| Literature DB >> 34984406 |
Meucci M1,2, Costedoat C3, Verna E3, Adam F3, Signoli M3, Drancourt M1,2, Beye M2, Aboudharam G1,4, Barbieri R1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dental pulp, encapsulating a blood drop, could be used to diagnose pathogen bacteraemia in archaeological materials using DNA-based techniques. We questioned the viability of such ancient pathogens preserved in ancient dental pulp.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium tertium; Culturomics; Dental pulp; Paleomicrobiology; Soldier; WWI
Year: 2021 PMID: 34984406 PMCID: PMC8693014 DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Microb Sci ISSN: 2666-5174
Fig. 1Workflow summarizing culture of ancient dental pulps: Step 1: Teeth 45 and 34 were disinfected with pure ethanol and bleach. After the teeth were fractured, the dental pulp was extirpated under anaerobiosis; Step 1a: Sediment from the non-disinfected teeth of individual SQ517 and surrounding the tibia were used; Step 2: Dental pulp was mixed with 10uL of PBS; Step 2a: Sediment from the outer teeth and tibia were respectively mixed with 10μl and 150μl of PBS; Step 3: The rehydrated pulp was placed onto an agar plate with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany); Step 3a: Rehydrated sediments were placed onto an agar plate with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany); Step 4: Agar plates were incubated at 37° under a 5% CO2 atmosphere in a microaerophilic bag and were inspected daily.
Fig. 2Osteological traumas on individual SQ517; A (I), (II) and (III): Marks on the left tibia resulting from a cold steel weapon; B: Bullet exit hole on the ilium of the left hip bone; C: Bullet entry hole on the ilium of the left hip bone; D and E: Perimortem fracture to the right zygomatic branch of the skull and to the mandibular condyle.
Fig. 3C. tertium colonies yield from SQ517 individual after three days of incubation.
Fig. 4Gram staining from Q5690 C. tertium strain under 100x optical microscopic lenses.
Bacteria founded in negative control cultures: Bacterial species isolated from the sediment samples around SQ517, from the anaerobic hood and from the culture media inoculated with PBS.
| Species | Score Value 1 (MALDI-TOF) | Score Value 2 (MALDI-TOF) |
|---|---|---|
| Clostridium sordellii | 2.28 | 2.31 |
| Clostridium sporogène | 2.00 | 2.22 |
| Clostridium novyi | 2.00 | 1.92 |
| Bacillus megaterium | 2.15 | 2.24 |
| Bacillus cereus | 2.28 | 2.39 |
| Bacillus simplex | 2.00 | 1.76 |
| Bacillus licheniformis | 2.42 | 2.30 |
| Bacillus pumilus | 2.15 | 2.24 |
| Paenibacillus glucanolyticus | 2.13 | 2.21 |
| Clostridium tetani | 2.14 | 2.13 |
| Bacillus toyonensis | 2.19 | 2.09 |
| Staphylococcus homini | 2.19 | 2.19 |
Fig. 5Antibiogram: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) 30 mg/L, erythromycin (E) 15 mg/L, metronidazole (MET) 4 mg/L and clindamycin (DA) 2 mg/L on Q5690. - Scan 1200®.
Pairwise genomic comparison of strain Q5690 with other species using the GGDC software, formula 2 (dDDH estimates based on identities over HSP length). The confidence intervals indicate the inherent uncertainty in estimating dDDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets.
| Q5690 | Clostridium tertium | Clostridium chauvoei | Clostridium isatidis | Clostridium sartagoforme | Clostridium septicum | Clostridium jeddahitimonense | Clostridium saudiense | Clostridium celatum | Clostridium disporicum | Clostridium gasigenes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q5690 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Clostridium tertium | 89.4 | 100% | |||||||||
| [87 - 92] | |||||||||||
| Clostridium chauvoei | 21.7 | 21.7 | 100% | ||||||||
| [19.4–24] | [19.4–24] | ||||||||||
| Clostridium isatidis | 21.6 | 21.7 | 21 | 100% | |||||||
| [19.4–24] | [19.4–24] | [18.8–23] | |||||||||
| Clostridium sartagoforme | 23.8 | 23.6 | 21.6 | 21 | 100% | ||||||
| [21.5–26] | [21.3–26] | [19.4–24] | [18.8–24] | ||||||||
| Clostridium | 21.9 | 21.8 | 28.8 | 21.1 | 21.9 | 100% | |||||
| septicum | [19–24] | [19.6–24] | [26.4–31] | [18.9–24] | [19.6–24] | ||||||
| Clostridium jeddahitimonense | 20.5 | 20.7 | 20.3 | 21.1 | 21.2 | 21.3 | 100% | ||||
| [18.2–23] | [18.4–23] | [18.1–23] | [18.9–24] | [19–24] | [19–24] | ||||||
| Clostridium saudiense | 20.4 | 20.4 | 20.7 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 21.2 | 21.8 | 100% | |||
| [18.2–23] | [18.2–23] | [18.4–23] | [18.1–23] | [18.5–23] | [19–24] | [19.5–24] | |||||
| Clostridium celatum | 20. | 21.2 | 20.6 | 21.2 | 20.7 | 21 | 21.8 | 19.5 | 100% | ||
| [18.2–23] | [18.9–24] | [18.4–23] | [19–24] | [18.5–23] | [18.7–23] | [19.5–24] | [17.3–22] | ||||
| Clostridium disporicum | 20 | 20.3 | 20.3 | 20.1 | 20.4 | 20.7 | 33.2 | 22.2 | 21.9 | 100% | |
| [17.8–22] | [18.1–23] | [18.1–23] | [17.9–23] | [18.2–23] | [18.5–23] | [30.7–36] | [19.9–25] | [19.7–24] | |||
| Clostridium gasigenes | 19.9 | 20.7 | 21.7 | 21.6 | 21.2 | 21.6 | 21 | 20.7 | 20.7 | 20.6 | 100% |
| [17.7–22] | [18.5–23] | [19.5–24] | [19.3–24] | [19–24] | [19.3–24] | [18.7–23] | [18.4–23] | [18.4–23] | [18.4–23] |
Fig. 6Phylogenic tree of 20 Clostridium species: The tree underlines the proximity between 22 genomes from different Clostridium species. Q5690 appears closer to the reference genome MGYG-HGUT-01,328 than from Q6181 (modern diagnostic strain). The closest relative to C. tertium is Clostridium sartagoforme. All genomes can be found on NCBI.
Fig. 7Phylogenic tree including all C. tertium genomes available on NCBI database: The tree underlines the proximity between several genomes from different C. tertium strain. Q5690 appears closer to the reference strain from 1923 (SP2622) than from the reference genome MGYG-HGUT-01,328. The closest relative to C. tertium Q5690 is strain BSD2780120874_150,323_E10. All genomes can be found on NCBI.
Fig. 8FISH on SQ517 dental pulp: 1: filter AF555; 2: filter AF640; 3: Filter AF488; 4: DAPI; 5: MERCH.