| Literature DB >> 34979951 |
Ambili Narikot1, Varsha Chhotusing Pardeshi1, A M Shubha2, Arpana Iyengar3, Anil Vasudevan4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) cover a spectrum of structural malformations that result from aberrant morphogenesis of kidney and urinary tract. It is the most prevalent cause of kidney failure in children. Hence, it is important from a clinical perspective to unravel the molecular etiology of kidney and urinary tract malformations. Causal variants in genes that direct various stages of development of kidney and urinary tract in fetal life have been identified in 5-20% of CAKUT patients from Western countries. Recent advances in next generation sequencing technology and decreasing cost offer the opportunity to characterize the genetic profile of CAKUT in Indian population and facilitate integration of genetic diagnostics in care of children with CAKUT.Entities:
Keywords: CAKUT; Genetics; Monogenic; Next generation sequencing; Variants
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34979951 PMCID: PMC8722277 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02628-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1Flowchart of the children with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract cohort development
Clinical characteristics of South Indian Children with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract
| Patient Characteristic | Study cohort (n = 110) | Sequenced Cohort (n = 69) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs.) (median;IQR) | 5 (5–9.2) | 6 (4.5–9) | |
| Gender (Male: Female) | 96:14 | 56: 13 | |
| Renal Phenotypes: | |||
| 1. Vesico-Ureteric Reflux (VUR) (Bilateral; Unilateral) | 42 (20:22) (38.18%) | 23(14:9) (33.33%) | 0.52 |
| a. VUR with Hypodysplasia | 26 (23.63%) | 10 (14.49%) | |
| b. VUR without Hypodysplasia | 16 (14.54%) | 13 (18.84%) | |
| 2. Hypodysplastic kidney | 4 (3.63%) | 0 | 0.30 |
| 3. Posterior Urethral Valve (PUV) | 37 (33.63%) | 27 (39.13%) | 0.45 |
| 4. Duplex Collecting System | 4 (3.63%) | 3 (4.34%) | 1.00 |
| 5.Multi-Cystic Dysplastic Kidney (MCDK) | 7 (6.36%) | 5 (7.24%) | 1.00 |
| 6. Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) (Bilateral: Unilateral) | 5 (1:4, 4.54%) | 5 (1:4, 7.24%) | 0.51 |
| 7. Vesicoureteral Junction Obstruction (VUJO) (Bilateral: Unilateral) | 2 (0:2, 1.81%) | 2 (0:2, 2.89%) | 0.64 |
| 8. Renal Agenesis | 7 (6.36%) | 3 (4.34%) | 0.74 |
| 9. Horseshoe Kidney | 1 (0.9%) | 1(1.44%) | 1.00 |
| 10. Ectopic kidney | 1 (0.9%) | 0 | 1.00 |
| Family history | 2 (1.81%) | 0 | |
| Consanguinitya | 27 (24.54%) | 15 (21.73%) | |
| Syndromic | 8(7.27%) | 3 (4.34%) | |
| No of subjects with CKD (≥ stage 2) @ recruitment | 21 (19.09%) | 9 (13.04%) |
aAs reported by parents *chisquare test between diagnostic category in study cohort and sequenced cohort
Fig. 2Schematic visualization of the variant filtration workflow used in this study