiment group presented) and quantification of bioluminescence (n=10) revealed that treatment with hPBMCs significantly reduced leukemia progression in the presence or absence of Dara during 3-4weeks post transplantation. After 4 weeks, this reduction in leukemia progression was most significant after treatment with hPBMCs in combination with Dara compared with hPBMCs treatment alone (P < 0.05). (C) Mice administered hPBMCs in combination with Dara treatment (n=10) showed superior survival rates compared with mice administered hPBMCs alone (n=10) or Dara treatment alone (n=10). (D, E) Compared with the high GVHD scores in mice receiving hPBMC alone, no GVHD (D) and no significant weight loss (E) were detected in mice receiving hPBMCs in combination with Dara. (F) Dara induced Th17 (IFNγ˗IL17A+CD4+), Th1/17 (IFNγ+ IL17A+CD4+) and Tc1/17 (IFNγ+IL17A+CD8+) proliferation in the humanized NSG-leukemia model. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; NS P > 0.05.