Literature DB >> 34981325

Telehealth: Increasing Access to Bariatric Surgery in Minority Populations.

Francisco Schlottmann1, Nicolas H Dreifuss2, Mario A Masrur2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34981325      PMCID: PMC8723708          DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05876-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   3.479


× No keyword cloud information.
Obesity prevalence has risen dramatically worldwide during the last decades. Recent data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys showed that over 40% of the adult population is obese in the USA, with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic adults having the highest prevalence of obesity [1]. Obese individuals have a significantly higher risk of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, stroke, and cancer among other health problems [2]. Compared to medical treatment, bariatric surgery has shown greater likelihood of remission of obesity-related comorbidities [3]. Therefore, improving access to bariatric surgery programs is a critical public health matter. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many aspects of the healthcare system. The reduction of face-to-face clinical encounters (whenever possible) along with the development of telemedicine/telehealth platforms was one of the main strategies adopted by many institutions. Interestingly, the “forced” implementation of telemedicine might have helped improving care of patients in different clinical and surgical specialties. Specifically in bariatric surgery, multiple programs adopted the use of telemedicine for delivering healthcare to their patients, and both patients and providers exhibited high levels of satisfaction with this new care modality. For instance, in a recent survey study conducted by a weight management program, over 90% of patients reported feeling comfortable interacting with their provider through telemedicine, around 73% were satisfied with their visit, and 85% of providers reported spending the same or less time as compared to in-person visits [4]. The traditional model requires patients to travel to healthcare facilities in order to seek care. For bariatric surgery candidates, multiple appointments with different members of a multidisciplinary team are often needed during the process (surgeon, nutritionist, dietician, psychologist, etc.). Unfortunately, access to care can be threaten by long travel distances to the facility, lack of logistic resources (e.g., transportation), or socio-economic factors (e.g., inability/fear to obtain time-off from work). In fact, previous research has shown that greater travel distance to the follow-up center was one of the main factors associated with attrition in bariatric aftercare [5]. The telemedicine approach is indeed attractive because it can potentially save time and money to patients while helping overcoming common barriers to care. In April 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Illinois at Chicago implemented the telehealth clinics service for patients seeking bariatric surgery. Healthcare providers were trained for obtaining competency in delivering care through this modality, and administrative support was available to coordinate and assist telehealth appointments. During April, May, and June, only telehealth visits were allowed. After that, a hybrid system with both telehealth and in-person visits was available. In our healthcare network, patients are usually referred to the bariatric surgery team by other providers (mainly primary care physicians). However, no-show rates for the first consultation have been historically relatively high. Interestingly, we noticed that the monthly no-show rates for the first visit considerably declined after the implementation of telehealth (from 39.3 to 16.6%) (Fig. 1). While we are aware that several factors might have played a role in this decline, we strongly believe that the alternative of telehealth visit contributed to the higher show-up rates. For instance, we have noticed in many opportunities that patients were taking a brief break from the work duties or were taking care of their kids during consultations.
Fig. 1

Monthly no-show rates for the first bariatric surgery consultation at the University of Illinois at Chicago

Monthly no-show rates for the first bariatric surgery consultation at the University of Illinois at Chicago Access to a computer or mobile device with internet connection and the knowledge needed to use the technology are potential barriers for the use of telehealth. A combination of telemedicine and in-person visit options is thereby a reasonable strategy. Remarkably, our patients’ population is mostly represented by African Americans (50%) and Hispanics (20%) [6], who often suffer from healthcare disparities [7]. Even among this vulnerable population, our telehealth platform was associated with increased show-up rates. A recent study on telehealth utilization among patients with obesity showed that older age was inversely associated with telemedicine use and non-Hispanic black were more likely to use telehealth compared to non-Hispanic white [8]. The young mean age of our patients (41.6 years) [6] might also be related to the high adherence to telemedicine. Considering that less than 1% of the patients who are eligible for weight loss procedures undergo bariatric surgery, and around 50% of patients who initiate the process in a bariatric program do not undergo surgery [9], strategies to improve access to bariatric surgery are much needed. The broad emergence of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic is a great opportunity to explore how the adoption of newer technologies can facilitate access to care. Infrastructure support (building and implementing operational systems), telehealth training for providers, and constant analysis of potential patient-related barriers for the use of telemedicine seemed to be critical to obtain a successful telehealth practice [10]. In our program, implementation of telehealth was associated with a remarkable decrease on the no-show rates of first bariatric surgery consultations. Telehealth is a powerful tool for delivering multidisciplinary and effective obesity care. Therefore, telemedicine visits should remain as a care option even when the pandemic subsides. Further research should be focused on how to effectively embrace, maintain, and enhance telehealth medicine in bariatric surgery.
  10 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Weight Loss After Metabolic Surgery in a Multiethnic Sample of 1012 Patients.

Authors:  Mario Masrur; Roberto Bustos; Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen; Luis Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; Alberto Mangano; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Ronak Patel; Kirstie K Danielson; Antonio Gangemi; Enrique Fernando Elli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Association of Race, Health Insurance Status, and Household Income With Location and Outcomes of Ambulatory Surgery Among Adult Patients in 2 US States.

Authors:  Megan G Janeway; Sabrina E Sanchez; Qi Chen; Maia R Nofal; Na Wang; Amy Rosen; Tracey A Dechert
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Telehealth utilization among multi-ethnic patients with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jaime P Almandoz; Luyu Xie; Jeffrey N Schellinger; M Sunil Mathew; Khary Edwards; Ashley Ofori; Sachin Kukreja; Benjamin Schneider; Sarah E Messiah
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 4.  Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Irina Moroshko; Leah Brennan; Paul O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Craig M Hales; Margaret D Carroll; Cheryl D Fryar; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2020-02

6.  Association of Bariatric Surgery vs Medical Obesity Treatment With Long-term Medical Complications and Obesity-Related Comorbidities.

Authors:  Gunn Signe Jakobsen; Milada Cvancarova Småstuen; Rune Sandbu; Njord Nordstrand; Dag Hofsø; Morten Lindberg; Jens Kristoffer Hertel; Jøran Hjelmesæth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine in a Comprehensive Weight Management Program.

Authors:  Ralph Wesley Vosburg; Kortney A Robinson; Chuanyun Gao; Julie J Kim
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 8.  The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daphne P Guh; Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Zubin Amarsi; C Laird Birmingham; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Improving obesity treatment through telemedicine: increasing access to bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Grace F Chao; Anne P Ehlers; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 10.  Practical considerations of developing and conducting a successful telehealth practice in response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Colleen Tewksbury; Mary Elisabeth Deleener; Kristoffel R Dumon; Noel N Williams
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.080

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral Interventions After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Colleen Tewksbury; Kellene A Isom
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Investigating discrepancies in demand and access for bariatric surgery across different demographics in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Aashna Mehta; Wireko Andrew Awuah; Jacob Kalmanovich; Helen Huang; Resham Tanna; Duaa Javed Iqbal; Tulika Garg; Halil Ibrahim Bulut; Toufik Abdul-Rahman; Mohammad Mehedi Hasan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.