Eve M Valera1, Julia C Daugherty, Olivia C Scott, Howard Berenbaum. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Valera); Mind, Brain Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain (Dr Daugherty); Harvard College, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Ms Scott); and Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Dr Berenbaum).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to examine the relationship between strangulation-related alterations in consciousness (AIC) and cognitive and psychological outcomes in women who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). SETTING: Participants were recruited from a variety of settings, including women's shelters and support programs. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 99 women were enrolled in the study. After applying exclusion criteria for factors that could mask or confound the effects of strangulation, 52 women remained for analyses. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective. MAIN MEASURES: We used several cognitive measures to assess learning, long-term and working memory, visuomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, and nonverbal cognitive fluency as well as several psychological measures to assess posttraumatic stress symptomatology, general distress, worry, anhedonic depression, and anxious arousal. We also used the Brain Injury Severity Assessment interview to examine the association between strangulation-related AICs and these measures of cognitive and psychological functioning. RESULTS: Women who had experienced strangulation-related AICs performed more poorly on a test of long-term memory (P < .03) and had higher levels of depression (P < .03) and posttraumatic stress symptomatology (P < .02) than women who had not experienced strangulation-related AIC. When controlling for potential confounding variables, including number of IPV-related traumatic brain injuries, women who had experienced strangulation also performed more poorly on a measure of working memory. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to assess strangulation in this manner and demonstrate links to cognitive and psychological functioning. These preliminary data contribute to our knowledge of strangulation and its effects on women who have experienced IPV.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to examine the relationship between strangulation-related alterations in consciousness (AIC) and cognitive and psychological outcomes in women who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). SETTING: Participants were recruited from a variety of settings, including women's shelters and support programs. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 99 women were enrolled in the study. After applying exclusion criteria for factors that could mask or confound the effects of strangulation, 52 women remained for analyses. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective. MAIN MEASURES: We used several cognitive measures to assess learning, long-term and working memory, visuomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, and nonverbal cognitive fluency as well as several psychological measures to assess posttraumatic stress symptomatology, general distress, worry, anhedonic depression, and anxious arousal. We also used the Brain Injury Severity Assessment interview to examine the association between strangulation-related AICs and these measures of cognitive and psychological functioning. RESULTS: Women who had experienced strangulation-related AICs performed more poorly on a test of long-term memory (P < .03) and had higher levels of depression (P < .03) and posttraumatic stress symptomatology (P < .02) than women who had not experienced strangulation-related AIC. When controlling for potential confounding variables, including number of IPV-related traumatic brain injuries, women who had experienced strangulation also performed more poorly on a measure of working memory. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to assess strangulation in this manner and demonstrate links to cognitive and psychological functioning. These preliminary data contribute to our knowledge of strangulation and its effects on women who have experienced IPV.
Authors: Jacquelyn C Campbell; Daniel Webster; Jane Koziol-McLain; Carolyn Block; Doris Campbell; Mary Ann Curry; Faye Gary; Nancy Glass; Judith McFarlane; Carolyn Sachs; Phyllis Sharps; Yvonne Ulrich; Susan A Wilt; Jennifer Manganello; Xiao Xu; Janet Schollenberger; Victoria Frye; Kathryn Laughon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: D P Bernstein; L Fink; L Handelsman; J Foote; M Lovejoy; K Wenzel; E Sapareto; J Ruggiero Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: John D Corrigan; Martha Wolfe; W Jerry Mysiw; Rebecca D Jackson; Jennifer A Bogner Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 8.661