Literature DB >> 3498558

Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts.

R I Rubinstein1, A D Askenase, D Thickman, M S Feldman, J B Agarwal, R H Helfant.   

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating graft patency after coronary bypass surgery, 20 patients who had prior surgery (average 5.5 years, range 1.5 to 14) and recent cardiac catheterization because of chest pain were studied. No patient had surgical intervention or change in symptoms in the time interval between catheterization and MR imaging. These 20 patients had a total of 47 grafts, defined as proximal anastomoses: 20 to the left anterior descending or diagonal artery (LAD), 13 to the left circumflex artery marginal branches (LCX), and 14 to the right coronary artery or posterior descending artery (RCA). The patients underwent cardiac and respiratory gated MR scans in a 0.5 tesla magnet with an echo time of 22 msec and two repetitions in a 128 X 256 matrix. In-plane resolution was 2.7 mm. Every patient had a scan in the transaxial plane and some underwent scanning in the sagittal and coronal planes as well. A graft was considered patent by MR when a signal-free lumen was visualized in an anatomic position consistent with that of a bypass graft, had a lumen larger than the native vessels, was seen on more than one slice, and was seen at a level higher than that of the native vessels. If a known graft was not seen it was considered occluded. The scans were interpreted by consensus of two physicians aware of the operative but not the cardiac catheterization data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3498558     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.76.4.786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

1.  Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Th Wittlinger; T Voigtländer; K F Kreitner; P Kalden; M Thelen; J Meyer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts: clinical reality?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; S E Langerak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging.

Authors:  C B Paschal; E M Haacke; L P Adler; D A Finelli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  R M MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

5.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Maria Luigia Storto; Nicola Maddestra; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Nuclear magnetic resonance in clinical pharmacology and measurement of therapeutic response.

Authors:  W H Aellig
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  A practical approach to MRI of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow.

Authors:  A C van Rossum; M A Galjee; J C Post; C A Visser
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

8.  MRI in the detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts: are invasive techniques still needed?

Authors:  S E Langerak; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrogeni; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Genovefa Kolovou
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-26

Review 10.  The role of magnetic resonance in the evaluation of functional results after CABG/PTCA.

Authors:  A C van Rossum; M A Galjee; T Doesburg; M Hofman; J Valk
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.