| Literature DB >> 34980155 |
Qinling Zhu1,2, Yue Yao1,2, Lizhen Xu1,2, Hasiximuke Wu1,2, Wangsheng Wang1,2, Yaqiong He1,2, Yuan Wang1,2, Yao Lu1,2, Jia Qi1,2, Ying Ding1,2, Xinyu Li1,2, Jiaan Huang1,2, Hanting Zhao1,2, Yanzhi Du1,2, Kang Sun3,4, Yun Sun5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) contributes to ovarian dysfunctions in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients. Serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) is an acute phase protein produced primarily by the liver in response to inflammation. In addition to its role in inflammation, SAA1 may participate in IR development in peripheral tissues. Yet, expressional regulation of SAA1 in the ovary and its role in the pathogenesis of ovarian IR in PCOS remain elusive.Entities:
Keywords: Granulosa cells; Inflammation; Insulin resistance; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Serum amyloid A1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34980155 PMCID: PMC8721971 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00873-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Clinical characteristics and cycle outcomes of recruited subjects with PCOS or without PCOS
| Non-PCOS without IR | Non-PCOS with IR | PCOS without IR | PCOS with IR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
| Age (y) | 29.6 ± 0.93 | 29.8 ± 0.81 | 29.8 ± 0.7 | 28.1 ± 0.96 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.7 ± 0.41 | 26 ± 0.45 *# | 23.7 ± 0.66 | 26.7 ± 0.85*# |
| WBC (counts*109) | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 7.2 ± 0.4* |
| CRP (mg/L) | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.5* |
| Basal FSH (mIU/ml) | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 6.1 ± 0.45 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.5 |
| Basal LH (mIU/ml) | 4.5 ± 0.47 | 3.9 ± 0.45 | 8.5 ± 0.94 *& | 7.1 ± 0.98 *& |
| LH/FSH | 0.7 ± 0.07 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.14 *& | 1.2 ± 0.14 *& |
| T (nM/L) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.85 ± 0.12 | 1.1 ± 0.16 *& | 1.2 ± 0.34*& |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 11.1 ± 1.4 *& | 8.7 ± 1.1*& |
| Fasting glucose (mM/L) | 5.1 ± 0.07 | 5.4 ± 0.13 | 4.8 ± 0.14 | 5.2 ± 0.12 |
| Fasting insulin (IU/ml) | 4.8 ± 0.69 | 14 ± 1.05 *# | 6.8 ± 0.53 | 18.9 ± 2.8 *# |
| HOMA-IR | 1.1 ± 0.15 | 3.3 ± 0.24 *# | 1.43 ± 0.11 | 4.3 ± 0.61*# |
| No. of oocytes retrieved | 12.6 ± 1.9 | 12.1 ± 1.6 | 18.6 ± 2 *& | 20.1 ± 3.3 *& |
| IVF percentage (%) | 50 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 56.25 |
| ICSI percentage (%) | 50 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 43.75 |
| Fertilization rate | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 0.63 ± 0.05 * |
| Cleavage rate | 0.99 ± 0.008 | 0.99 ± 0.009 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.02 * |
| High-quality embryo rate | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.59 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.41 ± 0.05 * |
Data are mean ± SEM values
* P < 0.05 vs. Non-PCOS without IR. & P < 0.05 vs. Non-PCOS with IR. # P < 0.05 vs. PCOS without IR
Fig. 1Impairment of insulin signaling pathway in granulosa cells from PCOS patients with IR. A, B Aktser473 phosphorylation after insulin stimulation (100 nM for 15 min) in granulosa cells from non-PCOS and PCOS patients with or without IR (n = 6 per group). C Glucose uptake after insulin stimulation (100 nM for 30 min) in granulosa cells from non-PCOS and PCOS patients with or without IR (n = 6 per group). All values are the mean ± SEM. IR, insulin resistance. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared with without insulin stimulation in each group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 compared with non-PCOS without IR with insulin stimulation. & P < 0.05 compared with non-PCOS with IR with insulin stimulation. $ P < 0.05 compared with PCOS without IR with insulin stimulation
Fig. 2Changes of SAA1 abundance in the serum (A), follicular fluid (B) and granulosa cells (C) in non-PCOS and PCOS patients with or without IR (n = 16 per group). All values are the mean ± SEM. FF, follicular fluid. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 compared with non-PCOS without IR. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 compared with non-PCOS with IR. &P < 0.05, & & P < 0.01 compared with PCOS without IR
Fig. 3Expression and production regulation of SAA1 in human granulosa cells. A Immunofluorescence staining of SAA1 (green) in cultured granulosa cells. Nucleus was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm. B, C Effects of IL-1β (1 ng/ml for 24 h) on SAA1 mRNA expression (B) and secretion (C) (n = 4). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared with control (0). D Concentration dependent effect of SAA1 (0, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 μg/ml for 24 h) on SAA1 expression in cultured granulosa cells (n = 4). * P < 0.05 compared with control (0), # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1 (0.01 μg/ml). E Effects of OxpAPC (30 μg/ml), a TLR2/4 inhibitor and JSH-23 (10 μM), a p65 inhibitor on the induction of SAA1 expression by SAA1 (1 μg/ml) per se (n = 3). * P < 0.05 compared with control (0), # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1. All values are the mean ± SEM
Fig. 4Effects of SAA1 on insulin signaling pathway in cultured granulosa cells. A, B Concentration dependent effect of SAA1 (0, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 μg/ml for 24 h) on PTEN expression (n = 4). ** P < 0.01 compared with ctr (0) and # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1 (0.01 μg/ml). C, D Effect of prior treatment with SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 24 h) on Akt phosphorylation induced by insulin (100 nM for 15 min) (n = 4). *** P < 0.001 compared with control-insulin, ## P < 0.01 vs. SAA1-insulin, && P < 0.01 vs. control+insulin. E, F Dose-dependent effect of SAA1 (0, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 μg/ml for 24 h) on total GLUT4 expression (n = 4). G, H Effect of prior treatment with SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 24 h) on GLUT4 translocation (from cytoplasm to membrane) induced by insulin (100 nM for 30 min) (n = 3). * P < 0.05 compared with control. I Effect of prior treatment with SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 24 h) on glucose uptake induced by insulin (100 nM for 30 min) (n = 4). ** P < 0.01 compared with control-insulin, ## P < 0.01 compared with control+insulin. All values are the mean ± SEM
Fig. 5Role of TLR2/4 in SAA1-induced insulin resistance in cultured granulosa cells. A, B Effect of OxpAPC (30 μg/ml), a TLR2/4 inhibitor, on SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 24 h)-induced PTEN protein expression (n = 3). C, D Effect of OxpAPC on SAA1(1 μg/ml for 24 h)-attenuated Akt phosphorylation induced by insulin (100 nM for 15 min)(n = 4). E, F Effect of OxpAPC (30 μg/ml) on SAA1 (1 μg /ml for 24 h) -attenuated GLUT4 translocation induced by insulin (100 nM for 30 min) (n = 4). G Effect of OxpAPC (30 μg/ml) on SAA1 (1 μg /ml for 24 h) -attenuated glucose uptake induced by insulin (100 nM for 30 min) (n = 3). All values are the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 compared with control, # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1
Fig. 6Involvement of p65 in SAA1-induced insulin resistance in cultured granulosa cells. A, B Effect of SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 15, 30, 60 and 180 min) on the phosphorylation of p65 (n = 4). ** P < 0.01 compared with ctr (0), # P < 0.05 compared with 60 min. C, D Effect of OxpAPC (30 μg/ml) on SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 60 min) induced p65 phosphorylation (n = 4). * P < 0.05 compared with control, # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1. E, F Effect of JSH-23 (10 μM), a p65 inhibitor, on SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 24 h) induced PTEN expression (n = 3). * P < 0.05 compared with control, # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1. G, H Effect of JSH-23 (10 μM) on SAA1 (1 μg/ml for 24 h) -attenuated Akt phosphorylation induced by insulin (100 nM for 15 min) (n = 4). * P < 0.05 compared with control, # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1. I, J Effect of JSH-23 (10 μM) on SAA1 (1 μg /ml for 24 h) -attenuated GLUT4 translocation induced by insulin (100 nM for 30 min) (n = 3). ** P < 0.05 compared with control, # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1. K Effect of JSH-23 (10 μM) on SAA1 (1 μg /ml for 24 h) -attenuated glucose uptake induced by insulin (100 nM for 30 min) (n = 4). * P < 0.05 compared with control, # P < 0.05 compared with SAA1. All values are the mean ± SEM