| Literature DB >> 34982778 |
Maya Hioki1, Nana Kanehira2, Teruhiko Koike3, Akira Saito4, Kiyoshi Shimaoka5, Hisataka Sakakibara1, Yoshiharu Oshida3, Hiroshi Akima3.
Abstract
Age-associated intramuscular adipose tissue (IntraMAT) deposition induces the development of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. However, the relationship between IntraMAT and biochemical parameters in older adults remains unclear. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to elucidate the relationship between adiponectin and echo intensity-estimated IntraMAT using ultrasonography in normal-weight older adults (men 9, women 13) and examine biochemical parameters. Blood tests were performed to determine fasting levels of glucose, insulin, hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol (Total-C), high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), free fatty acid, triglycerides (TGs), adiponectin, leptin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and high-sensitivity tumor necrosis factor, and homoeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Mean gray-scale echo intensity was calculated as the IntraMAT index of the vastus lateralis. Waist circumference was measured at the level of the navel as the visceral adipose tissue (VAT) index. Echo intensity was significantly inversely correlated with adiponectin or LDL-C, and that was significantly positively correlated with TG. Adiponectin level was inversely correlated with waist circumference. Partial correlation analysis with waist circumference as the control variable revealed that adiponectin was inversely correlated with echo intensity, independent of waist circumference, whereas no such correlation was observed after controlling for LDL-C and TG levels. When biochemical parameters were grouped in the principal component analysis, among men, Total-C, insulin, and HOMA-IR or hemoglobin A1c, and high-sensitivity tumor necrosis factor-alpha were grouped with the same distribution for factors 1 and 2. Among women, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and Total-C or TGs were grouped with the same distribution for factors 1 and 2. These data suggest that adiponectin level is related to IntraMAT content, independent of VAT in normal-weight older adults. The dynamics of adiponectin might not be similar to those of other circulating biochemical parameters in older men and women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34982778 PMCID: PMC8726469 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Participant characteristics.
| Men | Women | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants | 9 | 13 | |
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 69.4 ± 4.3 | 68.2 ± 4.6 | 0.54 |
| Height (cm) | 167.6 ± 7.2 | 151.5 ± 4.2 | 0.00 |
| Weight (kg) | 62.1 ± 7.9 | 51.5 ± 7.6 | 0.00 |
| BMI (kg·m−2) | 22.0 ± 1.6 | 22.4 ± 2.7 | 0.70 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 83.9 ± 4.2 | 81.0 ± 9.5 | 0.42 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 92.7 ± 4.0 | 91.4 ± 5.6 | 0.57 |
| WHR | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.39 |
| Fat (%) | 23.7 ± 2.5 | 33.6 ± 4.8 | 0.00 |
|
| |||
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 103.4 ± 24.2 | 90.4 ± 10.5 | 0.09 |
| Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) | 8.0 ± 7.5 | 5.6 ± 2.6 | 0.28 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 0.42 |
| Total-C (mg/dL) | 220.1 ± 31.6 | 214.8 ± 29.5 | 0.68 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 60.6 ± 15.1 | 60.5 ± 14.5 | 0.98 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 133.4 ± 26.3 | 130.8 ± 22.5 | 0.80 |
| FFAs (μEq/L) | 728.7 ± 203.1 | 731.5 ± 223.4 | 0.97 |
| TGs (mg/dL) | 111.3 ± 89.4 | 87.1 ± 38.3 | 0.39 |
| Adiponectin (μg/mL) | 10.1 ± 4.7 | 14.0 ± 10.7 | 0.32 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 8.1 ± 4.0 | 0.01 |
| hs-CRP (ng/mL) | 741.1 ± 772.4 | 4678.5 ± 13403.6 | 0.39 |
| hs-TNFα (pg/mL) | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.20 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.1 ± 2.0 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.19 |
|
| |||
| Echo intensity (a.u.) | 70.3 ± 5.9 | 70.0 ± 6.7 | 0.92 |
| Muscle thickness of VL (cm) | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 0.06 |
| Lateral subcutaneous thickness (cm) | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.00 |
Value are mean ± SD. BMI, body mass index; FFAs, free fatty acids; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homoeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hs-TNFα, high-sensitivity tumor necrosis factor–alpha; LDL-C, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; Total-C, total cholesterol; VL, vastus lateralis; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio. Only one male subject had a hs-CRP value <50 ng/mL; therefore, the value was taken as 50 ng/mL.
Fig 1PC weighting in men (a, left side) and women (b, right side). FFAs, free fatty acids; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homoeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hs-TNFα, high-sensitivity tumor necrosis factor; LDL-C, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; Total-C, total cholesterol. PC weighting was significant (>0.8).
Physical activity and dietary habit characteristics.
| Men | Women | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants (men/women) | 9 | 13 | |
| Physical activity | |||
| Number of steps | 10389.9 ± 2465.5 | 9663.4 ± 2684.1 | 0.52 |
| Light (min) | 67.1 ± 12.2 | 70.2 ± 17.8 | 0.66 |
| Moderate (min) | 35.9 ± 22.5 | 29.2 ± 17.0 | 0.43 |
| Vigorous (min) | 2.8 ± 3.1 | 1.5 ± 1.3 | 0.26 |
| Total (min) | 105.8 ± 20.2 | 100.8 ± 26.7 | 0.64 |
| Light (MET h) | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.79 |
| Moderate (MET h) | 2.5 ± 1.5 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 0.46 |
| Vigorous (MET h) | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.24 |
| Total (MET h) | 5.3 ± 1.4 | 4.8 ± 1.5 | 0.41 |
|
| |||
| Energy (kcal/body weight) | 33.7 ± 5.8 | 36.4 ± 8.6 | 0.41 |
| Carbohydrates (g/body weight) | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 4.9 ± 1.1 | 0.51 |
| Protein (g/body weight) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 0.20 |
| Fat (g/body weight) | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.08 |
Value are mean ± SD. MET h, metabolic equivalent × hours.
Pearson correlation coefficients for echo intensity, adiponectin, and leptin and body composition or biochemical parameter values.
| Echo intensity | Adiponectin | Leptin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.10 | 0.15 | −0.07 |
| BMI | 0.01 | −0.28 | 0.51 |
| Waist circumference | 0.03 | −0.46* | 0.15 |
| % Fat | 0.15 | −0.12 | 0.66 |
| Glucose | 0.20 | −0.34 | −0.05 |
| Insulin | 0.18 | −0.31 | 0.02 |
| HbA1c | 0.30 | −0.21 | 0.02 |
| Total-C | −0.43 | 0.26 | −0.29 |
| HDL-C | −0.49 | 0.40 | −0.19 |
| LDL-C | −0.47 | 0.12 | −0.15 |
| FFAs | 0.15 | −0.15 | 0.18 |
| TGs | 0.52* | −0.32 | −0.07 |
| hs-CRP | 0.17 | −0.15 | 0.77 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.20 | −0.33 | 0.03 |
| hs-TNFα | −0.07 | −0.08 | −0.09 |
| Lateral subcutaneous thickness | −0.33 | 0.42* | 0.34 |
| Muscle thickness | −0.56** | 0.24 | −0.12 |
*, p < 0.05
**p < 0.01.
BMI, body mass index; FFAs, free fatty acids; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homoeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hs-TNFα, high-sensitivity tumor necrosis factor α; LDL-C, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; Total-C, total cholesterol.
Fig 2Relationship between echo intensity and adiponectin.
Partial correlation coefficients between adiponectin and echo intensity.
| Control variables |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Waist circumference | −0.47 | 0.03 |
| TGs | −0.33 | 0.14 |
| LDL-C | −0.43 | 0.05 |
| Lateral subcutaneous thickness | −0.34 | 0.12 |
| Muscle thickness | −0.37 | 0.09 |
LDL-C, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides.