Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and the perception of body weight by parents or friends.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the State of Kuwait has witnessed a steady rise in the prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents. The present study aims to provide an update on the rate of overweight or obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and examines the associations between adolescents' overweight/obesity levels and their perception of body weight as seen by parents or friends.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Kuwaiti secondary schools and included adolescents between the ages of 15 and 18 years, using a multistage stratified random sampling method. Body weight and height were measured. A specifically designed self-report questionnaire was used to assess parents' and friends' perceptions of an adolescent's body weight.
RESULTS: A total of 706 adolescents were included the study. The prevalence of overweight or obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents reached nearly 50%, with males (54.3%) having a significantly higher overweight or obesity percentage than females (44.6%). No significant difference in the prevalence of obesity relative to age, from 15 to 18 years, was found. In addition, logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender, revealed that adolescents perceived their parents (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001) or friends (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) as more likely to classify their weight as overweight or obese, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Overweight or obesity levels appear to be high among Kuwaiti adolescents, and appears to have reached a plateau recently. Efforts to combat obesity and promote physical activity and healthy nutrition are needed. Future studies should seek to identify important moderators of parental and social underestimation/overestimation of children's overweight or obesity.

Introduction

Over the past 30 years, the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents worldwide has increased rapidly [1]. It is estimated that about 18% of children and adolescents aged 5–19 were overweight or obese in 2016 [1]. In the State of Kuwait, the prevalence of overweight or obesity was shown to be higher than what was reported elsewhere in the world. For example, a study conducted by Al-Haifi et al. revealed that the prevalence of overweight and obesity was 50.5% in boys and 46.5% in girls [2]. A more recent study indicated that more than half of Kuwaiti adolescents (59.8% of boys, and 49.2% of girls) were overweight or obese [3]. These figures were much higher than the prevalence rate of overweight or obesity reported for boys (30.0%) and girls (31.8%) in 2004 [4]. It is well recognized that obesity in adolescence is associated with numerous immediate and long-term adverse health conditions [5], and that obesity is very likely to persist into adulthood [6]. Adult obesity and associated comorbidities, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, currently represent the main costs acquired by health care organizations [7].

Adolescence is a distinct developmental and transition period into adulthood, with increasingly expanding autonomy [8]. Throughout this developmental period, parents and the family continue to have an important and central influence on adolescents’ health and lifestyle. However, a study involving American adolescents aged 14–18, with a body mass index (BMI) greater than the 85th percentile for their age and sex, indicated that parents overestimated how supportive they were compared to adolescents’ perception [9]. Further, as the social learning theory suggests, the adolescents’ decision to embark on a particular behavior depends on the exposure to norms, values and behavioral attitudes of other people with whom they interact [10]. The period from childhood to adolescence is also a time when peers potentially exert a stronger influence on behavior, including the effect on obesity risk behavior [11]. An Australian study examined how friendship network characteristics can be associated with obesity-related behaviors in students aged 11–13. The regression model showed that friendship networks varied by gender and behavior type, including the number of friends positively associated with physical activity intensity (in males) and screen time (in females) [12]. Thus, increased physical activity in different contexts may come from the selection of active male friends, and for girls, having more friends is associated with increased screen time [12].

Compared with peers with normal weight, a greater percentage of adolescents with severe obesity reported lower self-esteem and body satisfaction, parental encouragement to diet, and peer weight teasing [13]. These factors may diminish their quality of life and may predict increased weight gain over time [13]. Moreover, overweight and obese adolescents are more likely to be teased about their weight than average-weight individuals [14-16]. Weight-related teasing is particularly associated with clinical eating disorders, unhealthy weight control behaviors, and negative weight-related attitudes such as body dissatisfaction [17]. Although family members and friends play a role in adolescent body satisfaction and weight control behaviors, they have also been determined to be the two main sources of weight teasing [14, 18–21]. Understanding the associations between an adolescent’s overweight or obesity and their perception about how parents or friend see their actual weight status is extremely important because lifestyle behavior intervention programs benefit from parental and social support. Therefore, the present study reports on the prevalence of overweight or obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and examines its relationship with their perception of body weight as seen by parents or friends.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Kuwaiti secondary schools during the fall of 2019. Recruited adolescents were between the ages of 15 and 18 years. A predetermined sample size of 368 participants for each sex group was calculated, so that the population proportion was assumed to be at 0.60 with a tolerated error of 0.05. A multistage stratified random sampling method was used to select the participants from the schools. The stratification was based on gender (male versus female schools), type of school (public versus private), and geographical or administrative location (governorates) in the State of Kuwait. Two schools (one for boys and one for girls) from each governorate were selected, along with two private schools (sub-total: 14 schools). Then, one classroom from each grade (i.e., 10th, 11th, and 12th) was randomly chosen in each selected school. Inclusion criteria included healthy students not suffering from diet-related disorders (using questions inserted in the questionnaire). Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the College of Health Sciences in Kuwait. In addition, the Ministry of Education in Kuwait approved the study. Written informed ascents were obtained from all participating students and written consents were attained from their parents if they were younger than 18 year-olds. The research procedures were conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Anthropometric measurement

Bodyweight was measured to the nearest 100 gm (Seca 875 Weight Scale, Germany) and height to the nearest 0.1 cm (Seca 213 Standiometer, Germany) by trained researchers assisted by students. All measurements were conducted with minimal clothing and without shoes. BMI was computed as the ratio of weight in kilograms divided by the squared height in meters. The extended International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) age- and sex-specific BMI cutoff reference standards were used to classify underweight, normal weight, and overweight or obesity relative to the adolescent’s age [22]. For the analysis, the adolescents were categorized according to BMI classifications: non-overweight/non-obesity versus overweight/obesity. In addition, students were asked to report their age where puberty had occurred to them.

Description of questionnaire

A specifically designed and previously tested self-report questionnaire was used for this study [23]. The questionnaire consisted of three sections: 1) frequency of media use (e.g., magazines, TV, and internet); 2) influence of media on dieting to lose weight; and 3) perception of body weight by parents or friends. The question in the first section was “How often do you read magazines per week, watch TV per day, and use the internet per day?” The second section aimed to measure the associations between media and dieting with questions such as “Does reading magazines, watching TV, and using the internet influence your diet to lose weight?” The responses included the following choices: high influence, moderate influence, weak influence, or no influence. The third section measured the perception of one’s body weight by one’s parents or friends through questions such as “How do your parents or friends perceive the adolescent’s body weight as underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese?” Also, participants were asked whether any of their parents or friends teased them because of their weight. The responses included the following choices: always, sometimes, rarely, or no. In the present study, we used the data from part three only, which was related to adolescent’s body weight perception as seen by parents or friends.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into an SPSS data file, checked, cleaned, and analyzed using IBM-SPSS program, version 22 (Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were obtained for all variables and reported as means and standard deviations or percentages. Differences between males and females in anthropometric measurements were tested using a t-test for independent samples. Chi-square test of independence was used to examine the relationships of selected variables related to adolescents’ perception of how parents’ or friends’ see their weight status relative to an adolescent’s overweight or obesity versus non-overweight/non-obesity status. Two-way ANOVA (gender by age category) was used to test differences in BMI across age and gender. In addition, multivariable analyses (MANCOVA) were used to test differences in selected variables stratified by gender and obesity status while controlling for age. Finally, logistic regression analyses with adjusted odds ratio were used to test the differences in selected variables relative to non-overweight or non-obesity versus overweight or obesity, while adjusting for age and gender. The alpha level was set at 0.05, and any value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Table 1 describes the anthropometric characteristics of the participants relative to gender. A total sample of 343 boys and 363 girls was obtained for the study. There were significant differences between males and females in body weight (p < 0.001), height (p < 0.001), and BMI (p = 0.029). Only 7% of the adolescents were underweight, whereas 25.4% were obese. Moreover, there was a significant (p = 0.001) difference in overweight and obesity status relative to gender. The prevalence of overweight or obesity among male adolescents (54.3%) was significantly (p = 0.010) higher than among females (44.6%). However, there was no significant (p = 0.731) difference in the prevalence of obesity relative to age from 15 to 18 years old (not shown in the table); the proportions of overweight plus obesity were 53.3%, 47.5%, 48.3%, and 52.7% for 15 to 18 years, respectively.

Table 1

Anthropometric characteristics of the participating adolescents relative to gender.

Variable	All	Males	Females	p-value *
	N = 706	N = 343	N = 363
Age	16.5 ± 0.94	16.5 ± 0.89	16.5 ± 0.98	0.466
Body weight (kg)	69.2 ± 22.5	77.1 ± 24.4	61.8 ± 17.6	< 0.001
Height (cm)	162.7 ± 9.4	169.8 ± 7.1	155.9 ± 5.6	< 0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)	26.0 ± 7.4	26.6 ± 7.9	25.4 ± 6.7	0.029
Overweight or obesity status (%)
Underweight	7.0	9.1	5.0	0.001
Normal weight	43.7	36.5	50.4
Overweight	24.0	25.4	22.6
Obesity	25.4	28.9	22.0
Overweight plus obesity	49.4	54.3	44.6	0.010

Data are means ± standard deviations or percentage.

* T-test for independent samples or Chi Squares tests for the proportion.

Table 2 presents the findings of the two-way ANOVA for BMI by gender and age group. There were significant differences in BMI in the main effects of age (p = 0.038) and gender (p = 0.023), but not in the interactions of age with gender (p = 0.155).

Table 2

Two-way ANOVA for BMI among male and female adolescents by age category.

Gender	Age Groups (years)					p-value
	15	16	17	18	All
Male	25.1 ± 8.4	26.0 ± 7.2	26.5 ± 7.1	29.7 ± 10.5	26.6 ± 7.9	Age: 0.038
						Gender: 0.023
						Age by gender interactions: 0.155
Female	25.5 ± 7.4	25.2 ± 6.7	25.3 ± 6.5	25.9 ± 6.6	25.4 ± 6.7

The results of the influence of overweight or obesity status on adolescent’s perception of how their parents or friends see their weight status are shown in Table 3. There was a significant trend toward a more successful estimation of an adolescent’s overweight or obesity by parents or friends. However, there was no significant difference relative to overweight or obesity teasing by either parents or friends. About 37% of adolescents with overweight or obesity were teased very often by parents compared to about 30% without overweight or obesity. Also, 32.4% of adolescents with overweight or obesity were teased by friends. In contrast, 25.6% of adolescents without overweight or obesity were teased by friends.

Table 3

Results of cross tabulation of selected variables related to adolescents’ perception of how parents’ or friends’ see their weight status relative to an adolescent’s overweight or obesity versus non-overweight/non-obesity status.

Variable	Non-overweight or non-obesity	Overweight or obesity	p-value *
How do your parents classify your weight?			< 0.001
Underweight	37.7	5.2
Normal weight	47.9	26.2
Overweight	13.0	54.7
Obesity	1.4	14.0
Do any of your parents tease you because of your weigh?			0.152
Very often	29.9	36.8
Sometimes	69.5	62.6
Seldom/none	0.6	0.6
Do your parents compare your weight with any of your brother/sister?			0.249
I have no brother or sister	3.1	4.3
Yes	36.1	40.8
No	60.8	54.9
How do your friends classify your weight?			< 0.001
Underweight	38.0	5.2
Normal weight	57.8	33.5
Overweight	4.0	48.4
Obesity	0.3	12.8
Do any of your friends tease you because of your weigh?			0.139
Very often	25.6	32.4
Sometimes	74.1	67.3
Seldom/none	0.3	0.3

* Chi Squares tests for the differences in proportions between non-overweight or non-obesity and overweight or obesity categories.

Table 4 presents the findings of a multivariate analysis of selected variables while controlling for the effect of age and stratified by gender and obesity status. There were significant gender by obesity interactions in body weight (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.042) but not in age at puberty (p-value for the interaction = 0.696). However, age at puberty showed a significant main effect for age with a p-value < 0.001.

Table 4

Multivariable analysis of selected variables stratified by gender and obesity status while controlling for age.

Variable	Gender	Non-overweight/non-obesity	Overweight/obesity	p-value *
				Between subjects effects
Body weight (kg)	Male	58.3 ± 18.7	93.6 ± 21.9	Age: 0.010; Gender: < 0.001; Obesity status: 0.839; Gender by obesity interaction: < 0.001
	Female	50.5 ± 7.2	74.9 ± 16.6
	All	53.8 ± 8.7	84.9 ± 21.7
Height (cm)	Male	168.0 ± 7.4	171.1 ± 7.0	Age: 0.248; Gender: < 0.001; Obesity status: 0.003; Gender by obesity interaction: 0.079
	Female	155.7 ± 5.4	156.2 ± 5.9
	All	161.1 ± 9.0	164.2 ± 9.6
BMI (kg/m2)	Male	20.4 ± 2.4	31.9 ± 7.3	Age: 0.011; Gender: 0.391; Obesity status: < 0.001; Gender by obesity interaction: 0.042
	Female	20.9 ± 2.2	30.7 ± 6.3
	All	20.7 ± 2.3	31.4 ± 6.9
Age at puberty (years)	Male	13.4 ± 1.2	13.3 ± 1.2	Age: < 0.001; Gender: <0.001; Obesity status: 0.062; Gender by obesity interaction: 0.696
	Female	12.7 ± 1.3	12.5 ± 1.2
	All	13.0 ± 1.3	12.9 ± 1.2

Data are means and standard deviations.

* Wilks’ Lambda p values for the main effects of all of the variables are < 0.001; gender by obesity status interactions < 0.001.

Finally, logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender, for selected variables relative to non-overweight/non-obesity or overweight/obesity is presented in Table 5. There was a significant gender difference relative to overweight/obesity status, as females are less likely to be overweight or obese (aOR = 0.508; 95% CI = 0.327–0.789; p = 0.003). Compared to normal weight, adolescents perceived their parents as more likely to classify their weight as overweight (aOR = 4.417; 95% CI = 1.404–13.895; p = 0.011) or obese (aOR = 9.950; 95% CI = 2.847–34.766; p < 0.001). Adolescents were also more likely to see their friends classify the weight as overweight (aOR = 26.292; 95% CI = 3.336–207.192; p = 0.002) or obese (aOR = 81.850; 95% CI = 9.783–684.791; p < 0.001).

Table 5

Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender, for selected variables relative to non-overweight/non-obesity and overweight/obesity.

Variable	Non-overweight/non-obesity versus Overweight/obesity *
	aOR	(95% CI)	SEE	p-value
Age	0.873	0.694–1.097	0.117	0.244
Gender (boys = ref)	1.00
Girls	0.508	0.327–0.789	0.225	0.003
How do your parents classify your weight? (underweight = ref)	1.00
Normal weight	1.348	0.416–4.371	0.600	0.619
Overweight	4.417	1.404–13.895	0.585	0.011
Obesity	9.950	2.847–34.766	0.638	< 0.001
How do your friends classify your weight? (underweight = ref)	1.00
Normal weight	2.516	0.299–21.158	1.086	0.396
Overweight	26.292	3.336–207.192	1.053	0.002
Obesity	81.850	9.783–684.791	1.084	< 0.001

* Non-overweight/non-obese was used as a reference category. aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; ref = reference category; SEE = standard error.

Discussion

The present study intended to provide an update on the rate of overweight or obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and examine the relationship of measured overweight or obesity status with adolescents’ perception of how their parents or friends see their weight status. The main findings indicated that the prevalence of overweight or obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents was nearly 50%, with males having significantly higher overweight or obesity than females. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of obesity relative to age from 15 to 18 years old. Also, the findings showed that there was a significant trend toward a more successful estimation of an adolescents’ perception of their overweight or obesity as seen by parents or friends. In addition, logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender, revealed significant differences relative to overweight/obesity status, as females were 50% less likely to be overweight or obese. Further, adolescents perceived their parents or friends as more likely to classify their weight as overweight or obese.

Our findings on the rate of overweight and obesity in Kuwaiti adolescents are in agreement with those from other studies published over the past 15 years [2-4]. This could indicate that adolescent overweight or obesity has reached a plateau in recent years in the State of Kuwait. A comparison of our findings with those of the regional prevalence of overweight or obesity also showed similar results [24-28]. However, a recent study in Oman reported much lower overweight/obesity levels for Omani adolescent females (22.4%) and males (22.5%) [29]. The high prevalence of overweight or obesity in adolescents in the State of Kuwait and neighboring Gulf countries highlights the importance of improving lifestyle behaviors, including nutritional and exercise education in this region. Previous studies indicated that reasons for increased obesity levels among adolescents in the Gulf countries were linked to high fast food consumption, low physical activity levels, high sedentary behaviors, and increased intake of high-fat foods [30-32].

The present findings found a higher prevalence of overweight or obesity in adolescent males compared to females. These findings are consistent with the results of a cross-sectional survey conducted in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) [33]. Also, a recent systematic review revealed a very high prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, and that the prevalence increased with age, and was consistently higher in boys than girls [34]. In the current study, however, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of obesity relative to age from 15 to 18 years old. Globally, the gender difference in the prevalence of obesity among adolescents varies by country and region. BMI centiles among 15-year old adolescents in an international sample showed statistically higher rates among males in some countries (United States: 13.9%, and Greek: 10.8%) and higher prevalence among females in other countries (United States: 15.1%, and Portugal: 6.7%) [35]. Another reason for the gender differences in overweight or obesity prevalence is that the BMI cut-offs used for children and adolescents are not standardized across studies. This makes it difficult to compare obesity rates between studies because of the impact on the proportion of children defined as overweight or obese [36]. A systematic review has concluded that the gender differences in obesity rates as defined by BMI in childhood and adolescence can be traced to differences in biology, society, and culture [37].

The current study indicated that there was a significant trend toward more successful estimation of an adolescent’s overweight or obesity by parents or friends, as logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender, showed that parents and friends were significantly more likely to classify adolescents with overweight/obesity as overweight or obese. An Italian study involving children with a diverse range of body weights and obesity found that almost half of parents classified the adolescents’ weight status incorrectly and that the probability of parents correctly estimating weight status decreased with increasing BMI percentiles and was lower with boys than girls [38]. Parental underestimation of child weight status was also reported in a study from Texas, USA, where it seemed to be common among a cross-sectional sample of children and parents; the study recommended improving the parental perception of child weight [39]. Important moderators of parental underestimation of children’s overweight or obesity status were found to include parent weight, child gender, and the assessment method used (visual versus nonvisual) [40]. Furthermore, identified obesity-associated factors among Korean male and female students included underestimation and overestimation of male adolescent weight by fathers, whereas factors among females included underestimation of female adolescent weight by fathers [41]. The study concluded that parental involvement in obesity interventions could aid in preventing adolescent obesity [41].

Although there were no significant differences found in the present study in teasing adolescents because of overweight or obesity status among parents or friends, overweight or obese adolescents reported being teased “very often” due to their weight by parents (36.8%) or friends (32.4%), which was considered high. Based on the findings of a recent study, weight-related teasing is one of the most common forms of bullying in schools, particularly for obese adolescents [42]. According to a qualitative analysis by Berge et al., adolescents experienced weight-related teasing in two-thirds of households [43]. Such findings may suggest that household joking or teasing has a negative impact on an adolescent’s body appearance and self-esteem. Negative body image talk has been related to increased rates of overweight and obesity among adolescents, and therefore efforts to educate parents about the negative impact of weight-related teasing are necessary [44, 45]. Also, a longitudinal study found that weight-related teasing was quite prevalent among adolescents with overweight or obesity and that teasing from female peers led to a stronger negative relationship with weight esteem for youth with average weight [46]. In a qualitative study, some of the threats and concerns expressed by obese adolescents included lack of support from parents, trusted friends, and health-care providers and bullying, shame, guilt, and self-blame [47]. However, obese adolescents were found to perceive peers as a possible source of support [47].

The strengths of the current study included having a representative and adequate sample size. The study also used a previously validated questionnaire. Further, the study examined how parents (or friends) perceived adolescents’ weight status as seen by the adolescents themselves; other studies looked to direct perception of parents or friends to adolescent’s weight status [38–40, 43]. However, this study did have some limitations. Access to socio-economic data would have provided insight into the influences of the adolescents’ background, parents’ education, and household income. Self-reported behavioral data may also introduce bias, with the potential for under- or overestimation. In addition, the study was cross-sectional, which precludes us from inferring a causal relationship between the selected variables. In addition, physical activity was not assessed, a variable that can influence overweight or obesity status. It should also be noted that perceptions may be different in this age group (adolescents) toward themselves and others, as teenagers tend to be more sensitive at this age toward body image teasing.

Conclusion

Overweight or obesity levels appear high among Kuwaiti adolescents; about 50% of adolescents are overweight or obese, with males having significantly higher overweight or obesity than females. Also, there was a significant trend toward a more successful estimation of an adolescents’ perception of their overweight or obesity as seen by parents or friends. In addition, logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender, revealed significant differences relative to overweight/obesity status, as females were 50% less likely to be overweight or obese. Further, adolescents perceived their parents or friends as more likely to classify their weight as overweight or obese. The present study updated the information related to the prevalence of overweight or obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and showed the importance of parent’s and friend’s perception of adolescent’s weight status.

(XLS)

Click here for additional data file.

12 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-14400

Prevalence of Obesity among Kuwaiti Adolescents and its Relationship with their Perception of Body Weight as seen by Parents or Friends

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Al-Hazzaa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 24 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shahrad Taheri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

For additional information about PLOS ONE ethical requirements for human subjects research, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments/Funding Section of your manuscript:

“Professor Hazzaa M. Al-Hazzaa’s research has been funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study is interesting but have few points to consider:

Title

I suggest that the title be Prevalence of overweight and obesity among kuwaiti adolescents and the perception of body weight by parents or friends.

Keywords

I suggest replacing “weight estimation” and “obesity perception” with “body weight” and “weight perception”.

Introduction

I suggest reversing the order of references 10 and 11 in the text (lines 85-90).

Present the abbreviation of the word “body mass index” (lines 83-84) instead of putting it into methods (line 132).

Materials and Methods

Study design and participants

The researchers reported that they recruited “adolescents between the ages of 15 and 18 years” (lines 114-115). What was the criterion adopted for choosing this age group?

What was the estimated sample size? Were there losses?

How did the researchers assess whether the students suffered or not from diet-related disorders? (line 122).

Description of questionnaire

The researchers did not described about the questions “Do your parents compare your

weight with any of your brother/sister?” and “age at maturation”. How did you assess the maturation age?

Statistical analysis

In “Descriptive statistics were obtained for all variables...”, include the variables (line 157).

In the sentence “Chi-square tests of proportions were used to test differences in selected variables related to the influence of media on adolescents’ decision to lose weight...”, explain this relation of media influence (lines 160-162).

Results

The Table 3 refers to the weight status from individuals with “non-overweight or non-obesity” or “overweight or obesity”, thus why the title is written “relative to an adolescent’s overweight or obesity”?

Please, correct the 95% CI referring to the data from overweight individuals (line 201).

Discussion

The researchers mentioned that “...higher rates among males in some countries and higher prevalence among females in other countries...”, I think it is interesting to include these countries (lines 238-241).

The sentence mention about female adolescents and, what about female students? (lines 260-263).

Why did not the researchers assess the socioeconomic conditions, physical activity and food consumption? I think it is valid that you reassess and use these aspects as variables, due they are very important and can influence in the nutritional status of adolescents and in the weight perception.

Include the contributions that this study give to the society.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

15 Aug 2021

All responses are provided in the file titled "response to te reviewers' comments".

Submitted filename: Responses to the Reviewers Comments-15-8-2021.docx

Click here for additional data file.

6 Oct 2021

PONE-D-21-14400R1Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and the perception of body weight by parents or friendsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Al-Hazzaa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 20 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shahrad Taheri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: ABSTRACT

-The values in this sentence “...perceived their parents (p < 0.001) or friends (p < 0.001) as more likely to classify their weight as overweight or obese” (lines 52-53) refer to the obese individuals, not the overweight people (parents: p = 0.011 and friends: p = 0.002).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

-Describe in the manuscript when the data collection was performed.

-“Chi-square tests of independence was used to examine the relationships between overweight or obesity category and selected variables related to the influence of media on adolescents’ decision to lose weight or their perception of body thinness” (lines 164-166).

It is not clear the sentence above on the use of variables related to the influence of media on adolescents’ decision to lose weight or their perception of body thinness, because the researchers didn’t show the results/discussed about it. Furthermore, in lines 157-158 it is described that “In the present study, we used the data from part three only, which was related to body weight perception by parents or friends” and it is the part two that is related to “influence of media on dieting to lose weight”. Explain.

RESULTS

-The 95% CI datum cited in the line 208 about overweight individuals is not compatible with the informed in the Table 5.

DISCUSSION

-In the sentence “other studies published over the past ‘seven’ years [2-4]” (line 226) the reference of number 4 was published in 2004. Change the description of years.

-The researchers assessed the adolescents’ perceptions of parents’ and peers’ opinions about their weight. I think it is valid to add other studies that have assessed the same (the adolescents’ perceptions of how parents and peers assess their weight). And it would be interesting to describe the reason whereby you chose to collect this information from the adolescent, not by parents/peers. Also, in the conclusion section the researchers mentioned of importance of parents’ perception (and why not from friends?), lines 311-312.

TABLE 1 - Wouldn’t the variable “overweight or obesity status (%)” be “nutritional status”?

Notes:

-Please, when checking the mentioned lines use the manuscript with tracked changes.

-Please, review the manuscript writing, words as “Portuguese” (line 248), sentences (as in lines 270-273), among others.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

18 Oct 2021

Responses to the Reviewers Comments- Round -2

1- Reviewer #1: ABSTRACT

-The values in this sentence “...perceived their parents (p < 0.001) or friends (p < 0.001) as more likely to classify their weight as overweight or obese” (lines 52-53) refer to the obese individuals, not the overweight people (parents: p = 0.011 and friends: p = 0.002). We modified the sentence to be as follow:

Authors’ Response

We modified the sentence to be as follow:

“… that adolescents perceived their parents (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001) or friends (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) as more likely to classify their weight as overweight or obese, respectively.

2- MATERIALS AND METHODS

-Describe in the manuscript when the data collection was performed.

Authors’ Response

The data collection was performed during the fall of 2019.

3- “Chi-square tests of independence was used to examine the relationships between overweight or obesity category and selected variables related to the influence of media on adolescents’ decision to lose weight or their perception of body thinness” (lines 164-166). It is not clear the sentence above on the use of variables related to the influence of media on adolescents’ decision to lose weight or their perception of body thinness, because the researchers didn’t show the results/discussed about it.

Authors’ Response

The statement was modified to the following:

Chi-square test of independence was used to examine the relationships of selected variables related to adolescents’ perception of how parents’ or friends’ see their weight status relative to an adolescent’s overweight or obesity versus non-overweight/non-obesity status.

The results are shown in table 3.

4- Furthermore, in lines 157-158 it is described that “In the present study, we used the data from part three only, which was related to body weight perception by parents or friends” and it is the part two that is related to “influence of media on dieting to lose weight”. Explain.

Authors’ Response

It is correct that the data were from part three. However, we slightly modified the sentences to read as follow:

In the present study, we used the data from part three only, which was related to adolescent’s body weight perception as seen by parents or friends.

5- RESULTS

-The 95% CI datum cited in the line 208 about overweight individuals is not compatible with the informed in the Table 5.

Authors’ Response

Thanks for the comments. We have corrected the wrong 95% CI datum shown in page 7, line 202.

6- DISCUSSION

-In the sentence “other studies published over the past ‘seven’ years [2-4]” (line 226) the reference of number 4 was published in 2004. Change the description of years.

Authors’ Response

We corrected the sentence so to read as follow:

“… other studies published over the past 15 years [2-4].”

7- -The researchers assessed the adolescents’ perceptions of parents’ and peers’ opinions about their weight. I think it is valid to add other studies that have assessed the same (the adolescents’ perceptions of how parents and peers assess their weight). And it would be interesting to describe the reason whereby you chose to collect this information from the adolescent, not by parents/peers.

Authors’ Response

Using PubMed and Google scholar search, we were unable to locate any study related to how parents (or friends) perceived adolescents’ weight status as seen by the adolescents themselves. This is the major reason lead to the initiation of this study. It is also more important to assess the direct perception of the adolescents not the parents (or friend) about how they see other perception about their weight status.

We added a sentence in the strength of the present study indicating this aspect of the study.

8- Also, in the conclusion section the researchers mentioned of importance of parents’ perception (and why not from friends?), lines 311-312.

Authors’ Response

Thanks. We added friends as well.

9- TABLE 1 - Wouldn’t the variable “overweight or obesity status (%)” be “nutritional status”?

Authors’ Response

It can be both titles. However, we have chosen “overweight or obesity” as this is the stated definition in the extended International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) age- and sex-specific BMI cutoff reference standards [reference number 22].

10- Please, review the manuscript writing, words as “Portuguese” (line 248), sentences (as in lines 270-273), among others.

Authors’ Response

Portuguese was corrected to Portugal.

Submitted filename: Responses to the Reviewers Comments- Round -2 -8-10- 2021.pdf

Click here for additional data file.

17 Dec 2021

Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and the perception of body weight by parents or friends

PONE-D-21-14400R2

Dear Dr. Al-Hazzaa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shahrad Taheri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

23 Dec 2021

PONE-D-21-14400R2

Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Kuwaiti adolescents and the perception of body weight by parents or friends

Dear Dr. Al-Hazzaa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Shahrad Taheri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE