| Literature DB >> 34986839 |
Ruisong Wang1,2, Rui Li3, Ruiyu Liu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms play a crucial role in the development of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study mainly explored the association of IL-6 variants and ONFH susceptibility among the Chinese Han population.Entities:
Keywords: IL-6; ONFH; Polymorphism; Susceptibility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34986839 PMCID: PMC8734317 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-01142-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Characteristics of ONFH patients and controls
| Variables | Cases (N = 566) | Control (N = 566) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 51.34 ± 14.51 | 51.10 ± 13.93 | 0.503a |
| ≤ 51 | 307 (54.2%) | 295 (52.1%) | |
| > 51 | 259 (45.8%) | 271 (47.9%) | |
| Sex | 0.858b | ||
| Male | 314 (55.5%) | 311 (55.0%) | |
| Female | 252 (44.5%) | 255 (45.0%) | |
| Smoking | |||
| Yes | 256 (45.2%) | 300 (53.0%) | |
| No | 310 (54.8%) | 266 (47.0%) | |
| Drinking | |||
| Yes | 293 (51.8%) | 285 (50.4%) | |
| No | 273 (48.2%) | 281 (49.6%) | |
| Stage | |||
| III/IV | 223 (39.0%) | ||
| I/II | 77 (14.0%) | ||
| Missing | 300 (47%) | ||
ap values were calculated from independent sample t-test
bp values were calculated from two-sided χ2 test
Basic information of SNPs in IL-6 gene
| SNP | Chr: position | Function | Allele (minor/major) | MAF in Case | MAF in Control | O (HET) | E (HET) | HWE | HaploReg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2069837 | 7: 22728408 | Intronic | G/A | 0.183 | 0.227 | 0.356 | 0.351 | 0.905 | Promoter histone marks; Enhancer histone marks; DNAse; Proteins bound; Motifs changed |
| rs13306435 | 7: 22731420 | Missense | A/T | 0.034 | 0.038 | 0.072 | 0.073 | 0.564 | Promoter histone marks; Enhancer histone marks; DNAse; Motifs changed |
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, MAF minor allele frequency, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
Associations between IL-6 polymorphisms and ONFH susceptibility
| SNP | Model | Genotype | Control | Case | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2069837 | Allele | A | 873 (77.3%) | 925 (81.7%) | 1.00 | |
| G | 257 (22.7%) | 207 (18.3%) | 0.76 (0.62–0.93) | |||
| Codominant | AA | 336 (59.5%) | 378 (66.8%) | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 28 (5%) | 19 (3.4%) | 0.61 (0.33–1.11) | 0.103 | ||
| AG | 201 (35.6%) | 169 (29.9%) | 0.75 (0.58–0.96) | |||
| Dominant | AA | 336 (59.5%) | 378 (66.8%) | 1.00 | ||
| GG + AG | 229 (40.5%) | 188 (33.2%) | 0.73 (0.57–0.93) | |||
| Recessive | AA + AG | 537 (95%) | 547 (96.6%) | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 28 (5%) | 19 (3.4%) | 0.67 (0.37–1.21) | 0.186 | ||
| Additive | / | 0.76 (0.62–0.93) | ||||
| rs13306435 | Allele | T | 1089 (96.2%) | 1094 (96.6%) | 1.00 | |
| A | 43 (3.8%) | 38 (3.4%) | 0.88 (0.56–1.37) | 0.572 | ||
| Codominant | TT | 524 (92.6%) | 528 (93.3%) | 1.00 | ||
| AA | 1 (0.2%) | 0 (0%) | / | / | ||
| AT | 41 (7.2%) | 38 (6.7%) | 0.92 (0.58–1.45) | 0.712 | ||
| Dominant | TT | 524 (92.6%) | 528 (93.3%) | 1.00 | ||
| AA + AT | 42 (7.4%) | 38 (6.7%) | 0.90 (0.57–1.41) | 0.634 | ||
| Recessive | TT + AT | 565 (99.8%) | 566 (100%) | 1.00 | ||
| AA | 1 (0.2%) | 0 (0%) | / | / | ||
| Additive | / | 0.88 (0.56–1.37) | 0.560 |
Bold indicates statistical signifcance (p < 0.05)
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
p values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted age and sex
Relationship between IL-rs2069837 and ONFH susceptibility in different subgroups
| SNP | Model | Genotype | Male | Female | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | OR (95% CI) | Case | Control | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| Sex | ||||||||||
| rs2069837 | Allele | A | 514 | 475 | 1.00 | 411 | 398 | 1.00 | ||
| G | 114 | 145 | 0.73 (0.55–0.96) | 93 | 112 | 0.80 (0.59–1.09) | 0.164 | |||
| Codominant | AA | 210 | 115 | 1.00 | 168 | 156 | 1.00 | |||
| GG | 10 | 15 | 0.57 (0.25–1.31) | 0.188 | 9 | 13 | 0.65 (0.27–1.55) | 0.329 | ||
| AG | 94 | 180 | 0.70 (0.50–0.98) | 75 | 86 | 0.81 (0.56–1.19) | 0.279 | |||
| Dominant | AA | 210 | 180 | 1.00 | 168 | 156 | 1.00 | |||
| GG + AG | 104 | 130 | 0.68 (0.49–0.95) | 84 | 99 | 0.79 (0.55–1.14) | 0.203 | |||
| Recessive | AA + AG | 304 | 295 | 1.00 | 243 | 242 | 1.00 | |||
| GG | 10 | 15 | 0.65 (0.29–1.47) | 0.300 | 9 | 13 | 0.69 (0.29–1.65) | 0.407 | ||
| Additive | / | / | / | 0.72 (0.54–0.95) | / | / | 0.81 (0.59–1.10) | 0.173 | ||
Bold indicates statistical signifcance (p < 0.05)
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
p values were calculated by logistic regression analysis adjusted age and sex
False positive report probability of the association rs2069837 and ONFH susceptibility in subgroups
| Model and variables | Genotype | OR (95% CI) | Statistical power | Prior probability | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.0001 | |||||
| Overall analysis | |||||||||
| Allele | G versus A | 0.76 (0.62–0.93) | 0.009 | 0.898 | 0.025b | 0.072b | 0.459 | 0.896 | 0.988 |
| Heterozygote | AG versus AA | 0.75 (0.58–0.96) | 0.023 | 0.825 | 0.075b | 0.196b | 0.729 | 0.964 | 0.996 |
| Dominant | GG + AG versus AA | 0.73 (0.57–0.93) | 0.011 | 0.769 | 0.041b | 0.113b | 0.583 | 0.934 | 0.993 |
| Additive | / | 0.76 (0.62–0.93) | 0.009 | 0.898 | 0.025b | 0.072b | 0.459 | 0.896 | 0.988 |
| Stratification analysis | |||||||||
| Male | |||||||||
| Allele | G versus A | 0.73 (0.55–0.96) | 0.023 | 0.997 | 0.068b | 0.180b | 0.707 | 0.961 | 0.996 |
| Heterozygote | AG versus AA | 0.70 (0.50–0.98) | 0.037 | 0.975 | 0.104b | 0.258 | 0.793 | 0.975 | 0.997 |
| Dominant | GG + AG versus AA | 0.68 (0.49–0.95) | 0.022 | 0.964 | 0.069b | 0.182b | 0.709 | 0.961 | 0.996 |
| Additive | / | 0.72 (0.54–0.95) | 0.022 | 0.995 | 0.057b | 0.154b | 0.668 | 0.953 | 0.995 |
| > 51 years | |||||||||
| Allele | G versus A | 0.69 (0.52–0.91) | 0.009 | 0.989 | 0.025b | 0.073b | 0.462 | 0.897 | 0.989 |
| Heterozygote | AG versus AA | 0.69 (0.49–0.98) | 0.036 | 0.964 | 0.106b | 0.263 | 0.797 | 0.975 | 0.997 |
| Dominant | GG + AG versus AA | 0.66 (0.48–0.92) | 0.015 | 0.949 | 0.043b | 0.119b | 0.597 | 0.937 | 0.993 |
| Additive | / | 0.68 (0.51–0.90) | 0.008 | 0.984 | 0.021b | 0.060b | 0.413 | 0.877 | 0.986 |
| Non-smoking | |||||||||
| Allele | G versus A | 0.72 (0.53–0.97) | 0.029 | 0.992 | 0.085b | 0.218 | 0.754 | 0.969 | 0.997 |
| Heterozygote | AG versus AA | 0.69 (0.48–0.99) | 0.046 | 0.960 | 0.121b | 0.292 | 0.819 | 0.979 | 0.998 |
| Dominant | GG + AG versus AA | 0.68 (0.48–0.96) | 0.029 | 0.960 | 0.081b | 0.210 | 0.745 | 0.967 | 0.997 |
| Additive | / | 0.71 (0.52–0.96) | 0.026 | 0.989 | 0.073b | 0.192b | 0.723 | 0.963 | 0.996 |
| Non-drinking | |||||||||
| Heterozygote | AG versus AA | 0.69 (0.48–1.00) | 0.048 | 0.956 | 0.136b | 0.320 | 0.838 | 0.981 | 0.998 |
| Dominant | GG + AG versus AA | 0.69 (0.49–0.98) | 0.040 | 0.964 | 0.106b | 0.263 | 0.797 | 0.975 | 0.997 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
ap < 0.05 indicates statistical significance
bThe level of false positive report probability threshold was set at 0.2 and noteworthy findings are presented
Fig. 1The potential function of IL-6. A Protein–protein interaction network of IL-6; B GO analysis of IL-6; C KEGG pathway analysis of IL-6