Literature DB >> 34984025

Variations in TAP1 and PSMB9 Genes Involved in Antigen Processing and Presentation Increase the Risk of Vitiligo in the Saudi Community.

Ahmad H Mufti1, Imad A AlJahdali2, Nasser A Elhawary1, Samar N Ekram1, Iman Abumansour1, Ikhlas A Sindi3, Hind Naffadi4, Ezzeldin N Elhawary5, Najiah M Alyamani6, Ghydda Alghamdi1, Wafaa Alosaimi7, Ghufran Rawas8, Amaal Alharbi9, Mohammed T Tayeb1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The antigen processing 1 (TAP1) and proteasome 20S subunit beta 9 (PSMB9) genes are associated with strong susceptibility to many autoimmune diseases. Here, we explored whether TAP1/PSMB9 genetic variants, individually or combined, affected susceptibility to the complex, autoimmune-based skin disorder vitiligo.
METHODS: Samples of genomic DNA from buccal cells of 172 patients with vitiligo and 129 healthy controls were analyzed using TaqMan™ genotyping assays for the TAP1 rs1135216 (A>G) and PSMB9 rs17587 (A>G) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPStats software (https://www.snpstats.net) was utilized to choose the best interactive inheritance mode for selected SNPs.
RESULTS: The genotype frequencies for the TAP1 rs1135216 and PSMB9 rs17587 SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for cases (P= 0.11 and P= 0.10, respectively) but not for controls (P< 0.05). The TAP1 rs1135216 (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 (R60H) SNPs increased the risk of vitiligo four-fold and two-fold, respectively (odds ratio [OR]= 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-6.5; P< 0.0001 and OR= 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.1; P< 0.0001). The recessive model (G/G-D/G versus D/D) and the codominant model (R/R versus R/H) were the best models of inheritance for the rs113526 and rs17587 SNPs, respectively (OR= 16.4; 95% CI, 2.0-138; P= 0.0006 and OR= 1.7; 95% CI, 0.3-1.8; P= 0.013). Vulgaris, focal vulgaris, and acryl/acrofacial were the most common vitiligo subtypes in our sample (51%, 21%, and 19%, respectively). Heterozygous rs113526 (637D/G) and rs17587 (60R/H) were the most common genotypes in most vitiligo subtypes. The heterozygous 637D/G genotype and the 637G variant allele were significantly more common in patients with active disease than in patients with stable disease (P= 0.000052 and P= 0.0063, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a crucial role for TAP1 rs1135216 and PSMB9 rs17587 in the risk and progression of vitiligo in the Saudi community. Genomic analyses are needed to identify more candidate genes and more genetic variants associated with vitiligo.
© 2021 Mufti et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAP1/PSMB9; TaqMan genotyping; linkage disequilibrium; single nucleotide polymorphisms; vitiligo

Year:  2021        PMID: 34984025      PMCID: PMC8702990          DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S341079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gen Med        ISSN: 1178-7074


Plain Language Summary

Vitiligo is characterized by skin depigmentation due to a lack of melanocytes, which are cells that produce melanin deep inside the skin’s outer layer (ie, the epidermis). Initial patchy loss of skin color occurs on the hands, forearms, faces, and areas around body openings and genitalia. Sometimes hair on the scalp, eyelashes, and eyebrows prematurely gray. Most patients develop symptoms between 10 and 30 years of age, but the first lesions are typically observed at approximately 20 years. Multiple genes involved in the pathogenesis of vitiligo have been identified in different cultures and among people of different ethnicities. Small differences in these genes and how they interact could play a considerable role in complex disorders such as vitiligo. In the current study, the authors studied two genes that are associated with autoimmune disorders to see if small differences in the genes affected risk for vitiligo in the Saudi community.

Introduction

Vitiligo, a rare polygenic skin disorder with a non-Mendelian pattern of inheritance, is characterized by depigmented circumscribed macules or lesions supported in the underlying epidermal layers of the skin.1 Initial patchy loss of skin color targets hands, forearms, faces, and the areas around body openings and genitalia. Sometimes premature graying of hair also occurs on the scalp, eyelashes, and eyebrows. Most patients develop symptoms between 10 and 30 years of age,2 but the first lesions are typically observed at approximately 20 years.3 In-depth surveys have estimated the population prevalence of vitiligo to be 0.5–2.28% in both adults and children worldwide.1,3–9 Some studies have found high rates as high as 5–9% in diverse ethnic populations.10−12 In Saudi Arabia, vitiligo affects about 2.5% of the Saudi population and represents between 5% and 7% of skin disorders seen in the hospital setting.13–15 The prevalence of vitiligo among female school children in the Eastern Saudi province has been identified as 0.4%.16 Oxidative stress, autoimmunity, and neurochemistry have been hypothesized to explain the pathophysiology behind the development of vitiligo.17–20 Thirty percent of vitiligo cases have been strongly categorized as concomitant autoimmune disorders.17,19 Several comorbidities, including autoimmune thyroid disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes, Sjögren’s syndrome, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, celiac disease, and Addison’s disease have also been reported in association with vitiligo.21–28 Selection of candidate genes is always challenging, especially in polygenic and immune-associated disorders in which exposure to environmental risk factors and gene-gene interactions are involved. VitiVar, a compendium of genes and variants associated with vitiligo (), included 322 candidate genes and 254 genetic variations reported in 202 research articles as of late 2021. Genes involved in antigen processing and presentation, such as transporter associated with antigen processing 1 (TAP1) and proteasome 20S subunit beta 9 (PSMB9), have been shown to play potential roles in several autoimmune diseases, including vitiligo,29–36 and are included in VitiVar. The membrane-associated protein encoded by the TAP1 gene (MIM #170260) is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. The TAP1 protein assembles with the TAP2 protein, forming a TAP complex. This protein dimer transports degraded cytosolic peptides from foreign invaders into the endoplasmic reticulum, where the peptides are attached to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I proteins. The peptide-bound MHC class I proteins are then moved to the cell’s surface so that T-cells can interact with them and launch an immune response.37 PSMB9 (MIM #177045) is a multicatalytic complex protein that degrades damaged or unneeded proteins by breaking peptide bonds. Zaiss et al38 have reported that immunoproteasome subunits protect against the development of CD8+ T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases. The TAP1 and PSMB9 genes are linked to macromolecular catabolic processes associated with proteasomes responsible for degrading short-lived cytoplasmic proteins into peptides.39,40 Because TAP1 and PSMB9 genes may thus restrict antigen processing and presentation, they are attractive candidate genes for increasing susceptibility to vitiligo. Although much genetic information is available on vitiligo, most reports are from Caucasian and South Asian populations. Only a small number of research articles and reviews have discussed the role of genetics in vitiligo among Saudi populations.41–51 Although Tayeb51 reported that TAP1 (C>T intron 7) and PSMB8 (G>T intron 6) were not significantly associated with vitiligo in the Saudi community, more in-depth studies are needed at these loci to explore possible associations. Hence, the present study investigated associations between vitiligo and the TAP1 rs1135216 A/G (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 A/G (R60H) variant alleles and evaluated the influence of various genotypes on the risk and severity of disease.

Patients and Methods

Study Population

The study population included 172 individuals diagnosed with vitiligo referred from dermatology divisions in governmental hospitals in Saudi Western governorates (eg, Jeddah, Mecca, Al-Hada, and Taif). The clinical diagnosis of vitiligo was based on characteristic skin depigmentation with typical localization as detected under a Wood’s lamp and confirmed by dermatologists. Patients had no other associated autoimmune diseases. The demographic and clinical characteristics collected included gender, age of examination, clinical history of both patients and their relatives, consanguineous status, history of other autoimmune disorders, previous treatment, and types of vitiligo lesions. Vitiligo lesions were classified as follows:1,31 focal (one or more maculae in a non-segmented pattern), vulgaris (a symmetric or asymmetric distribution of maculae in one or more areas), segmental (unilateral depigmented macules that do not cross the midlines), acral/acrofacial (depigmentation on tips of fingers and toes, on anogenital areas, on lips, and around the eyes), and universalis (complete or >80% skin depigmentation). These vitiligo subtypes were classified as active (ie, progressive) or stable. Participants with congenital non-progressive depigmentation or depigmentation due to melanotoxic chemicals; lupus erythematosus; or postinfectious, postinflammatory, or post-traumatic localized depigmentation were excluded from the study. Those exposed to any therapy in the past six months were also excluded. A group of healthy controls (n = 129) with no clinical evidence of vitiligo, no family history of the disease, and no other autoimmune disorders were also included in the study (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Participant eligibility and applied methodology.

Participant eligibility and applied methodology. Molecular analyses were performed at the DNA Diagnostic Laboratories, Medical Genetics Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University. This study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Biomedical Ethics Committee-Umm Al-Qura University (#HAPO-02-K-012), based on the National Committee of Medical and Bioethics (King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology-Riyadh), approved the study. All individuals in this study gave their written informed consent before participating in the study.

TaqMan Genotyping Analysis

Genomic DNA samples were isolated from buccal cells by gently scraping the mucosa using an Oragene.DNA-OGR-575 kit (DNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada) following some modifications.52 We implemented TaqMan real-time PCR (Thermo, Applied Biosystems, USA) to genotype individuals for the TAP1 rs1135216ʹ D637G’ (C____531909_20) and PSMB9 rs17587 “R60H” (C___8849004_1_) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using a 7500 Fast-Dx Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) with the transcript accessions and protein IDs NM_000593.5 (NP_000584.2) and NM_002800.4 (NP_002791.1) on GRCH38. The probe sequences were 5`-CCC TGA CAG CTG GCT CCC AGC CTC G[C/T]C TAC CTC TGC AGA GCA AAG GGC CAA-3` for TAP1 rs1135216 and 5`-GAC AAG CTG TCC CCG CTG CAC GAG C[A/G]C ATC TAC TGT GCA CTC TCT GGT TCA-3` for PSMB9 rs17587. We used VIC/FAM dyes as the reporter/quencher probes. For the sake of genotyping accuracy, all DNA samples and negative controls were included in the assays. The genotypes of all samples were reassessed in duplicate. To confirm our results, some suspected PCR products were purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP kit (Beckman Coulter, Canada) and genotyped with the Genetic Analyzer 3500 (Thermo Fisher Inc., USA).

Bioinformatics Analysis

For the nonsynonymous TAP1 rs1135216 (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 (R60H) variants, we used the in silico tools Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT), Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (PolyPhen2), MutationTaster, Functional Analysis through Hidden Markov Models (FATHMM), Mutation Assessor, and loss-of-function tool (LoFtool) to predict the effects of the SNPs on their corresponding functional proteins (Ensemble Variant Effect Predictor; ).

TAP1-PSMB9 Protein Interaction

The Search Tool for Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) database53 () was also used to predict functional interactions between proteins.

Statistical Analysis

Consistency with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was evaluated at the TAP1 rs1135216 A/G and PSMB9 rs17587 A/G loci by comparing the observed and expected genotypes in cases and controls using chi-squared (χ2) analysis. A P-value < 0.05 was considered a departure from HWE. We considered interactive models of inheritance— codominant, dominant, recessive, overdominant, and additive—using SNPstats software (). A low Akaike information criterion (AIC) value corresponding to minimum expected entropy was adopted to assess the best inheritance model. Logistic regression of genotype distributions was adjusted by age. Bonferroni correction was performed for multiple tests in genotype analyses of the examined SNPs. The statistical significance of linkage disequilibrium between the polymorphic markers was calculated based on the coefficient of linkage disequilibrium (D`) and the correlation coefficient between pairs of loci (r). Logistic regressions for genotypic distributions of cases and controls were measured in odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The paired t-test and one-way ANOVA in chi-square (χ2) values were applied to evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics of cases using MedCalc () and Social Science Statistics () software. We used G*Power software () to estimate the required sample sizes of cases and controls to get a power 80% using the priori/post hoc tests in terms of z-test, and 0.05 of α error probability.

Results

Clinico-Epidemiologic Profile of the Population

Among the 172 cases of vitiligo, the female-to-male ratio was 1:1. No significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between cases and controls regarding age or gender. Among vitiligo cases, the mean age at onset was 11.5 years (range, 2–47 years) and mean age at examination was 22 years (range, 4–50 years). When examined by age intervals, the mean age of onset was 8.3 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.7) in children aged 2–10 years, 18.0 years (SD, 5.76) in adolescents aged 11–20 years, and 10.1 years (SD, 3.56) in adults aged > 21 years or older (Figure 2A). Twenty-four (16.3%) of the 172 cases were consanguineous (Figure 2B). In terms of phenotype, more cases of vitiligo were active (ie, progressive) (66.7%; P < 0.0001) than stable (33.3%; P < 0.0001). The patches of depigmentation were sensitive to the sun in 50% of cases (z = 27.1; P < 0.0001). A low percentage of individuals with vitiligo also had diabetes mellitus type 1 (5.8%; z = 0.5, P = 0.63) or hypothyroidism (16.3%; z = 6.8, P < 0.0001).
Figure 2

Clinico-epidemiologic profile of vitiligo cases. (A) Frequencies of age at onset and age at examination by age interval. (B) Frequencies of demographic and clinical characteristics.

Clinico-epidemiologic profile of vitiligo cases. (A) Frequencies of age at onset and age at examination by age interval. (B) Frequencies of demographic and clinical characteristics.

HWE and Power Analysis

The observed genotype frequencies were consistent with HWE at the rs1135216 and rs17587 genetic loci in cases (χ2 = 2.61; P = 0.11 and χ2 = 2.8; P = 0.10, respectively) but deviated from HWE at rs1135216 (P < 0.05) and rs17587 (P = 0.05) in controls. The statistical priori power analysis found that a power of 80.6% would require 33 cases and 26 controls for the TAP1 rs1135216 SNP, and that a power of 80.0% would require 151 cases and 116 controls for the PSMB9 rs17587 SNP. The post hoc statistical analysis for the TAP1 rs1135216 and rs17587 SNPs revealed actual powers of 99.9% and 84.5%, respectively, among our 301 participants (172 cases and 129 controls).

Allele Frequencies of TAP1 and PSMB9 Loci

Table 1 shows the allele frequencies of the TAP1 rs1135216 and PSMB9 rs17587 polymorphic loci. The TAP1 637G and PSMB9 60H variant alleles were significantly more frequent in cases than controls (73% versus 37% and 39.5% versus 23.3%, respectively). The two SNPs were also associated with four-fold and two-fold increased risks for vitiligo, respectively; the ORs of the allelic variants were 4.6 (95% CI, 3.2–6.5; z = 8.6; P < 0.0001) for TAP1 rs1135216 (D637G) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5–3.1; z = 4.2; P < 0.0001) for PSMB9 rs17587 (R60H).
Table 1

Allele Frequencies and Genotype Distributions of TAP1 rs1135216 A>G (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 G>A (R60H) Polymorphic Loci in Vitiligo

Genetic ModelInteractive GenotypeVitiligo Cases n = 172Controls n = 129Logistic Regression (Adjusted by Gender)
OR (95% CI)P valueAIC
TAP1 rs1135216 A>G (D637G):
CodominantD/D4 (2.3)33 (25.6)1
D/G84 (48.8)95 (73.6)NA (0.00-NA)< 0.000187.8
G/G84 (48.8)1 (0.7)NA (0.00-NA)
DominantG/G84 (48.8)1 (0.7)1<0.000191.0
D/G-D/D88 (51.2)128 (99.2)NA (0.00-NA)
RecessiveG/G-D/GD/D168 (97.7)96 (74.4)10.0006115.5
4 (2.3)33 (25.6)16.4 (2.0–138.0)
OverdominantG/G-D/D88 (51.2)34 (26.4)10.012120.9
D/G84 (48.8)95 (73.6)3.2 (1.3–8.2)
log-additive37.1 (5.0–277.2)<0.000188.8
Allele:D92 (0.27) 252161 (0.62)1 (reference)
G(0.73)97 (0.38)4.6 (3.2–6.5)8.6 (< 0.0001)
PSMB9 rs17587 A>G (R60H):
CodominantR/R68 (39.5)72 (55.8)1
R/H68 (39.5)54 (41.9)1.7 (0.3–1.8)0.013118.5
H/H36 (20.9)3 (2.3)0.1 (0.01–0.6)
DominantR/R68 (39.5)72 (55.8)1
R/H-H/H104 (60.5)57 (44.2)0.5 (0.2–1.2)0.12122.8
RecessiveR/R-R/H140 (81.4)126 (97.7)1
H/H32 (18.6)3 (2.3)0.1 (0.01–0.7)0.004117.0
OverdominantR/R-H/H100 (58.1)75 (60.5)1
R/H72 (41.9)54 (39.5)1.1 (0.5–2.5)0.82125.2
log-additive0.6 (0.2–1.2)0.014119.2
Allele:RH208 (0.61)198 (0.77)1 (reference)
136 (0.40)60 (0.23)2.2 (1.5–3.1)4.2 (< 0.0001)

Notes: Bold numbers, statistically significant associations (P < 0.05).

Abbreviations: NA, not available; TAP1, transport associated with antigen processing; PSMB9, proteasome subunit beta type-9 (known as 20S proteasome subunit beta-1i); AIC, The Akaike information criterion value; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Allele Frequencies and Genotype Distributions of TAP1 rs1135216 A>G (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 G>A (R60H) Polymorphic Loci in Vitiligo Notes: Bold numbers, statistically significant associations (P < 0.05). Abbreviations: NA, not available; TAP1, transport associated with antigen processing; PSMB9, proteasome subunit beta type-9 (known as 20S proteasome subunit beta-1i); AIC, The Akaike information criterion value; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Genotypic Distributions of TAP1 and PSMB9 Loci

Using the SNPStats software (), the recessive model (G/G-D/G versus D/D) and the codominant model (R/R versus R/H) were the best models of inheritance (OR = 16.4; 95% CI, 2.0–138; P = 0.0006 for rs113526 and OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 0.3–1.8; P = 0.013 for PSMB9 rs17587) based on AIC minimum values (Table 1). The 637D/D wild genotype was more common in controls than cases (25.6% versus 2.3%). Also, no controls carried the 637G/G genotype.

Effect of Examined Loci on the Phenotypes of Vitiligo

Vitiligo vulgaris (VV) was the most frequent vitiligo subtype (51%) in our case group, followed by focal vitiligo (FV) (21%) and acral/acrofacial vitiligo (AV) (19%) (Figure 3). Segmented vitiligo (SV) and universalis vitiligo (UV) were the least common (2% and 7%, respectively). Figure 4 presents the frequencies of specific TAP1 (D637G) and PSMB9 (R60H) genotypes in vitiligo patients with different clinical subtypes. Within PSMB9 rs17587 A/G, the heterozygous 60R/H genotype was the most frequent among the subtypes: 59% (VV), 38% (UV), 56% (FV), 50% (AV), and 50% (SV). Within TAP1 rs1135216 A/G, the heterozygous 637D/G genotype was the most frequent: 54% (VV), 67% (UV), 59% (AV), and 75% (SV). The most frequent genotype in any one of the subtype groups was 637G/G within TAP1 rs1135216 A/G, present in more than three-quarters of cases with the FV subtype.
Figure 3

Frequencies of vitiligo phenotypes in cases.

Figure 4

Distribution of TAP1 (D637G) and PSMB9 (R60H) genotypes among patients with different vitiligo phenotypes.

Frequencies of vitiligo phenotypes in cases. Distribution of TAP1 (D637G) and PSMB9 (R60H) genotypes among patients with different vitiligo phenotypes.

Association of Genetic Loci with Vitiligo Progression

Table 2 highlights the frequencies of the TAP1 (D637G) and PSMB9 (R60H) genotypes in patients with active versus stable phenotypes. The heterozygous 637D/G genotype was significantly more common in patients with active disease than those with stable disease (64% versus 29%; χ2 = 19.7; P = 0.000052). Hence, the 637G variant allele was also more predominant in cases with active disease than those with stable disease (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2 3.4; z = 2.7; P = 0.0063). No statistically significant differences were found in the genotype distributions and allele frequencies of the PSMB9 R60H locus in active versus stable phenotypes (χ2 = 0.969 P = 0.616 and OR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7–1.6; z = 0.17; P = 0.86).
Table 2

Genotype Distributions and Allelic Frequencies of the Examined TAP1/PSMB9 Genetic Loci for Active versus Stable Vitiligo Phenotypes

PhenotypeCases (%)TAP1 (D637G)Genotypes,a n (%)Alleles n (Frequency)PSMB9 (R60H) Genotypes, n (%)Alleles n (Frequency)
DDDGGGDGRRRHHHRH
Active104 (60.5)1 (0.96)66 (63.5)37 (35.6)68 (0.33)140 (0.67)18(17.3)66 (63.5)20 (19.2)102 (0.49)106 (0.51)
Stable68 (39.5)3 (4.41)20 (29.4)45 (66.2)26 (0.19)110 (0.81)10(14.7)48 (70.6)10 (14.7)68 (0.50)68 (0.50)
Logistic Regression:χ2= 19.7, P = 0.000052bOR= 2.1, 95% CI (1.2–3.4), z= 2.7, P= 0.0063cΧ2= 0.969, P= 0.6161bOR= 1.0, 95% CI (0.7–1.6), z= 0.17, P= 0.86b

Notes: Numbers of subjects, with percentages in parentheses. aTAP1 A/G (D637G) genotype differences between active and stable vitiligo cases; bP > 0.05, no significant difference; cP < 0.05 = a significant difference.

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Genotype Distributions and Allelic Frequencies of the Examined TAP1/PSMB9 Genetic Loci for Active versus Stable Vitiligo Phenotypes Notes: Numbers of subjects, with percentages in parentheses. aTAP1 A/G (D637G) genotype differences between active and stable vitiligo cases; bP > 0.05, no significant difference; cP < 0.05 = a significant difference. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Haplotype Association and Linkage Disequilibrium

Among the four possible haplotypes of the TAP1 rs1135216 (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 (R60H) loci, the 637D-60H haplotype had an overall frequency of 8.81% (OR = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.00–1.33; P = 0.0004) (Table 3). The global haplotype analysis also showed that this haplotype was significantly more common than the other haplotypes when adjusted by age (P < 0.0001). In addition, there was strong linkage disequilibrium between the TAP1 rs1135216 A/G (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 A/G (R60H) loci (D` = 0.3959; r = ‒0.2476; P = 0.0012).
Table 3

Haplotype Association Analysis of the TAP1 rs1135216 D637G and PSMB9 rs17587 R60H SNPs (Adjusted by Age)

HaplotypeTAP1 637D>GPSMB9 60R>HFrequencyOR (95% CI)P value
1DR0.36011 (reference)
2GR0.31430.01 (0.00–0.19)0.003
3GH0.2380.01 (0.00–0.13)0.0004
4DH0.08810.05 (0.00–1.33)0.078
Global haplotype association P-value: < 0.0001

Notes: Bold numbers, statistically significant associations (P < 0.05).

Haplotype Association Analysis of the TAP1 rs1135216 D637G and PSMB9 rs17587 R60H SNPs (Adjusted by Age) Notes: Bold numbers, statistically significant associations (P < 0.05).

Bioinformatics and Functional Data

Table 4 shows the predicted functional consequences of the TAP1 rs1135216 (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 (R60H) loci (). The missense TAP1 rs1135216 SNP (c.1978A/G; p.D637G) was found to have damaging effects on the functional protein according to FATHMM (score, −2.37) and LoFtool (score, 0.0865), though it was found to have neutral effects according to Mutation Assessor (score, 1.275) and MutationTaster (score, 1.36×10−36). All the examined tools predicted the missense PSMB9 rs17587 SNP (c.217G/C; p.R60H) to have benign and tolerant effects.
Table 4

In silico Functional Predictions of Non-Synonymous SNPs

SNP IDAllele Freq.BiotypeProtein PositioncDNA PositionCDS PositionCodonSIFT (Score)PolyPhen2 (Score)Mutation-TasterFATHMMMutationAssessorLoFtool
rs1135216A/G (0.19)Protein-codingD637G19781910GAC/GGC1.0 (tolerant)0 (benign)1.36e-36(polymorphism)−2.37 (damage)1.275(neutral)0.0865(probable damage)
rs17587G/A(0.46)Protein-codingR60H217179CGC/ CAC0.2 (tolerant)0.003(benign)0.999 (polymorphism)2.11(tolerant)1.05(low)0.2244(tolerant)

Abbreviations: CDS, coding sequence; FATHMM, functional analysis through hidden Markov models; LoFTool, loss-of-function tool (); SIFT, sorting intolerant from tolerant; PolyPhen-2, polymorphism phenotyping-2.

In silico Functional Predictions of Non-Synonymous SNPs Abbreviations: CDS, coding sequence; FATHMM, functional analysis through hidden Markov models; LoFTool, loss-of-function tool (); SIFT, sorting intolerant from tolerant; PolyPhen-2, polymorphism phenotyping-2.

Protein–Protein Interaction Network Analysis

Figure 5 presents the protein-network interaction of the TAP1-PSMB9 protein predicted with STRING software. The TAP1-PSMB9 protein network showed significantly more interactions (P-value = 0.000538) than would be expected for a random set of proteins of the same size and degree of distribution drawn from the genome.
Figure 5

Gene-network interactions contained the TAP1 and PSMB9 genes examined in this study (right side) created with STRING (), in which there are strong interactions between the TAP1/TAP2 genes and PSMB9 gene. On the Left side: More extended genes contained PSMB and PSMA gene families are shown. The TAP1 gene co-occurred the PSMB10 gene, while the PSMB9 gene considerably interacted and co-expressed with neighboring PSMB and PSMA gene families. Each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Colored nodes describe proteins and the first shell of interactors. Edges represent protein–protein associations that are meant to be specific and meaningful, ie, proteins jointly contribute to a shared function; this does not necessarily mean they are physically binding each other.

Gene-network interactions contained the TAP1 and PSMB9 genes examined in this study (right side) created with STRING (), in which there are strong interactions between the TAP1/TAP2 genes and PSMB9 gene. On the Left side: More extended genes contained PSMB and PSMA gene families are shown. The TAP1 gene co-occurred the PSMB10 gene, while the PSMB9 gene considerably interacted and co-expressed with neighboring PSMB and PSMA gene families. Each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Colored nodes describe proteins and the first shell of interactors. Edges represent protein–protein associations that are meant to be specific and meaningful, ie, proteins jointly contribute to a shared function; this does not necessarily mean they are physically binding each other.

Discussion

This case-control study explored common SNPs in the TAP1 rs1135216 A>G (D637G) and PSMB9 rs17587 A>G (R60H) loci as candidate polymorphic biomarkers for vitiligo. Overall, our results showed that the rs1135216 and rs17587 SNPs were associated with four-fold and two-fold increased risks of vitiligo, respectively. In the study, the genotypic distributions were significantly different under recessive and codominant models for the rs1135216 and rs17587 SNPs, respectively. In Caucasians, Casp et al31 previously reported a significant association between vitiligo and TAP1 rs1135216 (P = 0.0034) but not between vitiligo and PSMB9 rs17587 (P = 0.11). In contrast, a study of 378 cases of vitiligo and 509 healthy controls in an Indian population found no association between TAP1 rs1135216 and either generalized or active vitiligo (P > 0.05 each), but did find associations between PSMB8 rs2071464 and both vitiligo phenotypes (P = 0.019 and P = 0.005, respectively).54 In a more recent study, Dani et al55 found a strongly significant role for the PSMB9 rs17587 polymorphic locus in 1050 generalized and 270 localized cases of vitiligo in Northern Indians. Our results showed an overrepresentation of VV in the study population (51.2%). This pattern is similar to that reported in most ethnic populations, in which the prevalence of the VV subtype ranges from 50–60%.56–60 It has been reported that VV and other forms of nonsegmental vitiligo (eg, acrofacial, mucosal, generalized, universal) can develop at any age, but it most often occurs in young people between the ages of 10 and 30 years.61–63 In our study, the presence of VV was strongly associated with variant alleles of the rs1135216 and rs17587 SNPs we studied. There were no significant associations between the progression of vitiligo (ie, activity, stability) and the D637G or R60H polymorphic marker (P = 0.83 and P = 0.75, respectively). The 637G variant allele was dominant in cases with progression (P = 0.0063), while the 60H variant allele was not dominant in cases with active patches (P > 0.05). An earlier study described an association between vitiligo and insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM’), but not between vitiligo and non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).64,65 Among our sample group, the prevalence of cases with T1DM (10/172 cases; 5.8%) was higher than that reported in Caucasians,17 Turkish individuals,66 and Jordanians.67 The higher frequency of co-occurring vitiligo and T1DM in our study might be due to a higher incidence of T1DM in Saudi Arabia or to the interaction of multiple genes affecting both vitiligo and diabetes. In some instances, individuals with vitiligo develop other autoimmune conditions, particularly those affecting the thyroid.68 The frequency of autoimmune thyroid disease in patients with vitiligo has been estimated to be 14%, and the risk of developing this type of disease has been reported to be 2.5-fold higher for vitiligo patients than for individuals without vitiligo.68 The prevalence of thyroid pathology in our cases (16.3%, P < 0.0001) was slightly higher than that reported in Turkish (4.4%)66 or Chinese (6.8%)69 vitiligo patients. In a Caucasian population, 5.7% of first-degree relatives of individuals with vitiligo were reported as having clinical autoimmune thyroid disease, which was more than twice the population frequency (P < 0.001).17 Several autoimmune disorders, including cutaneous disorders such as vitiligo and halo nevi, have been reported to affect female and male individuals at similar rates.70 No gender differences were seen among vitiligo cases in our study, as vitiligo affected both sexes equally. The equity of vitiligo in male and female individuals could be rationalized in some ethnic, regional populations such as Indians and Northern Chinese.3 Girls and women often seek clinical counseling more frequently and experience more social bullying than boys and men.56 In contrast, among 3280 individuals with vitiligo in a US population, women represented 57.6% of the cases, compared with men representing 42.4%.25 Consanguinity is present in approximately 10% of the global population.71 In the Saudi community, nearly 54% of all marriages are consanguineous (between cousins).72,73 The actual degree of inbreeding is further complicated by the high frequency of marriages occurring within a tribe or caste. Our results showed a 16.3% prevalence of consanguineous relationships (24 of 172 cases) associated with a 39.5% (68/172 cases) positive family history of vitiligo. Another study from the Northern region of Saudi Arabia (Arar city) recorded high rates of consanguinity among vitiligo patients (65%, 45/69 cases).48 Despite the relatively low prevalence of vitiligo in Saudi Arabia, estimated at 0.4–2.5%,13,16,74 the disease is linked to psychosocial burden, as 45–57% of vitiligo patients experience depression.46,75,76 Although age of onset is variable, most patients develop symptoms between 10 and 30 years of age.2 The mean age of onset in our study—11.5 years (range, 2–47 years)—is consistent with a previous report by Alzolibani.77 However, most populations have reported a later onset, with a mean of at least 21 years.17,31,66,67 The age of onset in our Saudi sample group was higher than that reported in American (White and Hispanic/Latino),25 and Northern Indian60 populations. In 47 unrelated Egyptian individuals with vitiligo, ages 2–18 years, our research team also reported an earlier mean age of onset (5.9 years).78 In addition, in a recent cohort study including 220 Egyptian children, El-Husseiny et al79 reported a mean age of onset of 6.18 years (childhood group, < 12 years).

Study Limitations

Our study had several limitations. First, patchy lesions are more obvious in darker-skinned individuals, so age of onset is somewhat lower in these ethnic populations than in our study. Also, the inconsistent prevalence reported in the literature may be due to higher reporting in regions where social and cultural stigma is common.61 Second, our study was limited to only two polymorphic biomarkers whose association with vitiligo risk has been debated in the literature. However, conflicting molecular data regarding candidate genes and some rare variants associated with this autoimmune disease are not uncommon. Because reported inclusion/exclusion criteria have been broad in studies among different ethnic populations, replication of the results of many of these studies would be challenging. Genome-wide linkage analyses in multiplex families have identified several linkage signals for the TAP and PSMB genes as candidate genes.35,80–83 Therefore, we have launched an exome sequencing analysis to identify more candidate genes and rare variants to help us better understand this complex disease.

Conclusion

The associations of the TAP1 rs1135216 D637G and PSMB9 rs17587 R60H polymorphisms with vitiligo support evidence of the defective antigen processing, which potentially influence the immune cells targeting melanocytes. Heterozygosity in TAP1 (637D/G) genotype and the minor allele 637G have increased risk with progressive (active) phenotype than those with stable one in Saudi vitiligo cases. However, further studies need to confirm these functional outcomes. Identifying these new vitiligo susceptibility genes in the Saudi population has opened new avenues for exploring the underlying disease mechanisms for vitiligo. More linkage studies based on a whole-exome approach, rather than a single-gene approach or a focus on a few candidate genes, would be useful for discovering additional genes and variants associated with susceptibility to vitiligo.
  77 in total

Review 1.  Vitiligo: a comprehensive overview Part I. Introduction, epidemiology, quality of life, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, associations, histopathology, etiology, and work-up.

Authors:  Ali Alikhan; Lesley M Felsten; Meaghan Daly; Vesna Petronic-Rosic
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Vitiligo: Epidemiology and clinical pattern at King Khalid University Hospital.

Authors:  J S Jarallah; O A Al-Sheikh; M El-Shabrawy; M A Al-Wakeel
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.526

3.  Autoimmune destruction of skin melanocytes by perilesional T cells from vitiligo patients.

Authors:  Jasper G van den Boorn; Debby Konijnenberg; Trees A M Dellemijn; J P Wietze van der Veen; Jan D Bos; Cornelis J M Melief; Florry A Vyth-Dreese; Rosalie M Luiten
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  The influence of TAP1 and TAP2 gene polymorphisms on TAP function and its inhibition by viral immune evasion proteins.

Authors:  P Praest; R D Luteijn; I G J Brak-Boer; J Lanfermeijer; H Hoelen; L Ijgosse; A I Costa; R D Gorham; R J Lebbink; E J H J Wiertz
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.407

5.  Vitiligo in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  I M Gould; R S Gray; S J Urbaniak; R A Elton; L J Duncan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Comorbidities associated with vitiligo: a ten-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Vaneeta M Sheth; Ye Guo; Abrar A Qureshi
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.366

Review 7.  Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases.

Authors:  A H Bittles; M L Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Vitiligo blood transcriptomics provides new insights into disease mechanisms and identifies potential novel therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Rama Dey-Rao; Animesh A Sinha
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  A case-control study on association of proteasome subunit beta 8 (PSMB8) and transporter associated with antigen processing 1 (TAP1) polymorphisms and their transcript levels in vitiligo from Gujarat.

Authors:  Shahnawaz D Jadeja; Mohmmad Shoab Mansuri; Mala Singh; Mitesh Dwivedi; Naresh C Laddha; Rasheedunnisa Begum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Growth arrest specific gene 6 protein concentration in cerebrospinal fluid correlates with relapse severity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P P Sainaghi; L Collimedaglia; F Alciato; R Molinari; D Sola; E Ranza; P Naldi; F Monaco; M Leone; M Pirisi; G C Avanzi
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.711

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Genetic etiology and clinical challenges of phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Nasser A Elhawary; Imad A AlJahdali; Iman S Abumansour; Ezzeldin N Elhawary; Nagwa Gaboon; Mohammed Dandini; Abdulelah Madkhali; Wafaa Alosaimi; Abdulmajeed Alzahrani; Fawzia Aljohani; Ehab M Melibary; Osama A Kensara
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.481

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.