Literature DB >> 34982120

Association Between Maternal Hormonal Contraception Use and Central Nervous System Tumors in Children.

Marie Hargreave1, Lina S Mørch1,2, Jeanette F Winther3,4, Kjeld Schmiegelow5,6, Susanne K Kjaer1,7.   

Abstract

Importance: The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in children appears to be increasing, yet few risk factors are established. There is limited information regarding whether maternal hormonal contraception use increases this risk. Objective: To examine the association between maternal hormonal contraception use and CNS tumors in children (<20 years). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this nationwide cohort study based on population-based registry data, 1 185 063 children born in Denmark between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2014, were followed up for a diagnosis of a CNS tumor (final follow-up on December 31, 2018). Exposures: Maternal hormonal contraception use was analyzed according to any use, regimen (combined/progestin only), and route of administration (oral/nonoral), categorized as recent use (≤3 months before start and during pregnancy), previous use (>3 months before start of pregnancy), and no use. For injections, implants, and intrauterine devices that are used for a different time period, the categorization was appropriately altered. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratio (HR) and incidence rate difference (IRD) of CNS tumors diagnosed at younger than 20 years.
Results: After 15 335 990 person-years of follow-up (mean follow-up, 12.9 years), 725 children were diagnosed with a CNS tumor. The mean age at diagnosis was 7 years, and 342 (47.2%) of the diagnosed children were female. The adjusted incidence rate of CNS tumors per 100 000 person-years was 5.0 for children born to mothers with recent hormonal contraception use (n = 136 022), 4.5 for children born to mothers with previous use (n = 778 843), and 5.3 for children born to mothers with no use (n = 270 198). The corresponding HRs were 0.95 ([95% CI, 0.74-1.23]; 84 children with CNS tumors; IRD, -0.3 [95% CI, -1.6 to 1.0]) for recent use and 0.86 ([95% CI, 0.72-1.02]; 421 children with CNS tumors; IRD, -0.8 [95% CI, -1.7 to 0.0]) for previous use, compared with no use. No statistically significant associations were found for recent or previous use of oral combined, nonoral combined, oral progestin only, or nonoral products compared with no use of hormonal contraception. Conclusions and Relevance: Among Danish children, there was no statistically significant association between any maternal hormonal contraception use and CNS tumor risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34982120      PMCID: PMC8728605          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.22482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   157.335


  28 in total

1.  Contraception of women with intellectual disability: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  L Servais; D Jacques; R Leach; L Conod; P Hoyois; B Dan; J P Roussaux
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2002-02

2.  International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition.

Authors:  Eva Steliarova-Foucher; Charles Stiller; Brigitte Lacour; Peter Kaatsch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Steroid contraceptive use and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  T Pardthaisong; R H Gray; E B McDaniel; A Chandacham
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1988-07

4.  Maternal and perinatal risk factors for childhood brain tumors (Sweden).

Authors:  M S Linet; G Gridley; S Cnattingius; H S Nicholson; U Martinsson; B Glimelius; H O Adami; M Zack
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Risk factors for astrocytic glioma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the brain in young children: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

Authors:  G R Bunin; J D Buckley; C P Boesel; L B Rorke; A T Meadows
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1994 Apr-May       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Epigenetics in cancer: targeting chromatin modifications.

Authors:  Leigh Ellis; Peter W Atadja; Ricky W Johnstone
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Diethylstilboestrol and diethylstilboestrol dipropionate.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum       Date:  1979-12

8.  Antenatal risk factors for malignant brain tumours in New South Wales children.

Authors:  M McCredie; P Maisonneuve; P Boyle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-01-02       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Are pediatric brain tumors on the rise in the USA? Significant incidence and survival findings from the SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Swetal Patel; Amit Bhatnagar; Christopher Wear; Stephen Osiro; Abigail Gabriel; David Kimball; Alana John; Paul J Fields; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 10.  Childhood brain tumor epidemiology: a brain tumor epidemiology consortium review.

Authors:  Kimberly J Johnson; Jennifer Cullen; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Quinn T Ostrom; Chelsea E Langer; Michelle C Turner; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; James L Fisher; Philip J Lupo; Sonia Partap; Judith A Schwartzbaum; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Promising Chemotherapy for Malignant Pediatric Brain Tumor in Recent Biological Insights.

Authors:  Qian Zhou; Yichen Xu; Yan Zhou; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.