| Literature DB >> 34981761 |
Danny Axford1, Peter J Judge2, Juan F Bada Juarez2, Tristan O C Kwan3, James Birch1, Javier Vinals2, Anthony Watts2, Isabel Moraes3.
Abstract
Room-temperature diffraction methods are highly desirable for dynamic studies of biological macromolecules, since they allow high-resolution structural data to be collected as proteins undergo conformational changes. For crystals grown in lipidic cubic phase (LCP), an extruder is commonly used to pass a stream of microcrystals through the X-ray beam; however, the sample quantities required for this method may be difficult to produce for many membrane proteins. A more sample-efficient environment was created using two layers of low X-ray transmittance polymer films to mount crystals of the archaerhodopsin-3 (AR3) photoreceptor and room-temperature diffraction data were acquired. By using transparent and opaque polymer films, two structures, one corresponding to the desensitized, dark-adapted (DA) state and the other to the ground or light-adapted (LA) state, were solved to better than 1.9 Å resolution. All of the key structural features of AR3 were resolved, including the retinal chromophore, which is present as the 13-cis isomer in the DA state and as the all-trans isomer in the LA state. The film-sandwich sample environment enables diffraction data to be recorded at room temperature in both illuminated and dark conditions, which more closely approximate those in vivo. This simple approach is applicable to a wide range of membrane proteins crystallized in LCP and light-sensitive samples in general at synchrotron and laboratory X-ray sources. open access.Entities:
Keywords: LCP; archaerhodopsin; lipidic cubic phase; membrane proteins; microbial rhodopsin; photoreceptors; polymer films; proton transport; retinal; room temperature; synchrotron; thin-film sample
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34981761 PMCID: PMC8725165 DOI: 10.1107/S2059798321011220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol ISSN: 2059-7983 Impact factor: 7.652
Figure 1Film sample mounts and diffraction screening. (a) Polymer film sample mounts held on DiffraX pins ready for data collection: black Kapton film (left) and transparent COP (right). (b) Results of a diffraction raster scan on the dark Kapton sample preparation as a heat map indicating the locations of crystals. The colour map (blue through yellow to red) indicates an increasing number of Bragg spots as determined by the DIALS software package (Gerstel et al., 2019 ▸).
Data-collection and refinement statistics
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| PDB code |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Data collection | ||
| Temperature (K) | 293 | 293 |
| No. of crystals | 18 | 3 |
| Space group |
|
|
|
| 45.91, 48.35, 105.36 | 46.25, 48.30, 104.84 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90, 90, 90 | 90, 90, 90 |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.96862 | 0.96862 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 105.36–1.85 (1.88–1.85) | 52.42–1.90 (1.99–1.90) |
| No. of unique observations | 18417 (876) | 20412 (1214) |
| Completeness (%) | 89.2 (88.1) | 91.1 (93.7) |
| Multiplicity | 8.5 (5.6) | 5.0 (4.9) |
|
| 0.126 (0.623) | 0.084 (0.338) |
|
| 0.401 (1.380) | 0.199 (0.802) |
| CC1/2 | 0.995 (0.316) | 0.984 (0.675) |
| Mean | 6.6 (1.3) | 4.9 (2.1) |
| Wilson | 21.6 | 17.4 |
| Refinement | ||
| Resolution range (Å) | 52.68–1.85 | 35.52–1.90 |
| No. of observations (total/test set) | 17485/970 | 16103/818 |
| Completeness (%) | 89.2 | 88.2 |
|
| 0.18/0.19 | 0.18/0.22 |
| No. of atoms | ||
| Protein | 3811 | 3788 |
| Ligand/ion | 435 | 370 |
| Waters | 73 | 56 |
| Average | 26.54 | 21.78 |
| R.m.s. deviations | ||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Bond angles (°) | 0.951 | 1.462 |
| Ramachandran plot | ||
| Outliers (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Allowed (%) | 1.79 | 1.79 |
| Favoured (%) | 98.21 | 98.21 |
See Section 3 for an explanation of the relatively low completeness.
R p.i.m. is the multiplicity-weighted, precision-indicating merging R factor for comparing symmetry-related reflections (Weiss & Hilgenfeld, 1997 ▸).
R meas is the redundancy-independent multiplicity-weighted R factor for comparing symmetry-related reflections (Diederichs & Karplus, 1997 ▸).
Figure 2Retinal-binding pocket. Conformations of retinal (coloured in light and dark pink) in (a) the DA state (PDB entry 6s63) and (b) the LA state (PDB entry 6guz) of AR3. The blue mesh in (a) and (b) around retinal and Lys226 represents the 2F obs − F calc electron-density map contoured at 1.5σ. Omit maps are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3. (c) Overlay of composite omit maps (2F obs − F calc) of the DA (PDB entry 6s63; grey) and LA (PDB entry 6guz; white) states for retinal and selected amino acids from the surrounding binding pocket. The electron-density maps (LA, blue mesh; DA, green mesh) for the two structures were created using Phenix and are contoured at 1.0σ. The differences in the distributions of electron density surrounding the β-ionone ring and the C13=C14 bond are indicated by yellow arrows. Water molecules are represented by grey and white spheres. All images were created using PyMOL.
Figure 3Structures of the pentagonal hydrogen-bond networks in AR3 at room and cryogenic temperatures. The pentagonal hydrogen-bond networks in the DA (PDB entry 6s63) and LA (PDB entry 6guz) states of AR3 at room temperature are shown in (a) and (b), respectively, while in (c) and (d) the pentagonal hydrogen-bond networks in the DA (PDB entry 6gux) and LA (PDB entry 6s6c) states of AR3, respectively, at cryogenic temperatures are shown. Water molecules are shown as red spheres and predicted hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed yellow lines. The blue mesh represents the 2F obs − F calc electron-density map contoured at 1.5σ. Omit maps are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4.