Literature DB >> 34984109

Evaluation of a Novel Left Ventricular Assist Device for Resuscitation in an Animal Model of Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest.

Zongtao Wang1, Huiming Yu2, Shiping Yan3, Hong Yan2, Danhong Chen2, Yining Dai2, Qichun Xu2, Zhihuan Zeng1, Wei Zhang1, Lijun Jin2.   

Abstract

We evaluated an independently developed novel percutaneous implantable left ventricular assist device for resuscitation in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. The model was established in 10 domestic pigs by blocking the anterior descending coronary artery with a balloon after anesthesia. With ventilator-assisted ventilation, the independently developed percutaneous implantable left ventricular assist device was inserted via the femoral artery to assist circulation. According to whether effective circulatory support was achieved, the pigs were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group was subjected to insertion of the assist device and received continuous circulatory support. The control group underwent insertion of the assist device; however, it did not start it within 15 minutes. For all animals, if successful rescue was achieved (sinus rhythm restoration within 15 minutes and maintenance for over 5 minutes), circulatory support was stopped, and the arterial blockage was removed. If sinus rhythm was not restored within 15 minutes, electric defibrillation, adrenaline injection, and removal of the arterial blockage were performed, and circulatory support was provided until sinus rhythm recovered. A determination of failed rescue was made when sinus rhythm was not restored after 1 hour. All successfully rescued animals were fed for 1 week. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the groups. All animals underwent successful novel left ventricular assist device implantation through the femoral artery. The rescue rate was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (80% vs. 0%, [Formula: see text]). All successfully rescued animals survived after 1 week of feeding, and no eating or movement abnormalities were observed. We conclude that this independently developed percutaneous implantable left ventricular assist device can be conveniently and rapidly implanted through the femoral artery and can maintain basic circulatory perfusion during resuscitation in an animal model of cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Percutaneous implantation; cardiac arrest; left ventricular assist device; rescue

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34984109      PMCID: PMC8719647          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3135445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  17 in total

1.  The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Biswajit Kar; Igor D Gregoric; Sukhdeep S Basra; Gary M Idelchik; Pranav Loyalka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Mechanical circulatory support following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldsweig; Hyo Jung Tak; M Chadi Alraies; James Park; Craig Smith; John Baker; Lang Lin; Nainesh Patel; William W O'Neill; Mir B Basir
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2020-12-22

Review 3.  2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Monica M Colvin; Mark H Drazner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Steven M Hollenberg; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; Pamela N Peterson; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Cheryl Westlake
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.712

4.  A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

Authors:  William W O'Neill; Neal S Kleiman; Jeffrey Moses; Jose P S Henriques; Simon Dixon; Joseph Massaro; Igor Palacios; Brijeshwar Maini; Suresh Mulukutla; Vladimír Dzavík; Jeffrey Popma; Pamela S Douglas; Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  James C Fang; Gregory A Ewald; Larry A Allen; Javed Butler; Cheryl A Westlake Canary; Monica Colvin-Adams; Michael G Dickinson; Phillip Levy; Wendy Gattis Stough; Nancy K Sweitzer; John R Teerlink; David J Whellan; Nancy M Albert; Rajan Krishnamani; Michael W Rich; Mary N Walsh; Mark R Bonnell; Peter E Carson; Michael C Chan; Daniel L Dries; Adrian F Hernandez; Ray E Hershberger; Stuart D Katz; Stephanie Moore; Jo E Rodgers; Joseph G Rogers; Amanda R Vest; Michael M Givertz
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Saket Girotra; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John A Spertus; Yan Li; Harlan M Krumholz; Paul S Chan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Blood trauma testing of CentriMag and RotaFlow centrifugal flow devices: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael A Sobieski; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Mickey Ising; Steven C Koenig; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.094

8.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge.

Authors:  Davor Barić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.