Literature DB >> 34985324

Preliminary Steps Toward Extracting the Specific Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Diagnoses From Criteria A and B Self-Reports.

Dominick Gamache1,2,3, Philippe Leclerc1, Maude Payant4, Kristel Mayrand5, Marie-Chloé Nolin1, Louis-Alexandre Marcoux6, Stéphane Sabourin7,8, Marc Tremblay9, Claudia Savard2,3,10.   

Abstract

The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) retains six specific personality disorders (PDs) that can be diagnosed based on Criterion A level of impairment and Criterion B maladaptive facets. Those specific diagnoses are still underresearched, despite the preference expressed by most PD scholars for a mixed/hybrid classification. This study explores the possibility of using Criterion A and B self-report questionnaires to extract the specific AMPD diagnoses. Plausible prevalence estimates were found in three samples (outpatient PD, private practice, community; N = 766) using the facet score ≥ 2 and t score > 65 methods for determining the presence of a Criterion B facet; diagnoses had meaningful correlations with external variables. This study provides evidence-albeit preliminary-that the extraction of the specific AMPD PDs from self-report questionnaires might be a viable avenue. Ultimately, it could promote the use and dissemination of those diagnoses for screening purposes in clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative Model for Personality Disorders; DSM-5; level of impairment; maladaptive personality traits; personality disorder; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34985324     DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2012_35_541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Disord        ISSN: 0885-579X


  1 in total

1.  Editorial: The AMPD in Clinical and Applied Practice: Emerging Trends and Empirical Support.

Authors:  Mark H Waugh; Abby L Mulay; Gina Rossi; Kevin B Meehan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.