Literature DB >> 34986564

Supposedly identical microplastic particles substantially differ in their material properties influencing particle-cell interactions and cellular responses.

A F R M Ramsperger1, J Jasinski2, M Völkl3, T Witzmann4, M Meinhart5, V Jérôme3, W P Kretschmer6, R Freitag3, J Senker5, A Fery4, H Kress7, T Scheibel2, C Laforsch8.   

Abstract

Microplastics and its putative adverse effects on environmental and human health increasingly gain scientific and public attention. Systematic studies on the effects of microplastics are currently hampered by using rather poorly characterised particles, leading to contradictory results for the same particle type. Here, surface properties and chemical composition of two commercially available nominally identical polystyrene microparticles, frequently used in effect studies, were characterised. We show distinct differences in monomer content, ζ-potentials and surface charge densities. Cells exposed to particles showing a lower ζ-potential and a higher monomer content displayed a higher number of particle-cell-interactions and consequently a decrease in cell metabolism and proliferation, especially at higher particle concentrations. Our study emphasises that no general statements can be made about the effects of microplastics, not even for the same polymer type in the same size class, unless the physicochemical properties are well characterised.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CP-AFM; Cellular internalisation; Cytotoxicity; EDX; GPC; Material properties; Microplastic; NMR; ζ-potential

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34986564     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bioanalytical approaches for the detection, characterization, and risk assessment of micro/nanoplastics in agriculture and food systems.

Authors:  Chenxu Yu; Paul Takhistov; Evangelyn Alocilja; Jose Reyes de Corcuera; Margaret W Frey; Carmen L Gomes; Yu J Mao; Eric S McLamore; Mengshi Lin; Olga V Tsyusko; Tzuen-Rong J Tzeng; Jeong-Yeol Yoon; Anhong Zhou
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.478

2.  Microplastics Affect the Inflammation Pathway in Human Gingival Fibroblasts: A Study in the Adriatic Sea.

Authors:  Sergio Caputi; Francesca Diomede; Paola Lanuti; Guya Diletta Marconi; Piero Di Carlo; Bruna Sinjari; Oriana Trubiani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Quantification of photooxidative defects in weathered microplastics using 13C multiCP NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Anika Mauel; Björn Pötzschner; Nora Meides; Renée Siegel; Peter Strohriegl; Jürgen Senker
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  [Microplastic and dermatological care].

Authors:  Susanne Saha; Christian Laforsch; Anja Ramsperger; Dennis Niebel
Journal:  Dermatologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 5.  Coronas of micro/nano plastics: a key determinant in their risk assessments.

Authors:  Jiayu Cao; Qing Yang; Jie Jiang; Tatenda Dalu; Aliaksei Kadushkin; Joginder Singh; Rawil Fakhrullin; Fangjun Wang; Xiaoming Cai; Ruibin Li
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 9.112

6.  Alcohol Pretreatment to Eliminate the Interference of Micro Additive Particles in the Identification of Microplastics Using Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Dunzhu Li; Emmet D Sheerin; Yunhong Shi; Liwen Xiao; Luming Yang; John J Boland; Jing Jing Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 11.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.