Literature DB >> 34981509

Deep brain stimulation targets in epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of anterior and centromedian thalamic nuclei and hippocampus.

Artur Vetkas1,2, Anton Fomenko1,3, Jürgen Germann1, Can Sarica1, Christian Iorio-Morin4, Nardin Samuel1, Kazuaki Yamamoto1, Vanessa Milano1, Cletus Cheyuo1, Ajmal Zemmar5, Gavin Elias1, Alexandre Boutet1,6, Aaron Loh1, Brendan Santyr1,7, Dave Gwun1, Jordy Tasserie1, Suneil K Kalia1,8, Andres M Lozano1,8.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory treatment used in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The primary goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to describe recent advancements in the field of DBS for epilepsy, to compare the results of published trials, and to clarify the clinical utility of DBS in DRE. A systematic literature search was performed by two independent authors. Forty-four articles were included in the meta-analysis (23 for anterior thalamic nucleus [ANT], 8 for centromedian thalamic nucleus [CMT], and 13 for hippocampus) with a total of 527 patients. The mean seizure reduction after stimulation of the ANT, CMT, and hippocampus in our meta-analysis was 60.8%, 73.4%, and 67.8%, respectively. DBS is an effective and safe therapy in patients with DRE. Based on the results of randomized controlled trials and larger clinical series, the best evidence exists for DBS of the anterior thalamic nucleus. Further randomized trials are required to clarify the role of CMT and hippocampal stimulation. Our analysis suggests more efficient deep brain stimulation of ANT for focal seizures, wider use of CMT for generalized seizures, and hippocampal DBS for temporal lobe seizures. Factors associated with clinical outcome after DBS for epilepsy are electrode location, stimulation parameters, type of epilepsy, and longer time of stimulation. Recent advancements in anatomical targeting, functional neuroimaging, responsive neurostimulation, and sensing of local field potentials could potentially lead to improved outcomes after DBS for epilepsy and reduced sudden, unexpected death of patients with epilepsy. Biomarkers are needed for successful patient selection, targeting of electrodes and optimization of stimulation parameters.
© 2022 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANT; CMT; DBS; focal; seizures

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34981509     DOI: 10.1111/epi.17157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  5 in total

1.  Reconfiguration of static and dynamic thalamo-cortical network functional connectivity of epileptic children with generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Authors:  Yongxin Li; Jianping Wang; Xiao Wang; Qian Chen; Bing Qin; Jiaxu Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 2.  Centromedian thalamic neuromodulation for the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Andrew J Zillgitt; M Ayman Haykal; Ahmad Chehab; Michael D Staudt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Does Deep Brain Stimulation Work in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome? Well…it Depends.

Authors:  Gewalin Aungaroon
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 7.872

4.  ANT-DBS in epilepsy shows no effect on selected neuropsychiatric tests.

Authors:  Helle Herrman; Kåre Osnes; Arild Egge; Ane Konglund; Jon Ramm-Pettersen; Espen Dietrichs; Erik Taubøll
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.915

5.  Small nuclei identification with a hemispherical brain PET.

Authors:  Miwako Takahashi; Go Akamatsu; Yuma Iwao; Hideaki Tashima; Eiji Yoshida; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-10-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.