| Literature DB >> 34979471 |
Namra Abid1, Aqib Muhammad Khan2, Sara Shujait1, Kainat Chaudhary1, Muhammad Ikram3, Muhammad Imran4, Junaid Haider5, Maaz Khan6, Qasim Khan7, Muhammad Maqbool8.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is one of the emerging fields of the 21st Century. Many new devices and patentable technology is based on nanomaterials (NMs). One of the dominant factors in the use of nanomaterials and their applications in various fields is the synthesis and growth mechanism of nanostructures and nanomaterials. A nanostructured material may have been a good candidate in one application but could be more useful in a different application if synthesized by a different mechanism and technique. Similarly, the structure and morphology of a nanomaterial also depend upon the method of growth and synthesis. For example, it is easy to grow and synthesize amorphous nanostructured thin film using the plasma magnetron sputtering technique, but it may be difficult to obtain a similar structure using the thermal evaporation process due to the nature of the technique itself. In this study, the Top-down and Bottom-up methods and techniques of synthesizing nanostructured materials are reviewed, compared, and analyzed. Both approaches are critically analyzed, and the influencing factors on the synthesis of different nanomaterials, the advantages, and disadvantages of each technique are reported. This review also provides a step-by-step analysis of the choice of method for the synthesis of namomaterials for specific applications.Entities:
Keywords: Bottom-up; Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology; Synthesis; Top-down
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34979471 DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Colloid Interface Sci ISSN: 0001-8686 Impact factor: 12.984