| Literature DB >> 34981062 |
Ana C Puhl, Giovanni F Gomes, Samara Damasceno, Ethan J Fritch, James A Levi, Nicole J Johnson, Frank Scholle, Lakshmanane Premkumar, Brett L Hurst, Felipe LeeMontiel, Flavio P Veras, Sabrina S Batah, Alexandre T Fabro, Nathaniel J Moorman, Boyd L Yount, Rebekah Dickmander, Ralph Baric, Kenneth H Pearce, Fernando Q Cunha, José C Alves-Filho, Thiago M Cunha, Sean Ekins.
Abstract
The portfolio of SARS-CoV-2 small molecule drugs is currently limited to a handful that are either approved (remdesivir), emergency approved (dexamethasone, baricitinib) or in advanced clinical trials. We have tested 45 FDA-approved kinase inhibitors in vitro against murine hepatitis virus (MHV) as a model of SARS-CoV-2 replication and identified 12 showing inhibition in the delayed brain tumor (DBT) cell line. Vandetanib, which targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and the RET-tyrosine kinase showed the most promising results on inhibition versus toxic effect on SARS-CoV-2-infected Caco-2 and A549-hACE2 cells (IC 50 0.79 μM) while also showing a reduction of > 3 log TCID 50 /mL for HCoV-229E. The in vivo efficacy of vandetanib was assessed in a mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and statistically significantly reduced the levels of IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and mitigated inflammatory cell infiltrates in the lungs of infected animals but did not reduce viral load. Vandetanib rescued the decreased IFN-1β caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice to levels similar to that in uninfected animals. Our results indicate that the FDA-approved vandetanib is a potential therapeutic candidate for COVID-19 positioned for follow up in clinical trials either alone or in combination with other drugs to address the cytokine storm associated with this viral infection.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34981062 PMCID: PMC8722599 DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.16.472155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: bioRxiv
Figure 1.Characterization of entrectinib and vandetanib. SARS-CoV-2 inhibition in A549-ACE2 cell lines and cytotoxicity of A) remdesivir B) entrectinib and C) vandetanib. D) EC90 and CC50 values for entrectinib and vandetanib (strain USA_WA1/2020) in Caco-2 cells. Only VYR data was reported. E) HCoV229E antiviral assay and in Huh-7 cell line with entrectinib and F) vandetanib. G) MicroScale Thermophoresis binding analysis for the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD and entrectinib. H) Pseudo SARS-CoV-2 D614G baculovirus (Montana Molecular #C1110G, #C1120G) assay in presence of vandetanib at 1 μM and its I) graphical analysis.
Figure 2:In vivo efficacy of Vandetanib in a mouse model of COVID-19.
A) Experimental timeline: K18-hAce2 tg mice were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (2 × 104 PFU/40 μL saline, intranasal) or mock. One group of mice was treated with Vandetanib (25 mg/kg i.p.) 1 h before virus inoculation. B) Body weight was evaluated daily. C) At 3 DPI, mice were euthanized and the C) lung viral load, and D-E) Lung histopathology were evaluated. *** p<0.001 as compared with mock group after one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. ### p<0.001 as compared with infected group after one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. Bar scales = 20x – 125 μm; 40x – 50 μm.
Figure 3:Effects of Vandetanib on SARS-CoV-2-induced lung inflammation in a mouse model of COVID-19.
A) Expression of INF-1β quantified by qPCR. Levels of B) INF-1β, C) IL-6, D) TNF-α, E) CCL4, F) CCL2, G) CCL3, H) IL-10, I) CXCL1, J) CXCL2, and K) CXCL10 measured by ELISA. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, and *** p<0.001 as compared with mock group after one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. # p<0.05 and ## p<0.01 as compared with infected group after one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test.