| Literature DB >> 34981190 |
Bolaji Thanni1,2, Roel Merckx3, Pieterjan De Bauw3, Margaux Boeraeve4, Gerrit Peeters4, Stefan Hauser5, Olivier Honnay4.
Abstract
Cassava, forming starch-rich, tuberous roots, is an important staple crop in smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Its relatively good tolerance to drought and nutrient-poor soils may be partly attributed to the crop's association with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF). Yet insights into AMF-community composition and richness of cassava, and knowledge of its environmental drivers are still limited. Here, we sampled 60 cassava fields across three major cassava-growing agro-ecological zones in Nigeria and used a DNA meta-barcoding approach to quantify large-scale spatial variation and evaluate the effects of soil characteristics and common agricultural practices on AMF community composition, richness and Shannon diversity. We identified 515 AMF operational taxonomic units (OTUs), dominated by Glomus, with large variation across agro-ecological zones, and with soil pH explaining most of the variation in AMF community composition. High levels of soil available phosphorus reduced OTU richness without affecting Shannon diversity. Long fallow periods (> 5 years) reduced AMF richness compared with short fallows, whereas both zero tillage and tractor tillage reduced AMF diversity compared with hoe tillage. This study reveals that the symbiotic relationship between cassava and AMF is strongly influenced by soil characteristics and agricultural management and that it is possible to adjust cassava cultivation practices to modify AMF diversity and community structure.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural practices; Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Biodiversity; Cassava; Next-generation sequencing; Soil chemical properties
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34981190 PMCID: PMC8786768 DOI: 10.1007/s00572-021-01058-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycorrhiza ISSN: 0940-6360 Impact factor: 3.387
Fig. 1Relative abundances of AMF in the roots of cassava in three agroecology zones in Nigeria. (a) Relative read abundance (%) of AMF families present in cassava root samples. (b) Relative read abundance (%) of AMF genera present in cassava root samples. (c) Relative read abundance (%) of AMF genera present in cassava root samples excluding the genus Glomus
Fig. 2The difference in diversity indices in 60 cassava fields across three agroecology zones in Nigeria. (a) AMF richness, (b) Log (Exp H’). Bars represent estimated marginal means. Bars topped by the same letter do not differ significantly by Tukey HSD post hoc tests on GLMM and LMM models with fields as random factors
Effects of soil chemical properties and management practices on AMF richness and Log(Exp(H’)). Results for AMF richness were inferred from a generalized linear mixed model with Poisson distribution, while that of Log(Exp(H’)) was inferred using a linear mixed model
| AMF richness | Log(Exp(H’)) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate + SE | Estimate + SE | |||||
| (Intercept) | 351.020.06 | 12.91 | 2.34 ± 0.31 | 7.48 | ||
| Olsen P (mg kg−1) | − 0.17 ± 0.05 | − 3.61 | − 0.08 ± 0.05 | − 1.59 | 0.11 | |
| pH | 0.04 ± 0.05 | 0.83 | 0.41 | − 0.03 ± 0.05 | − 0.62 | 0.53 |
| Total N (g kg−1) | 0.85 ± 0.32 | 2.59 | − 0.40 ± 0.38 | 1.05 | 0.29 | |
| Organic carbon (%) | − 0.64 ± 0.02 | − 2.16 | 0.03 | − 0.23 ± 0.34 | − 0.68 | 0.49 |
| Mounds | − 0.012 ± 0.09 | − 0.15 | 0.89 | 0.01 ± 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.93 |
| Ridge | 0.01 ± 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.87 | 0.08 ± 0.09 | 0.72 | 0.39 |
| Zero plough | 0.08 ± 0.07 | 1.10 | 0.27 | − 0.16 ± 0.08 | − 1.96 | |
| Tractor ploughed | − 0.17 ± 0.10 | − 1.67 | 0.09 | − 0.36 ± 0.11 | − 3.01 | |
| Fallow period > 5 yrs | − 0.42 ± 0.09 | − 4.36 | − 0.15 ± 0.11 | − 1.32 | ||
Values are means followed by standard errors
Fig. 3The means of AMF diversity indices in 60 cassava fields across six states in Nigeria based on some agricultural practices. (A) AMF richness as affected by fallow periods. (B) Exp H’ as affected by fallow periods. (C) AMF richness as affected by tillage. (D) Exp H’ as affected by tillage. Boxplots topped by the same letter do not differ significantly by Tukey HSD post hoc tests. The horizontal line in the middle of the box is the median value of the scores and the lower and upper boundaries indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whisker presents the smallest/largest value greater/less than the lower /upper quantile minus/plus times the interquartile range where outliers fall beyond whiskers
Results of the permutation tests of the canonical redundancy analysis (RDA) testing for significant relationships between AMF communities and explanatory matrices in the root of cassava in 60 sampling fields in three agro-ecological zones in Nigeria (by forward selection). Results are based on 999 permutations
| Df | Variance | Pr(> | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fallow | 1 | 0.011 | 3.60 | 0.001 |
| Tillage | 2 | 0.022 | 3.55 | 0.001 |
| Soil shaping | 2 | 0.011 | 1.79 | 0.006 |
| pH | 1 | 0.041 | 13.17 | 0.001 |
| Olsen P | 1 | 0.011 | 3.66 | 0.001 |
| Total N | 1 | 0.012 | 3.85 | 0.001 |
| Organic carbon | 1 | 0.005 | 1.73 | 0.023 |
Fig. 4Ordination plot of the redundancy analysis (RDA) of AMF communities in the root of cassava in 60 sampling locations in three agroecology zones in Nigeria showing the effects of soil chemical properties and soil management practices on AMF composition. Arrows indicate environmental variables explaining a significant proportion of the AMF communities (as determined with forward selection, Table 2). Ellipses represent confidence regions based on SD from the centroid for management practice: green for hoe tillage, black for no-tillage and red for tractor tillage
Fig. 5Venn diagrams depicting variance partitioning of three groups of explanatory variables, geographical distance (Distance), soil chemical properties (SCP) and soil management practices (SMPs). The overlap represents shared variation among explanatory matrices. Numbers indicate adjusted R2 values