Oludoyinmola O Ojifinni1, Latifat Ibisomi2,3. 1. School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. oludoyinmola@gmail.com. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 3. Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Preconception care (PCC) is a recognised strategy for optimising maternal health and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. PCC services are minimally available and not fully integrated into maternal health services in Nigeria. This study explored perceptions about PCC services among health care providers in Ibadan, Nigeria. METHODS: Using a qualitative case study design the perspectives of 26 health care providers-16 specialist physicians and nine nurses covering 10 specialties at the primary, secondary and tertiary health care levels was explored. In-depth interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed on MAXQDA using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Almost all participants stated that PCC services should be offered at all three levels of health care with referral when needed between lower and higher levels. Participants stated that although all people of reproductive age would benefit from PCC, those who had medical problems like hypertension, sickle cell disease, diabetes and infertility would benefit more. Participants opined that delayed health care seeking observed in the community may influence acceptability of PCC especially for people without known pre-existing conditions. All specialist physicians identified the relevance of PCC to their practice. They identified potential benefits of PCC including opportunity to prepare for pregnancy to ensure positive pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preconception care is perceived as important for promoting positive pregnancy outcomes in people with known medical problems and is relevant to different specialities of medical practice. Provision of the service will require establishment of guidelines and uptake will depend on acceptability to community members who will benefit from the service.
OBJECTIVES: Preconception care (PCC) is a recognised strategy for optimising maternal health and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. PCC services are minimally available and not fully integrated into maternal health services in Nigeria. This study explored perceptions about PCC services among health care providers in Ibadan, Nigeria. METHODS: Using a qualitative case study design the perspectives of 26 health care providers-16 specialist physicians and nine nurses covering 10 specialties at the primary, secondary and tertiary health care levels was explored. In-depth interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed on MAXQDA using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Almost all participants stated that PCC services should be offered at all three levels of health care with referral when needed between lower and higher levels. Participants stated that although all people of reproductive age would benefit from PCC, those who had medical problems like hypertension, sickle cell disease, diabetes and infertility would benefit more. Participants opined that delayed health care seeking observed in the community may influence acceptability of PCC especially for people without known pre-existing conditions. All specialist physicians identified the relevance of PCC to their practice. They identified potential benefits of PCC including opportunity to prepare for pregnancy to ensure positive pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preconception care is perceived as important for promoting positive pregnancy outcomes in people with known medical problems and is relevant to different specialities of medical practice. Provision of the service will require establishment of guidelines and uptake will depend on acceptability to community members who will benefit from the service.
Authors: Nathalie V Kizirian; Kirsten I Black; Loretta Musgrave; Charlotte Hespe; Adrienne Gordon Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2019-02-17 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Merry-K Moos; Anne L Dunlop; Brian W Jack; Lauren Nelson; Dean V Coonrod; Richard Long; Kim Boggess; Paula M Gardiner Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 8.661