Xuhui Zhou1, Wenlong Li1, Hao Wang1, Chunzhu Li1, Hong Jiang1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Center for Specialty Strategy Research of Shanghai Jiao Tong University China Hospital Development Institute, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
The efficiency of many anesthetic regimens is controversial, with side effects especially in the vulnerable children and old population. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose combination of ketamine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine (KFD) for anesthesia and analgesia in the neonatal and elderly rats. KFD rapidly induced anesthesia and analgesia in either postnatal days 6 (P6) or 13 months (13M) old rats. Meanwhile, KFD administration had no adverse effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Compared with control group, there were no distinct morphologic changes in kidney, liver, and brain in KFD group. Moreover, administration of KFD had no influence on hepatic and renal function in rats of both ages. Furthermore, there was no obvious difference in cognitive function between control and KFD groups. These results indicated that the administration of KFD combination offered safe and efficient anesthesia. Collectively, our results suggest the potential implication of the KFD combination in anesthesia management.
The efficiency of many anesthetic regimens is controversial, with side effects especially in the vulnerable children and old population. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose combination of ketamine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine (KFD) for anesthesia and analgesia in the neonatal and elderly rats. KFD rapidly induced anesthesia and analgesia in either postnatal days 6 (P6) or 13 months (13M) old rats. Meanwhile, KFD administration had no adverse effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Compared with control group, there were no distinct morphologic changes in kidney, liver, and brain in KFD group. Moreover, administration of KFD had no influence on hepatic and renal function in rats of both ages. Furthermore, there was no obvious difference in cognitive function between control and KFD groups. These results indicated that the administration of KFD combination offered safe and efficient anesthesia. Collectively, our results suggest the potential implication of the KFD combination in anesthesia management.
Anesthetics are frequently used in surgery and interventional procedures for people
of all ages. Amounts of neonates and young children are exposed to anesthesia every year.
Meanwhile, as the global population ages rapidly, the number of elderly
patients undergoing surgery is also increasing.[2,3] The developing and aging brain
may be vulnerable to anesthesia.
Animal investigations suggest the potential “double-edged” sword of
anesthetics administration in the young; these anesthetics may have neuroprotective
effects in certain circumstances, but can be neurotoxic in others.
Furthermore, in recent decades, growing evidence shows that multiple or
prolonged exposure to general anesthesia in early infancy has the potentials for
long-lasting behavioral deficits later in life.[6,7] Moreover, it has been
demonstrated that delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction often occur in
older people after anesthesia/surgery.[8-10] Physiology, as well as the
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs, change with age, and these may
affect the anesthetic management, adverse reactions, postoperative recovery, and
outcomes. A balance must be struck between the potential toxicity and the importance
of providing adequate anesthesia. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that
anesthesia regimes are safe and effective in neonates, children, and older
patients.Ketamine is a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist that is widely used to induce
anesthesia and analgesia in clinic.
However, ketamine can cause undesirable adverse effects, including emergence
agitation and increased blood pressure.
And it was found that ketamine administered to pregnant rats in the second
trimester causes long-lasting behavioral disorders in offspring.
Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective and short-acting α2-adrenoreceptor
agonist, is used for sedation and analgesia in clinical practice and shows an
anesthetic-sparing effect.[14,15] It has been reported that dexmedetomidine can attenuate
isoflurane-induced neurocognitive impairment in neonatal rats.
And Wang et al
found that dexmedetomidine can protect the immune function, and relieve
perioperative stress and inflammation of surgical patients, all of which may help to
reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical outcomes. Studies have shown
that combination of dexmedetomidine and subanesthetic doses of ketamine provides
effective sedation and analgesia in clinical setting and reduces each other’s side
effects.[18,19] Fentanyl, a full agonist with high selectivity for the μ-opioid
receptor, is often used to relieve anxiety and to alleviate pain associated with surgery.
It is characterized by fast onset and short duration.
Due to pharmacokinetic features and adverse effects of anesthetics, they are
not administered alone but often combined with other anesthetics. The combination of
drugs with different pharmacological mechanisms may provide greater anesthesia and
analgesia effect than each drug given alone, with further anesthetic-sparing
effect.[22-24] In previous
studies, we showed that the low-dose combination of ketamine, fentanyl, and
dexmedetomidine (KFD) offered safe and efficient anesthesia in adults.[25,26] However, it
is unknown whether the KFD combination is safe and effective for neonates and the
elderly.In consideration of age-related differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
of anesthetic drugs, the present study was undertaken to investigate the anesthetic,
analgesic, and physiological effects of KFD (ketamine, 10 mg/kg; fentanyl,
.01 mg/kg; dexmedetomidine, .1 mg/kg) combination; the effects of administration of
KFD combination on histomorphology and clinical biochemistry values of kidney,
liver, and brain; and the cognitive function after treatment of KFD combination in
neonatal and aged rats.
Methods
Animals
Sprague-Dawley rats (postnatal day 6 or 13 months old, male) were used in this
study. The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the
Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
(Shanghai, China), and all methods were performed in accordance with the
relevant guidelines. Rats were maintained in a temperature-controlled
environment under a 12 h light/dark cycle (07:00 am to 07:00
pm). Food and water were provided ad libitum.
Anesthesia
Ketamine (Gutian Medical, Inc., Fujian, China; 50 mg/mL), dexmedetomidine (Guorui
Medical, Inc., Sichuan, China; .1 mg/mL), and fentanyl (Humanwell
Pharmaceutical, Yichang, China; .05 mg/mL) were dissolved in a sterile saline
solution (Chimin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China) before
intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) at 10 mL/kg body weight. The drug doses were
selected on the basis of previous studies with slight modifications.[25,26]The anesthetic and analgesic effects were evaluated by the duration of the
ketamine-induced loss of righting reflex (LORR) and the absence of the pain
reflex, and we tested these indicators as previously reported.
The anesthesia time was divided into the following intervals: (1) The
induction time defined as the time from the anesthetics administration to
complete LORR; (2) The analgesia onset time defined as the time from the
anesthetics administration to complete no response to toe pinch; (3) The
duration of analgesia time defined as the time from the absence of the limb
withdrawal reflex to the return of the tail flick and limb withdrawal reflex;
(4) The duration of LORR (Fig.
1A).
Figure 1.
The schematic diagram of the evaluation of anesthesia and MWM
experiment design. (A) The anesthesia time was divided into 4
intervals. After rats were anesthetized, the duration of LORR and
analgesia were recorded. (B) Design of MWM experiment. KFD:
combination of 10 mg/kg ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg
dexmedetomidine; the combination of anesthetics was administered in
a single injection.
The schematic diagram of the evaluation of anesthesia and MWM
experiment design. (A) The anesthesia time was divided into 4
intervals. After rats were anesthetized, the duration of LORR and
analgesia were recorded. (B) Design of MWM experiment. KFD:
combination of 10 mg/kg ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg
dexmedetomidine; the combination of anesthetics was administered in
a single injection.
Histopathology
Six hours after administration of the anesthetics, rats were sacrificed and
kidney, liver, and brain were collected as previously described.
The main lobe of kidney, liver, and brain were fixed in 10% neutral
buffered formalin for histological examination. Tissue sections were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). The specimens were evaluated by light
microscopy.
Serological Analysis
Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and blood was collected from the fundus
vein of each animal before anesthetics administration (0 h) and at .5, 12, 24,
and 48 h after anesthetics injection. Then, the blood samples were centrifuged
at 4°C and 4000 g for 10 min to obtain 200 μL of serum for testing. Serum
alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), creatinine (CREA),
and urea were determined using an automatic Hitachi Clinical Analyzer Model 7080
(Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Surface Electrocardiography (ECG)
Once anesthetics administration was completed and the righting reflex was lost,
the rats were placed in the supine position on a Mouse Monitor S (Indus
Instruments) heating pad with needle ECG leads and recorded according to the
manufacturer’s recommendations. The respiratory rate and SpO2 were
measured using the same equipment.
Morris Water Maze
One month after saline or KFD administration, rats received Morris water maze
(MWM) test for spatial learning and memory abilities. The MWM apparatus included
a black circular pool with the following dimensions: 160 cm in diameter and
50 cm in height and filled with warm water at 23°C. A 10-cm-diameter platform
was submerged 2 cm below the water surface. The acquisition phase included 3
trials each day for 4 consecutive days. During each trial, the rats were
released into the water from a specific starting point located at the quadrant
opposite the platform. The time to find the platform and the distance swum
before reaching the platform were recorded, and the rats were allowed to swim
freely until they reached the platform in 2 min and stayed on it for 30 s. If
the rats did not locate the platform, they were gently guided to the platform
and were allowed to rest on it for 30 s, and the latency was recorded as 120 s.
On the fifth day, the rats were tested on a spatial probe trial in which the
platform was removed, and they were allowed to swim freely for 120 s (Fig. 1B). The time to
reach the platform initially, the ratio of time spent in the range around the
platform as determined by software, and the number of times that the rats
crossed the platform was recorded.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (standard deviation). Student’s
t-test (2-tailed) was employed to analyze data unless
otherwise mentioned. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.11.5
software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of less than .05 was considered
statistically significant.
Results
Anesthetic and Analgesic Effects of KFD in P6 and 13M Rats
After intraperitoneal injection of KFD, the anesthetic and analgesic effects were
recorded. As shown in Table 1, treatment with KFD rapidly induced LORR in P6 (1.51 ± .05
min) and 13M (4.95 ± .17 min) rats. The analgesia onset time of KFD in P6 and
13M rats were 4.07 ± .39 min and 8.33 ± .32 min, respectively. We found that the
analgesic duration of KFD was longer in 13M (112.08 ± 4.75 min) rats than in the
P6 rats (49.30 ± .21 min), and the duration of LORR was similar in both ages
(P6, 172.34 ± .82 min; 13M, 193.12 ± 5.88 min).
Table 1.
Anesthetic and Analgesic Effects in P6 or 13M SD Rats after Injected
with KFD.
Age
Induction Time (min)
Analgesia Onset Time (min)
Duration of Analgesia (min)
Duration of LORR (min)
P6
1.51 ± .05
4.07 ± .39
49.30 ± .21
172.34 ± .82
13M
4.95 ± .17
8.33 ± .32
112.08 ± 4.75
193.12 ± 5.88
KFD: 10 mg/kg of ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg of
dexmedetomidine. The data were presented as mean ± SEM, n =
3-6.
Anesthetic and Analgesic Effects in P6 or 13M SD Rats after Injected
with KFD.KFD: 10 mg/kg of ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg of
dexmedetomidine. The data were presented as mean ± SEM, n =
3-6.
KFD had No Obvious Adverse Effects on the Cardiovascular and Respiratory
Systems
In a previous study, we found no adverse effects of KFD on the cardiovascular and
respiratory systems in adult rats.
However, it is unclear whether KFD administration affects these systems
in neonatal and old rats. Therefore, in this study, we determined the effects of
KFD treatment on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems of P6 and 13M rats.
Heart rates, respiratory rates and SpO2 were detected during 150 min
of anesthesia. We found that the heart rate of the both ages of rats in KFD
group decreased during anesthesia compared with the control group (Tables 2 and 3), consistent with
our previous study in adult rats.
Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in respiratory rate and
SpO2 between KFD and control groups. The results indicated that
KFD administration did not cause adverse cardiovascular and respiratory
reactions in P6 and 13M rats.
Table 2.
Physiological Parameters during 30 min of Anesthesia in P6 Rats.
Time (min)
PhysiologicalParameters
CON
KFD
2
HR (brpm)
331.00 ±
3.40
272.00 ±
1.25***
RR (bpm)
60.67 ±
3.14
52.33 ± .27
SpO2 (%)
91.67 ± .69
94.40 ± .81
5
HR (brpm)
332.33 ±
2.18
269.33 ±
.72***
RR (bpm)
59.33 ±
6.82
48.67 ±
2.72
SpO2 (%)
89.90 ±
1.75
91.63 ±
1.78
10
HR (brpm)
343.00 ±
6.98
263.00 ±
1.41***
RR (bpm)
56.33 ±
3.14
60.33 ±
10.79
SpO2 (%)
89.53 ±
1.85
94.07 ±
2.43
15
HR (brpm)
349.00 ±
11.84
254.00 ±
3.30**
RR (bpm)
64.00 ± .47
52.33 ±
6.13
SpO2 (%)
90.40 ±
1.40
93.37 ±
2.36
20
HR (brpm)
327.33 ±
8.28
251.33 ±
5.17**
RR (bpm)
56.00 ±
3.74
51.00 ± .00
SpO2 (%)
92.03 ±
1.14
92.33 ±
1.58
30
HR (brpm)
337.00 ±
2.49
254.00 ±
4.72***
RR (bpm)
59.33 ±
2.99
55.00 ±
3.27
SpO2 (%)
90.97 ±
1.58
91.93 ± .50
KFD, 10 mg/kg of ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg of
dexmedetomidine; CON, saline injection; HR, heart rate; RR,
respiratory rate. The data were presented as mean ± SEM, n =
6.
**P < .01, ***P < .001 vs
CON.
Table 3.
Physiological Parameters during 30 min of Anesthesia in 13M Rats.
Time (min)
Physiological Parameters
CON
KFD
2
HR (brpm)
410.67 ±
2.84
281.33 ±
7.15***
RR (bpm)
48.00 ±
2.87
48.67 ±
5.44
SpO2 (%)
99.63 ± .30
100.00 ±
.00
5
HR (brpm)
409.33 ±
2.76
274.67 ±
6.13***
RR (bpm)
44.00 ±
2.45
48.33 ±
3.41
SpO2 (%)
99.67 ± .27
99.80 ± .08
10
HR (brpm)
414.67 ± 2.72
270.33 ±
5.68***
RR (bpm)
51.33 ± .27
52.00 ±
5.44
SpO2 (%)
100.00 ±
.00
100.00 ±
.00
15
HR (brpm)
414.67 ±
1.96
265.33 ±
4.72***
RR (bpm)
44.67 ±
2.60
52.00 ±
5.44
SpO2 (%)
99.67 ± .27
99.90 ± .08
20
HR (brpm)
413.67 ±
3.21
259.33 ±
4.46***
RR (bpm)
47.67 ±
2.72
52.00 ± .47
SpO2 (%)
99.77 ± .19
99.70 ± .24
30
HR (brpm)
418.00 ±
2.49
249.33 ±
1.66***
RR (bpm)
48.00 ±
2.87
52.33 ± .47
SpO2 (%)
99.67 ± .27
99.87 ± .11
KFD, 10 mg/kg of ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg of
dexmedetomidine; CON, saline injection. The data were presented
as mean ± SEM, n = 6. HR, heart rate; RR, respiratory rate.
***
<.001 vs CON.
Physiological Parameters during 30 min of Anesthesia in P6 Rats.KFD, 10 mg/kg of ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg of
dexmedetomidine; CON, saline injection; HR, heart rate; RR,
respiratory rate. The data were presented as mean ± SEM, n =
6.**P < .01, ***P < .001 vs
CON.Physiological Parameters during 30 min of Anesthesia in 13M Rats.KFD, 10 mg/kg of ketamine, .01 mg/kg fentanyl, and .1 mg/kg of
dexmedetomidine; CON, saline injection. The data were presented
as mean ± SEM, n = 6. HR, heart rate; RR, respiratory rate.***
<.001 vs CON.
Histopathology Examination
Given the potential toxicity of anesthetics to kidney, liver, and
brain,[27-30] we investigated the
toxicity of a single injection of KFD to these tissues in P6 and 13M rats. As
shown in Fig. 2, KFD
administration did not cause histomorphologic changes in kidney, liver, and
brain compared with the control group.
Figure 2.
Six hours after anesthetic administration, rats (n = 5) were
sacrificed. Then the kidneys (A and D), livers (B and E), and brain
(C and F) were collected and stained with HE (×40).
Six hours after anesthetic administration, rats (n = 5) were
sacrificed. Then the kidneys (A and D), livers (B and E), and brain
(C and F) were collected and stained with HE (×40).
Hepatic and Renal Function Examination
Considering that liver and kidney are the major organs for drug metabolism and
clearance, we further examined the effects of KFD combination on these 2
tissues. Since P6 rats are not suitable for blood collection at multiple time
points, serological analysis was performed on 13M rats only. As shown in Fig. 3, the serum levels
of ALT, AST, urea, and CREA in KFD group were not notably different from those
in control groups. These results revealed that KFD combination had no
significant effect on hepatic and renal function.
Figure 3.
The detection of serum markers levels. At 0, .5, 12, 24, and 48 h
after injection with KFD, the levels of serum ALT (A), AST (B), UREA
(C), and CREA (D) were assessed. The data were presented as mean ±
SEM, n = 3.
The detection of serum markers levels. At 0, .5, 12, 24, and 48 h
after injection with KFD, the levels of serum ALT (A), AST (B), UREA
(C), and CREA (D) were assessed. The data were presented as mean ±
SEM, n = 3.
KFD had No Influence on Cognitive Function
Emerging evidence suggests that anesthesia can induce cognitive dysfunction in
neonates and older patients.[7,31] Thus, we further
determined the effects of KFD combination on learning and memory skills in P6
and 13M rats. We performed MWM test on the rats to assess their learning and
memory abilities 1 month after the drug treatment. We found that a single
exposure to KFD anesthesia at P6 or 13M had no obvious effect on rats’ cognitive
function at P36 (Fig.
4A-E) or 14M (Fig.
4F-J), respectively. There was no apparent difference in the latency
to find the platform and the swim distance between the KFD and control groups
(Fig. 4, A, B, F, and
G). The number of attempts to across the platform or the ratio of
time spent in the range around the platform on the testing day of the KFD group
was similar to those of the control group (Fig. 4, C, D, H, and I). Meanwhile,
representative traces of the paths swum by the rats in the spatial probe test
are also shown, with the platform encircled in blue and the range around the
platform marked in orange (Fig. 4E and J). These results revealed that KFD did not affect the
cognitive function of the rats at the tested age.
Figure 4.
KFD had no effect on the cognitive function of neonatal and old rats.
One month after P6 or 13M rats treated with KFD combination, the MWM
test was performed. There were no differences in the latency to find
the platform (A and F) and swim distance (B and G) between KFD and
control group. The number of attempts to across the platform (C and
H) and ratio of time spent in the range around the platform (D and
I) of the KFD group were similar with the control group. (E and J)
Representative traces of the movement of the rats in the spatial
probe test. The blue circle represents the removed platform, and the
orange represents the range around the platform. The data were
presented as mean ± SEM. n = 12-16.
KFD had no effect on the cognitive function of neonatal and old rats.
One month after P6 or 13M rats treated with KFD combination, the MWM
test was performed. There were no differences in the latency to find
the platform (A and F) and swim distance (B and G) between KFD and
control group. The number of attempts to across the platform (C and
H) and ratio of time spent in the range around the platform (D and
I) of the KFD group were similar with the control group. (E and J)
Representative traces of the movement of the rats in the spatial
probe test. The blue circle represents the removed platform, and the
orange represents the range around the platform. The data were
presented as mean ± SEM. n = 12-16.
Discussion
The advent of anesthesia made it possible for the development of complex surgery in
patients of all age groups. Notably, children are exposed to anesthetics for far
more than surgical procedures. Because neonates and young children lack the ability
to fully self-regulate or understand the norms of the situation, they have
difficulty cooperating during minimally invasive operation or radiological imaging
procedures. Moreover, as the global population is aging, the number of older
patients undergoing surgery is also increasing.[32,33] Due to age-related changes in
physiology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may influence the anesthetic
efficacy and side effects, special attention is required for anesthetic management
of young and older patients.Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic with potent analgesic properties, which is
widely used in pediatrics.
Fentanyl is a short-acting synthetic opioid used worldwide. It produces
analgesia by binding to opioid receptors.
Dexmedetomine, a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist, has been
increasingly used as a general anesthetic adjuvant.
In the present study, we demonstrated that the low-dose combination of KFD is
a safe and effective anesthetic formula for neonatal and old rats. The drug doses
were selected on the basis of previous studies with slight modifications.[25,26] And in pilot
experiments, we found that the combined doses of KFD used in our study were the
minimum doses required to maintain stable anesthesia for more than 30 min in P6
rats. Additionally, the doses also had a good anesthetic effect on the elderly rats,
so we chose the same doses for the experiments on the aged rats. Collectively, we
found that KFD combination rapidly induced anesthesia and analgesia in rats of both
ages, and the duration of LORR and analgesia of KFD was long, which was consistent
with our previous study.[25,26] The data indicated that KFD may be a good option for long-term
operation.In consideration of the potential effects of anesthetics on the cardiovascular and
respiratory systems,[37,38] we tested the heart and respiratory rates, and SpO2
of neonatal and old rats after KFD treatment. Compared with the control group,
administration of KFD led to a lower heart rate during anesthesia. Moreover, the
respiratory rate and SpO2 of KFD group were similar with the control
group. Since anesthetics may be toxic to the kidney, liver, and brain,[39,40] we further
examined the morphological changes of these tissues after KFD administration. The
results of this study showed that KFD had no influence on the histomorphology of
these tissues in neonatal and old rats. Furthermore, serological analysis showed no
significant differences in ALT, AST, urea, and CREA levels between KFD and control
groups, suggesting that KFD combination had no effect on hepatic and renal
function.Previous studies have indicated that prolonged exposure to general anesthetics may
affect neurodevelopment in neonatal rats.
What’s more, cognitive decline is common in the elderly after anesthesia and
surgery.[41,42] Therefore, we performed MWM test on the neonatal and old rats
to detect their learning and memory skills 1 month after the KFD treatment. We found
that the KFD groups performed similarly compared with the control groups in rats of
both ages. These results indicated that KFD combination did not affect brain
function. Although in vivo results showed that the combination of KFD was safe and
effective, our study still had some experimental limitations, such as the absence of
investigations on cell injuries at cellular or sub-cellular level of vital organs
and the absence of measurements of blood gases and blood pressure due to technique
challenges. In consideration of reports and our previous study suggesting that there
may be no gender difference in the effect of anesthetics,[26,43] male animals were selected
for this study. In addition, the anesthetics we selected are all commonly used in
the clinical practice, and their doses in the combination were significantly lower
than those used alone. However, more studies are needed in the future to further
clarify the effects and dosages of KFD in human.In conclusion, our study demonstrated that low-dose combination of KFD provided
stable anesthesia in neonatal and old rats and may be suitable for prolonged
procedures. KFD treatment did not impact the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.
Additionally, administration of KFD had no influence on the renal, hepatic, and
cognitive functions of rats at either age. These results suggested that KFD
combination was a safe and effective anesthetic formulation for neonatal and elderly
rats.
Authors: Karol Mathews; Peter W Kronen; Duncan Lascelles; Andrea Nolan; Sheilah Robertson; Paulo Vm Steagall; Bonnie Wright; Kazuto Yamashita Journal: J Small Anim Pract Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 1.522
Authors: David O Warner; Michael J Zaccariello; Slavica K Katusic; Darrell R Schroeder; Andrew C Hanson; Phillip J Schulte; Shonie L Buenvenida; Stephen J Gleich; Robert T Wilder; Juraj Sprung; Danqing Hu; Robert G Voigt; Merle G Paule; John J Chelonis; Randall P Flick Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Danqing Hu; Randall P Flick; Michael J Zaccariello; Robert C Colligan; Slavica K Katusic; Darrell R Schroeder; Andrew C Hanson; Shonie L Buenvenida; Stephen J Gleich; Robert T Wilder; Juraj Sprung; David O Warner Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.892