Tina Savvaides1,2, Jeremy P Koelmel1, Yakun Zhou1, Elizabeth Z Lin1, Paul Stelben1, Juan J Aristizabal-Henao3, John A Bowden3, Krystal J Godri Pollitt4. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, Room 510, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. 2. Department of Chemistry, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Human and Environmental Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, Room 510, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. krystal.pollitt@yale.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a family of more than 7,000 fluorinated compounds. The carbon-fluorine bond of PFAS provides desirable hydrophobic and oleophobic properties and stability that has led to widespread usage in consumer products and industrial applications. The strength of the carbon-fluorine bond also prevents appreciable degradation once released into the environment. Consequently, various household products can release volatile and nonvolatile PFAS into the indoor environment that often concentrate in dust. We discuss the diversity of PFAS in settled dust, emission sources of these chemicals, changes in PFAS profiles in dust over the past century, and the implications for human health. RECENT FINDINGS: Sources of PFAS found in dust include building materials and furnishings and consumer products used in typical indoor spaces. Daycares and workplaces are emphasized as locations with widespread exposure due to the presence of treated carpeting and industrial-strength cleaners. Comparison and interpretation of findings across studies are complicated by the different ways in which PFAS are screened across studies. We further discuss recent developments in non-targeted software for the comprehensive annotation of PFAS in indoor dust and emphasize the need for comprehensive and harmonized analytical workflows. We highlight the detection and diversity of PFAS in settled dust collected from various indoor spaces, including locations with vulnerable subpopulations. There are opportunities for future research to leverage settled dust as a sentinel environmental matrix to evaluate the link between inhalation and ingestion routes of PFAS exposure to adverse health.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a family of more than 7,000 fluorinated compounds. The carbon-fluorine bond of PFAS provides desirable hydrophobic and oleophobic properties and stability that has led to widespread usage in consumer products and industrial applications. The strength of the carbon-fluorine bond also prevents appreciable degradation once released into the environment. Consequently, various household products can release volatile and nonvolatile PFAS into the indoor environment that often concentrate in dust. We discuss the diversity of PFAS in settled dust, emission sources of these chemicals, changes in PFAS profiles in dust over the past century, and the implications for human health. RECENT FINDINGS: Sources of PFAS found in dust include building materials and furnishings and consumer products used in typical indoor spaces. Daycares and workplaces are emphasized as locations with widespread exposure due to the presence of treated carpeting and industrial-strength cleaners. Comparison and interpretation of findings across studies are complicated by the different ways in which PFAS are screened across studies. We further discuss recent developments in non-targeted software for the comprehensive annotation of PFAS in indoor dust and emphasize the need for comprehensive and harmonized analytical workflows. We highlight the detection and diversity of PFAS in settled dust collected from various indoor spaces, including locations with vulnerable subpopulations. There are opportunities for future research to leverage settled dust as a sentinel environmental matrix to evaluate the link between inhalation and ingestion routes of PFAS exposure to adverse health.
Authors: Vilma Sukiene; Andreas C Gerecke; Yu-Mi Park; Markus Zennegg; Martine I Bakker; Christiaan J E Delmaar; Konrad Hungerbühler; Natalie von Goetz Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Somrutai Poothong; Eleni Papadopoulou; Juan Antonio Padilla-Sánchez; Cathrine Thomsen; Line Småstuen Haug Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Elsie M Sunderland; Xindi C Hu; Clifton Dassuncao; Andrea K Tokranov; Charlotte C Wagner; Joseph G Allen Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Timothy L Coggan; Damien Moodie; Adam Kolobaric; Drew Szabo; Jeff Shimeta; Nicholas D Crosbie; Elliot Lee; Milena Fernandes; Bradley O Clarke Journal: Heliyon Date: 2019-08-23