Literature DB >> 3497944

In vitro chloramphenicol susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: disk diffusion procedures and assays for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

G V Doern, G S Daum, T A Tubert.   

Abstract

The activity of chloramphenicol against 100 different strains of Haemophilus influenzae was assessed by a macrotube broth dilution technique and by a standardized disk diffusion method using both enriched chocolate agar (CHOC) and Mueller-Hinton agar containing 1.0% hemoglobin and 1.0% IsoVitaleX (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) supplement (CHOC-MHA). Filter disks containing 30 micrograms of chloramphenicol were used with the disk diffusion procedure. The following zone diameter interpretive criteria were defined: CHOC-MHA, less than or equal to 25 mm = resistant [corrected] and greater than or equal to 26 mm = susceptible [corrected]; CHOC, less than or equal to 28 mm = resistant [corrected] and greater than or equal to 29 mm = susceptible [corrected]. all of the H. influenzae strains examined were also characterized by using two rapid assays for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity: a 1-h tube method (t-CAT) and a 30-min procedure which used commercially available reagent-impregnated disks (d-CAT). The t-CAT procedure was found to be significantly more accurate than the d-CAT procedure as a means for demonstrating production of CAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3497944      PMCID: PMC269246          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1453-1455.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae type b resistant to ampicillin and chloramphenicol.

Authors:  N Uchiyama; G R Greene; D B Kitts; L D Thrupp
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Rapid detection of chloramphenicol resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  P Azemun; T Stull; M Roberts; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Chloramphenicol: A review of its use in clinical practice.

Authors:  H M Feder; C Osier; E G Maderazo
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1981 May-Jun

4.  A permeability barrier as a mechanism of chloramphenicol resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  J L Burns; P M Mendelman; J Levy; T L Stull; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Characterization of chloramphenicol-resistant Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  M C Roberts; C D Swenson; L M Owens; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae type b resistant to both ampicillin and chloramphenicol.

Authors:  J F Kenny; C D Isburg; R H Michaels
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: a collaborative study.

Authors:  G V Doern; J H Jorgensen; C Thornsberry; D A Preston
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.803

  7 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  In vitro susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: review of new National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations.

Authors:  G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid testing of susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to chloramphenicol by a bioluminescence method.

Authors:  C H Park; D L Hixon; L M Berger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Haemophilus influenzae: antibiotic susceptibility.

Authors:  C A Needham
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Chloramphenicol susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  R N Jones; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Laboratory- and species-specific interpretive breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of chloramphenicol susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  G Kronvall; S Ringertz; I Karlsson; E Göransson; K Dornbusch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  G V Doern; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Meningitis due to ampicillin-and chloramphenicol-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b in Canada. Case report and review.

Authors:  A Kabani; A Joffe; G Cadrain; T Jadavji
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1990

8.  Relationship between in vitro susceptibility test results for chloramphenicol and production of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase by Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Aerococcus species.

Authors:  H W Matthews; C N Baker; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  National collaborative study of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  G V Doern; J H Jorgensen; C Thornsberry; D A Preston; T Tubert; J S Redding; L A Maher
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.