| Literature DB >> 34986887 |
Harry-César Kayembe-Ntumba1, Felly Vangola2, Papy Ansobi3, Germain Kapour3, Eric Bokabo3, Bien-Aimé Mandja3, Didier Bompangue3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overall, 1.8 million children fail to receive the 3-dose series for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis each year in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Currently, an emergency plan targeting 9 provinces including Kinshasa, the capital of the DRC, is launched to reinforce routine immunization. Mont Ngafula II was the only health district that experienced high vaccination dropout rates for nearly five consecutive years. This study aimed to identify factors predicting high immunization dropout rates among children aged 12-23 months in the Mont Ngafula II health district.Entities:
Keywords: Children; DRC; Dropout rate; Mont Ngafula II health district; Predictors; Vaccination
Year: 2022 PMID: 34986887 PMCID: PMC8728983 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00782-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Fig. 1Study area.
Routine immunization schedule in the DRC
| Timing | Vaccine |
|---|---|
| Birth | Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) |
| 6, 10, 14 weeks | OPV, Pentavalent vaccine (DTP, Haemophilus Influenzae type B and Hepatitis B), Pneumococcal Vaccine, and Rotavirus vaccine each time |
| 9 months | Measles and Yellow fever vaccines |
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants, Mont Ngafula II health district, DRC, 2019
| Variables | Number | Percent (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 210 | 50.2 |
| Male | 208 | 49.8 | |
| Birth order | ≤2nd | 194 | 46.4 |
| ≥3rd | 224 | 53.6 | |
| Card possession | No | 42 | 10.0 |
| Yes | 376 | 90.0 | |
| Age group | ≤ 19 years | 32 | 7.7 |
| 20-29 years | 209 | 50.0 | |
| ≥ 30 years | 177 | 42.3 | |
| Occupation | Professional | 28 | 6.7 |
| Trader | 104 | 24.9 | |
| Unemployed | 228 | 54.5 | |
| Other | 58 | 13.9 | |
| Education level | Primary | 74 | 17.7 |
| Secondary | 292 | 69.9 | |
| Tertiary | 52 | 12.4 | |
| Place of residence | Rural | 152 | 36.4 |
| Urbain | 266 | 63.6 | |
| Type of family | Single parent family | 78 | 18.7 |
| 2-parents family | 340 | 81.3 | |
| Number of children | ≤2 | 385 | 92.1 |
| ≥3 | 33 | 7.9 | |
Respondents’ perceptions on the organization of vaccination in health facilities, Mont Ngafula II health district, DRC, 2019
| Perceptions | Number | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude of health staff during vaccination in health facilities | ||
| Bad | 25 | 6.0 |
| Good | 393 | 94.0 |
| Availability of seats during vaccination | ||
| No | 21 | 5.0 |
| Yes | 397 | 95.0 |
| Respect of the order of arrival during vaccination | ||
| No | 42 | 10.0 |
| Yes | 376 | 90.0 |
| Waiting time during vaccination in health facilities | ||
| < 1 h | 71 | 17.0 |
| ≥ 1 h | 347 | 83.0 |
| Existence of a reminder system on days before the scheduled vaccination | ||
| No | 246 | 58.9 |
| Yes | 172 | 41.1 |
Fig. 2Spatial distribution of 2017-2018 routine immunization coverage and dropout rate.
Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics and perceptions based on vaccination dropout status using Chi-square test, Mont Ngafula II health district, DRC, 2019
| Variables | No Dropout | Dropout | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child sex | Female | 115 | 54.8 | 95 | 45.2 | 210 | 0.914 |
| Male | 115 | 55.3 | 93 | 44.7 | 208 | ||
| Birth order | ≤2nd | 101 | 52.1 | 93 | 47.9 | 194 | 0.257 |
| ≥3rd | 129 | 57.6 | 95 | 42.4 | 224 | ||
| Card possession | No | 15 | 35.7 | 27 | 64.3 | 42 | 0.008 |
| Yes | 215 | 57.2 | 161 | 42.8 | 376 | ||
| Age | ≤ 19 years | 16 | 50.0 | 16 | 50.0 | 32 | 0.148 |
| 20-29 years | 124 | 59.3 | 85 | 40.7 | 209 | ||
| ≥ 30 years | 90 | 50.8 | 87 | 49.2 | 177 | ||
| Education level | Primary | 38 | 51.4 | 36 | 48.6 | 74 | 0.247 |
| Secondary | 168 | 57.5 | 124 | 42.5 | 292 | ||
| Tertiary | 24 | 46.2 | 28 | 53.8 | 52 | ||
| Occupation | Professional | 16 | 57.1 | 12 | 42.9 | 28 | 0.718 |
| Trader | 62 | 59.6 | 42 | 40.4 | 104 | ||
| Unemployed | 121 | 53.1 | 107 | 46.9 | 228 | ||
| Other | 31 | 53.4 | 27 | 46.6 | 58 | ||
| Place of residence | Rural | 75 | 49.3 | 77 | 50.7 | 152 | 0.078 |
| Urbain | 155 | 58.3 | 111 | 41.7 | 266 | ||
| Type of family | Single parent family | 42 | 53.8 | 36 | 46.2 | 78 | 0.817 |
| 2-parents family | 188 | 55.3 | 152 | 44.7 | 340 | ||
| Number of children | ≤2 | 214 | 55.6 | 171 | 44.4 | 385 | 0.431 |
| ≥3 | 16 | 48.5 | 17 | 51.5 | 33 | ||
| Attitude of health staff | Negative | 7 | 28.0 | 18 | 72.0 | 25 | 0.005 |
| Positive | 223 | 56.7 | 170 | 43.3 | 393 | ||
| Availability of seats | No | 2 | 9.5 | 19 | 90.5 | 21 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 228 | 57.4 | 169 | 42.6 | 397 | ||
| Respect of the order of arrival | No | 8 | 19.0 | 34 | 81.0 | 42 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 222 | 59.0 | 154 | 41.0 | 376 | ||
| Waiting time | >1 h | 188 | 54.2 | 159 | 45.8 | 347 | 0.443 |
| <1 h | 42 | 59.2 | 29 | 40.8 | 71 | ||
| Reminder system | No | 116 | 47.2 | 130 | 52.8 | 246 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 114 | 66.3 | 58 | 33.7 | 172 | ||
Predictors of high immunization dropout rate identified by multivariate logistic random effects regressions models
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Card possession (No vs. Yes) | 2.28 (1.13- 4.60) | 2.04 (0.93- 4.49) | ||
| Place of residence (Rural vs. Urban) | 1.92 (1.18-3.12) | 1.87 (1.12-3.14) | ||
| Availability of seats (No vs. Yes) | 7.91 (1.49-41.90) | 7.30 (1.30-40.87) | ||
| Respect of the order of arrival (No vs. Yes) | 3.52 (1.42-8.73) | 3.42 (1.36-8.61) | ||
| Reminder system (No vs. Yes) | 2.12 (1.34-3.34) | 2.04 (1.28-3.24) | ||
| Random effects variance (SE) | 0.52*(0.16) | 0.63*(0.18) | 0.56*(0.18) | 0.63*(0.19) |
| Model fit AIC | 564.6 | 562.9 | 531 | 526.7 |
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; SE, Standard Error; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion
Model 1 multivariate regression for children characteristics.
Model 2 multivariate regression for household characteristics.
Model 3 multivariate regression for respondents’ perceptions.
Model 4 final multivariate logistic random effects regression (chidren and household characteristics, and respondents’ perceptions).