| Literature DB >> 34983365 |
Chengren Gou1, Tong Liu1,2, Zidong Zhou1, Zongping Chen3, Tao Song1,4, Kaiyi Mao1, Congcong Chen1, Bo Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ischiocavernosus muscle (ICM) encompasses a pair of short pinnate muscles attached to the pelvic ring. The ICM begins at the ischial tuberosity and ends at the crus of the penis while covering the surface of the crus. According to the traditional view, the contraction of the ICM plays an auxiliary role in penile erection. However, we have previously shown that the ICM plays an important role in penile erection through an indirect method of diagnosing erectile dysfunction (ED) caused by ICM injury by observing the infertility of paired female rats. Since intracavernosal pressure (ICP) is the current gold standard for diagnosing ED, this study aimed to amputate unilaterally/bilaterally the ICM to establish an ED model by detecting the ICP, recording the infertility of matching female rats, and comparing the two methods.Entities:
Keywords: Erectile dysfunction; Intracavernosal pressure; Ischiocavernosus muscle amputation; Male rats; Pregnancy rate
Year: 2022 PMID: 34983365 PMCID: PMC8729152 DOI: 10.1186/s12610-021-00151-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Clin Androl ISSN: 2051-4190
Fig. 1Exposure of the ischiocavernosus muscle and cavernous nerve during the surgery and the induction of penile erection by electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve in male rats. A:1. the root of the penis and 2. ischiocavernosus muscle; B:1. penis and 2. ischiocavernosus muscle; C:1. seminal vesicle gland, 2. rectum, 3. bladder, 4. prostate gland, and 5. vas deferens; D:1. hypogastric nerve, 2. pelvic nerve, 3. pelvic ganglia, and 4. cavernous nerve; E:1. bladder, 2. seminal vesicle gland, 3. vas deferens, 4. hypogastric nerve, 5. pelvic ganglia, and 6. cavernous nerve; F:1. a nonerect penis of a male rat; G:1. an erect penis of a male rat after electrical stimulation
Comparison of the intracavernosal pressure changes induced by electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerves in rats measured immediately after surgery
| Group | Control group | Sham operation group ( | Uni-ICM amputation group ( | Bi-ICM amputation group ( | 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline ICP (M±SD, mmHg) | 17.44±2.50 | 17.81±2.81 | 16.73±2.11 | 14.78±2.78 | 2.833 | 0.052 |
| Max ICP (M±SD, mmHg) | 93.51±10.78 | 95.07±10.40 | 83.49±12.38 | 33.57±6.72* | 79.691 | |
| -21.74 | -22.67 | -16.81 | -8.17 | |||
| 2 |
Uni-ICM unilateral ischiocavernosus muscle, Bi-ICM bilateral ischiocavernosus muscle, ICP intracavernosal pressure, M±SD mean±standard deviation
1P values were calculated using one-way analysis of variance; the Bonferroni t test was used for multiple comparisons
2P values were calculated using covariance analysis of max ICP, adjusted for the baseline ICP
* indicates that the max ICP of the Bi-ICM amputation group was significantly lower than those of the control group, sham operation group, and Uni-ICM amputation group (all P<0.05)
Significant at P<0.05
Comparison of the intracavernosal pressure changes induced by electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerves in rats 2 months postoperatively
| Group | Control group (n = 9) | Sham operation group ( | Uni-ICM amputation group ( | Bi-ICM amputation group ( | 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline ICP (M±SD, mmHg) | 16.82±3.07 | 18.44±2.80 | 15.72±4.27 | 17.98±2.93 | 1.233 | 0.314 |
| Max ICP (M±SD, mmHg) | 90.91±8.04 | 91.40±10.33 | 89.06±9.87 | 59.12±5.88* | 26.22 | |
| -25.83 | -20.46 | -21.57 | -17.71 | |||
| 2 |
Uni-ICM unilateral ischiocavernosus muscle, Bi-ICM bilateral ischiocavernosus muscle, ICP intracavernosal pressure, M±SD mean±standard deviation
1P values were calculated using one-way analysis of variance; the Bonferroni t test was used for multiple comparisons
2P values were calculated using covariance analysis of the max ICP, adjusted for the baseline ICP
* indicates that the Max ICP of the Bi-ICM amputation group was lower than those of the control group, sham operation group, and Uni-ICM amputation group, but the difference was statistically insignificant (all P<0.05)
Significant at P<0.05
Comparison of the cohabiting conception rate and time to conception for paired rats in the control group, sham group, UNI-ICM group and BI-ICM group
| Group | Number of successful matches | Number of pregnancies obtained | Number of failed pregnancies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 9 | 9 | 0 | 21±2 | 100* | 111.09/89.53 | |
| Sham operation group | 9 | 9 | 0 | 23±3 | 100 | ||
| Uni-ICM amputation group | 10 | 9 | 1 | 29±6Φ | 90# | ||
| Bi-ICM amputation group | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0Δ |
Uni-ICM unilateral ischiocavernosus muscle, Bi-ICM bilateral ischiocavernosus muscle, ICP intracavernosal pressure, M±SD mean±standard deviation
1one-way analysis of variance; the Bonferroni t test was used for multiple comparisons
Φ indicates a statistically significant difference in the time to conception in the Uni-ICM amputation group compared to the control group and sham operation group (P<0.05)
* indicates there was no statistically insignificant difference in the pregnancy rate between the control group, sham operation group and the Uni-ICM amputation group (all P>0.05)
2Chi2 test, and the Fisher’s exact method calculates the probability directly
# indicates a statistical significance difference in the pregnancy rate between the Uni-ICM amputation and Bi-ICM amputation groups (P<0.05)
Significant at P<0.05
Δ indicates a statistically significant difference in the pregnancy rate in the Bi-ICM amputation group compared to those in the Uni-ICM amputation group, control group, and sham operation group (P<0.05)