| Literature DB >> 34985508 |
Yiming Ye1, Yunzhi Xu1, Yangfan Yang1, Yanmei Fan1, Pingping Liu1, Keming Yu1, Minbin Yu1.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the corneal epithelial thickness (CET) of the 9-mm diameter zone in patients treated using topical antiglaucoma medications and to evaluate the factors associated with CET changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34985508 PMCID: PMC8742533 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.1.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Demographics, OSD Data, and Treatment of Eyes with Antiglaucoma Therapy and Controls
| Parameter | Patients ( | Controls ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 46.88 ± 16.61 (23–82) | 45.94 ± 15.74 (21–83) | 0.732 |
| Sex, F:M | 44:31 | 37:28 | 0.865 |
| OSDI | 9.47 ± 10.20 (0–45.40) | 6.04 ± 6.97 (0–24.97) | 0.024 |
| TBUT, s | 6.37 ± 2.34 (2–10) | 7.88 ± 2.52 (3–13) | 0.001 |
| Schirmer I test, mm | 10.45 ± 4.93 (2–21) | 12.49 ± 5.40 (4–24) | 0.021 |
| Corneal staining, grade | 0.75 ± 0.82 (0–3) | 0.26 ± 0.52 (0–2) | <0.001 |
| 0: No epitheliopathy, % ( | 44.00 (33) | 73.85 (48) | 0.001 |
| MD, dB | −4.73 ± 3.87 (−19.04 to −0.05) | ||
| Duration of treatment, mo | 22.2 ± 10.5 (3.6–42) | ||
| No. of topical glaucoma medications | 1.61 ± 0.74 (1–4) | ||
| No. of drops applied | 1205.9 ± 988.8 (108–3960) |
Independent t-test.
Chi-square test.
Mann-Whitney U test.
MD, mean deviation; OSDI, ocular surface disease index; TBUT, tear film breakup time.
Corneal Epithelial Thickness (µm) in Different Analyzed Zones
| Central | Paracentral | Mid-Peripheral | Peripheral | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Average | S-I | T-N | ST-IT | SN-IN | Average | S-I | T-N | ST-IT | SN-IN | Average | S-I | T-N | ST-IT | SN-IN | |
| Controls | 53.15 ± 3.65 | 52.55 ± 3.29 | −2.09 ± 2.80 | −0.78 ± 1.73 | −1.03 ± 2.18 | −1.47 ± 2.44 | 51.67 ± 3.22 | −3.37 ± 3.06 | −1.31 ± 2.40 | −1.69 ± 2.73 | −1.54 ± 2.85 | 50.31 ± 3.61 | −4.87 ± 4.37 | −2.02 ± 2.73 | −3.02 ± 3.89 | −1.68 ± 4.29 |
| Patients | 50.56 ± 3.26 | 49.66 ± 3.27 | −2.18 ± 2.58 | −0.67 ± 2.04 | −0.91 ± 2.45 | −1.24 ± 2.24 | 48.98 ± 3.28 | −3.52 ± 2.98 | −0.85 ± 1.91 | −1.48 ± 2.91 | −1.36 ± 3.02 | 48.20 ± 2.95 | −5.81 ± 4.94 | −1.53 ± 3.34 | −3.63 ± 4.00 | −2.47 ± 4.03 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.847 | 0.748 | 0.766 | 0.575 | <0.001 | 0.768 | 0.208 | 0.658 | 0.721 | <0.001 | 0.240 | 0.349 | 0.363 | 0.265 |
S, superior; I, inferior; T, temporal; N, nasal; S-T, superior temporal; I-T, inferior temporal; S-N, superior nasal; I-N, inferior nasal.
Figure.Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness (mean values ± SDs) between eyes with topical antiglaucoma therapy and controls in all 25 sections. Color coding represents the ET change compare with the controls.
The OSD Data and Corneal Epithelial Thickness of Eyes with Different Antiglaucoma Medications
| Total | PGAs (1) | Combination With PGAs (2) | Non-PGA Medications (3) | Combination Without PGAs | Beta Blockers | Alpha-2 Agonists | CAI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye, | 75 | 29 | 32 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |
| Age, y | 46.88 ± 16.61 | 45.17 ± 14.8 | 48.28 ± 17.6 | 47.21 ± 18.6 | 47.83 ± 20.0 | 44.67 ± 17.4 | 74.00 | 32 | 0.768 |
| OSDI | 9.47 ± 10.20 | 8.61 ± 10.27 | 9.65 ± 11.11 | 10.86 ± 8.17 | 11.73 ± 7.65 | 10.97 ± 10.29 | 11.35 | 4.54 | 0.382 |
| Fluorescein staining, grade | 0.75 ± 0.82 | 0.55 ± 0.74 | 1.00 ± 0.92 | 0.57 ± 0.65 | 0.67 ± 0.82 | 0.50 ± 0.548 | 1.00 | 0 | 0.088 |
| Schirmer I test, mm | 10.45 ± 4.93 | 10.90 ± 4.94 | 11.00 ± 5.05 | 8.29 ± 4.32 | 9.00 ± 4.73 | 6.50 ± 2.35 | 6.00 | 17.00 | 0.180 |
| TBUT, s | 6.37 ± 2.34 | 6.55 ± 2.32 | 6.28 ± 2.35 | 6.19 ± 2.50 | 6.33 ± 2.50 | 6.83 ± 2.64 | 4.65 | 3 | 0.808 |
| Duration of treatment, mo | 22.2 ± 10.5 | 21.10 ± 11.5 | 22.88 ± 10.7 | 23.06 ± 12.1 | 34.2 ± 4.2 | 14.0 ± 9.8 | 19.2 | 14.4 | 0.792 |
| Central, µm | 50.56 ± 3.26 | 51.71 ± 2.99 | 48.50 ± 2.61 | 52.89 ± 2.38 | 51.83 ± 2.18 | 53.42 ± 2.48 | 55.00 | 56.00 | <0.001 |
| Paracentral, µm | 49.66 ± 3.27 | 50.99 ± 2.64 | 47.35 ± 2.73 | 52.16 ± 2.15 | 51.24 ± 2.01 | 52.64 ± 2.15 | 51.63 | 55.31 | <0.001 |
| Mid-peripheral, µm | 48.98 ± 3.28 | 49.92 ± 2.60 | 47.17 ± 3.22 | 51.17 ± 2.61 | 50.65 ± 2.08 | 52.18 ± 1.84 | 45.08 | 54.13 | <0.001 |
| Peripheral, µm | 48.20 ± 2.95 | 48.45 ± 2.59 | 47.25 ± 3.36 | 49.85 ± 1.67 | 49.42 ± 2.06 | 50.64 ± 1.46 | 45.85 | 50.31 | 0.017 |
One-way ANOVA.
Kruskal-Wallis test.
OSDI, ocular surface disease index; TBUT, tear film breakup time; PGA, prostaglandin analog; CAI, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor.
The OSD Data and Corneal Epithelial Thickness of Eyes with Different Treatment Duration
| ≤1 y ( | 1–2 y ( | ≥2 y ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 43.44 ± 14.42 | 47.40 ± 17.82 | 48.12 ± 16.89 | 0.643 |
| OSDI | 6.67 ± 10.47 | 9.81 ± 9.35 | 10.55 ± 10.70 | 0.237 |
| Fluorescein staining, grade | 0.69 ± 0.95 | 0.68 ± 0.75 | 0.82 ± 0.83 | 0.683 |
| Schirmer I test, mm | 9.19 ± 4.07 | 11.56 ± 5.72 | 10.24 ± 4.62 | 0.480 |
| TBUT, s | 6.69 ± 2.47 | 6.95 ± 2.42 | 5.79 ± 2.14 | 0.149 |
| Central, µm | 52.25 ± 3.71 | 50.76 ± 3.22 | 49.61 ± 2.77 | 0.024 |
| Paracentral, µm | 51.29 ± 3.45 | 49.73 ± 3.45 | 48.84 ± 2.84 | 0.046 |
| Mid-peripheral, µm | 50.55 ± 2.75 | 48.87 ± 3.88 | 48.32 ± 2.86 | 0.080 |
| Peripheral, µm | 49.89 ± 2.18 | 47.99 ± 3.40 | 47.56 ± 2.66 | 0.028 |
One-way ANOVA.
Kruskal-Wallis test.
OSDI, ocular surface disease index; TBUT, tear film breakup time.
The Correlation Between the Influencing Factors and Corneal Epithelial Thickness of Different Sections
| Average | Central | Paracentral | Midperipheral | Peripheral | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age, y | −0.435 | <0.001 | −0.100 | 0.392 | −0.328 | 0.004 | −0.510 | <0.001 | −0.429 | <0.001 |
| Fluorescein staining, grade | −0.207 | 0.074 | −0.234 | 0.044 | −0.261 | 0.024 | −0.204 | 0.080 | −0.106 | 0.367 |
| No. of medications | −0.274 | 0.017 | −0.341 | 0.003 | −0.395 | <0.001 | −0.262 | 0.023 | −0.086 | 0.461 |
| Duration of treatment, mo | −0.264 | 0.022 | −0.303 | 0.008 | −0.249 | 0.032 | −0.223 | 0.054 | −0.276 | 0.017 |
| No. of drops applied | −0.240 | 0.038 | −0.251 | 0.030 | −0.276 | 0.016 | −0.239 | 0.039 | −0.156 | 0.183 |
Influencing Factors on Corneal Epithelial Thickness (µm) of Different Annular Analyzed Zones by Multiple Linear Regression Analysis
| Average ET | Central | Paracentral | Mid-peripheral | Peripheral | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confounding Factor | β |
| β |
| β |
| β |
| β |
|
| Age, y | −0.077 | <0.001 | – | – | −0.062 | 0.003 | −0.099 | <0.001 | −0.071 | <0.001 |
| Duration of treatment, mo | – | – | −0.075 | 0.020 | – | – | – | – | −0.060 | 0.031 |
| No. of medications | −1.060 | 0.012 | −1.339 | 0.007 | −1.722 | <0.001 | −1.104 | 0.013 | – | – |
ET, epithelial thickness.