Morteza Taghavi Bahreghani1, G Hazale Geraily2, S Haban Alizadeh3, Masoud Najafi4, Alireza Shirazi1. 1. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: gh-geraily@sina.tums.ac.ir. 3. Department of Haematology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Allied Medical Sciences Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most prevalent
malignancy and the fifth major risk for male mortality
worldwide. In 2018, about 1.3 million new cases were
recorded worldwide, which comprised 7.1% of all cancer
cases in men (1-3). In Iran, the pooled age-standardized
incidence rate was 87 per million and it is one of the
ten most cancers (4, 5). Conventional therapy for PrCa
includes surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy,
immune therapy, and radiation therapy (RT). RT is one
of the most effective and common treatment modalities to
treat localized PrCa. However, PrCa is only moderately
responsive or sometimes unresponsive to the cytotoxic
effects of RT (6). Radiation doses are generally limited
to <80 Gy for PrCa, and an increased dose may not show
efficacy for local tumour control. Increasing RT doses
are associated with urinary and bowel adverse effects (7,
8). The results of studies show that radiation resistance
of PrCa may result in the expressions of multiple pivotal
genes that regulate apoptosis, cell proliferation, and cell
cycle pathways (8-11). Hence, a strategy for targeting the
molecular pathways that play a crucial role in radiation
resistance may sensitize PrCa to radiation. This strategy
may lead to decreased RT adverse effects by employing
lower RT doses or at least increase the five-year survival
rate at the current RT dose.Bcl-2 is a member of an anti-apoptotic protein family that regulates
apoptosis in both normal and abnormal cells. It is the second most frequently considered
genetic aberration and is correlated with PrCa resistance to RT (9). Bcl-2 is a pro-survival
protein that has an essential role in PrCa radiation resistance and is correlated with
tumour aggressiveness. The PrCa cell line, LNCaP, overexpresses Bcl-2 (8,
9). Therefore, attempts to inhibit its expression could sensitize this cell line to ionizing
radiation (IR).4′, 5, 7-trihydroxyflavone (apigenin [Api]) is a well-known flavonoid family member and a
natural component of many fruits and vegetables. Api has anti-inflammatory and
anti-carcinogenic effects (12-14). The results of several studies show that the micromolar
concentrations of Api lead to inhibition of viability, apoptosis induction, and suppression
of Bcl-2 expression in the bout androgen-sensitive PrCa cell line. (LNCaP)
and androgen-insensitive PrCa cell lines (PC-3 and DU-145). Api can cause overexpression of
Bax (15-17). Api selectively reduces cell viability and induces apoptosis
in the PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cell lines without affecting normal cells (18). Increased
Bcl-2 expression in PrCa is correlated with radiation resistance;
therefore, Api may have a radiation sensitizer effect on PrCa. The current study is the
first study that aims to investigate the effects of Api on the therapeutic efficacy of
radiation by targeting Bcl-2 and Bax pathway enhanced
radiation-induced apoptosis and assess the ability of Api to sensitize the LNCaP cells to
current or lower radiation doses.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and treatment
In this experimental study, the human PrCa cell lines were obtained from Pasteur
Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran) and subsequently cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco,
Rockville, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Rockville, USA) and 1%
penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were grown in T-75 flasks at 37°C and 5% CO2
. Api (<95% purity, Nanochemia Salamat Company, Karaj, Iran) was dissolved in
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Kiazist Co., Hamedan, Iran) and stored as a 10 mM stock
solution. The stock solution was diluted to the desired concentration directly in the
culture medium. The maximum final concentration of DMSO was 0.1%. We also added 0.1% DMSO
to the control cells and those that only received 2 Gy IR for each of the experiments. The
cells were divided into four groups: untreated (control), 2 Gy ionizing radiation (IR),
Api (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50], and the combination of Api
(IC50 concentration) and 2 Gy IR. For the combination therapy, we added the
IC50 concentration of Api to the cell cultures two hours before irradiation (2 Gy). The
cell cultures were irradiated with one fraction of 2 Gy X-rays at room temperature using a
6 MV LINAC (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) at a 200 cGy/minutes dose rate (gantry angle: 180º,
collimator angle: 0º, field size: 30×30 cm2, SSD: 98 cm, depth: 2 cm). In
order to account for full backscatter, we placed a 5 cm slab phantom on the surface of the
well plate. The Ethical Commitee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.
TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1398.534).
The cells were plated in 96-well plate at a density of 1×104 cells per well in
100 µl of complete culture medium and allowed to attach overnight before the treatments.
The medium was removed 24 hours after plating and replaced by fresh medium that contained
different concentrations (up to 80 µM) of Api in RPMI 1640 medium. We assessed toxicity
and cell viability using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
(MTT) assay (Kiazist Co., Hamedan, Iran) and determined the IC50 dose 24 and 48
hours after treatment with the various concentrations of Api.
Cell viability assessment
The cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1×104 cells per well
and allowed to attach overnight before the treatments. Briefly, at 24 and 48 hours after
treatment, both toxicity and viability of the LNCaP cells were evaluated by the MTT assay
(Kiazist Co., Hamedan, Iran). For the viability assessment, we removed the culture medium
and washed the cells with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Merck Biosciences, Nottingham,
UK). Next, we added 100 µl of complete culture medium that contained 0.5 mg/mL MTT to each
well of the 96-well plates. The plates were incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. Subsequently,
solubilizing solution was added and the plates were incubated in the dark at room
temperature for 30 minutes. Absorbance of the samples was measured by an automatic
microplate reader (BioTek, VT, USA) at 540 nm.
Apoptosis assay
An Annexin V-FITC/PI Assay kit (Merck Biosciences, Nottingham, UK) was used to detect
apoptotic and necrotic cells. The cells were cultured at a density of 2×105
cells per well in a six-well plate. Briefly, at 24 and 48 hours after treatment, the cells
were detached and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 minutes, and subsequently washed twice with
PBS. Diluted Annexin V binding solution was added for a final cell concentration of
1×105 cells/ml and 100 µl of the resultant cell suspension was transferred to
a new tube. Next, we added 5 µl of Annexin conjugated V- fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)
and 5 µl of propidium iodide (PI) to the cell suspensions and incubated them for 15
minutes at room temperature in the dark. Then, 400 µl diluted Annexin V binding solution
was added and the samples were assessed by a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA). FITC
and PI have been exited at 488 nm wavelength. FITC emission and PI were detected at 525 nm
and 650 nm, respectively. Annexin V/PI negative cells indicate healthy cells, whereas
Annexin V positive and PI negative populations represent cells in the early stages of
apoptosis, and Annexin V/PI positive cells are in late apoptosis/secondary necrosis.
Therefore, Annexin V positive cells are the sum of early apoptosis and late
apoptosis/secondary necrosis.
Gene expression
The cells were plated at 2×105 cells per well in six-well plates. Then, RNA
was extracted 24 and 48 hours after treatment with a GeneALL kit (Biotech, Korea) and
StepOne™ thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA). For checking RNA concentration and its
purity, Nanodrop (thermo Fisher, USA) was used. A cDNA Synthesis kit was used to reverse
transcribe 1 µg total RNA to cDNA to check the RNA concentration and its purity. Then,
real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted as follows: one cycle that
activated the Taq polymerase enzyme and separated the two-stranded DNA of the primary
pattern for 5 minutes at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles for 15 seconds at 95°C, 30 seconds at
60°C, and finally 30 seconds at 72°C. SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Biotech, Korea) was used
for the real-time PCR analysis. The Bcl-2 and Bax gene
expressions were normalized to the reference control (Gapdh) gene. The
relative expression ratio (R) of the target gene was calculated based on E and the
crossing point (CP) deviation of an unknown sample versus the control, and was expressed
and compared to the reference gene.List of gene primers
Combination index
The Bliss Independence method was used to calculate the combination index (CI) as an
effect-based strategy. By this method, the effect of combining of two drugs (Eab) was
compared directly with the effects of its individual components (EA and
EB). This model assumes that drugs act individually and do not interfere with
each other. The observed combined effect is represented as a probability
(0
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as mean ± standard error of the
mean (SEM) from at least three different experiments with
four samples per group. Statistical analysis was performed
using the unpaired t test with GraphPad software (version
8, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set
at P<0.05.
Results
Radiation combined with apigenin significantly
reduced cell survival
Figure 1A shows the effect of different concentrations
of Api on the LNCaP cell line after treatment for 24 and
48 hours, and their post-treatment viability according to
the MTT assay. Figure 1A shows that Api inhibited cell
growth in a dose-dependent manner, but was not time-dependent. The 65 μM concentration of Api induced 50%
inhibition of cell growth 24 hours after treatment. Figure
1B shows that the combination of 65 µM Api and 2 Gy
IR caused a significant decrease in viability compared
to the individual treatments with Api and 2 Gy IR. The
combination of Api and radiation also did not appear to
have a time-dependent inhibition of the LNCaP cells.
The CI, which was based on Bliss Independence for co-treatment of LNCaP cells by Api and radiation, was 0.837
at 24 hours and 0.753 at 48 hours.
Fig.1
The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
(MTT) assay was used to assess the effect of apigenin (Api), 2 Gy ionizing
radiation (IR) and their combination on LNCaP cell viability at 24 and 48
hours after treatment. A. Viability of cells treated with Api. B. Viability of
individual API and IR treatments, and their combination. Data are shown
as % of the untreated control group. Mean ± standard error of the mean
(SEM) are obtained from five independent repetitions. **; P<0.01, ***;
P<0.001, ****; P<0.0001 versus the control at 24 hours after treatment,
*; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001, ****; P<0.0001 versus the control at
48 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05 versus Api at 48 hours after treatment,
and h; hours.
The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
(MTT) assay was used to assess the effect of apigenin (Api), 2 Gy ionizing
radiation (IR) and their combination on LNCaP cell viability at 24 and 48
hours after treatment. A. Viability of cells treated with Api. B. Viability of
individual API and IR treatments, and their combination. Data are shown
as % of the untreated control group. Mean ± standard error of the mean
(SEM) are obtained from five independent repetitions. **; P<0.01, ***;
P<0.001, ****; P<0.0001 versus the control at 24 hours after treatment,
*; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001, ****; P<0.0001 versus the control at
48 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05 versus Api at 48 hours after treatment,
and h; hours.
Co-treatment with Api and radiation caused apoptosis
and necrosis
Flow cytometric analysis of LNCaP cells that were
treated with 65 µM Api showed significant increase in
early apoptosis (Fig .2A). Co-treatment of Cells with the combination of 65 µM Api and 2 Gy irradiation showed a
significant increase in late apoptosis/secondary necrosis
compared to cells which treated with API or IR (Fig .2B).
Fig.2
Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of 65 µM Apigenin (Api), 2 Gy ionizing radiation (IR), and
their combination on necrosis and apoptosis induction. A. The percentage
of early apoptosis induction. B. The percentage of late
apoptosis/secondary necrosis induction. C. The percentage of the
combination of early apoptosis and late apoptosis/secondary necrosis cell fractions.
D. Apoptosis dot-plot 24 hours after treatment. E.
Apoptosis dot-plot 48 hours after treatment. Data are shown as % of the untreated
control group. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) are obtained from three
independent repetitions. **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001 versus the control 24
hours after treatment. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001,
****;P<0.0001 versus the control 48 hours after treatment, ##; P<0.01
versus Api 24 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05, versus Api 48 hours after
treatment, PI; propidium iodide, h; Hours, and Con; Control.
Figure 2C shows that at 24 hours after co-treatment
of the cells with Api and IR, the difference between the
combined early apoptosis and late apoptosis/secondary
necrosis cell fraction (Annexin v+) (51.9%) was not
significant compared to those treated with Api alone
(41.52%). However, 48 hours after co-treatment cells with
Api and IR the combination of early apoptosis and late
apoptosis/secondary necrosis cells fraction (Annexin v+)
(58.9%) is significantly more than cells just treated with
Api (45.9%).Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of 65 µM Apigenin (Api), 2 Gy ionizing radiation (IR), and
their combination on necrosis and apoptosis induction. A. The percentage
of early apoptosis induction. B. The percentage of late
apoptosis/secondary necrosis induction. C. The percentage of the
combination of early apoptosis and late apoptosis/secondary necrosis cell fractions.
D. Apoptosis dot-plot 24 hours after treatment. E.
Apoptosis dot-plot 48 hours after treatment. Data are shown as % of the untreated
control group. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) are obtained from three
independent repetitions. **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001 versus the control 24
hours after treatment. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001,
****;P<0.0001 versus the control 48 hours after treatment, ##; P<0.01
versus Api 24 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05, versus Api 48 hours after
treatment, PI; propidium iodide, h; Hours, and Con; Control.
Bax gene up-regulation and inhibition of Bcl-2
gene expression
Real-time PCR analysis of LNCaP cells treated with 65 µM Api showed a significant
increase in Bax gene expression (Fig .3A) and a decrease in
Bcl-2 gene expression (Fig .3B). Consequently, the
Bax/Bcl-2 ratio favoured apoptosis (Fig .3C). The effect of Api on
expressions of these genes was not time-dependent. However, the Bax/
Bcl-2 ratio significantly increased over time. Next, we investigated the
Bax and Bcl-2 gene expressions 24 and 48 hours after
combined treatment of the cells with Api and IR. Figure 3A, B show that the Bax
and Bcl-2 gene expressions 24 hours after co-treatment of the
LNCaP cells with Api and IR was not significantly different compared to those treated with
Api alone. However, 48 hours after co-treatment with Api and IR, there was a significant
increase in Bax gene expression and a significant decrease in
Bcl-2 gene expression compared to cells treated with either Api or IR.
Figure 3C shows a significant change in the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio after the
combination therapy that favoured apoptosis.
Fig.3
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assessment of the effects of Apigenin (Api), ionizing
radiation (IR), and their combination on Bax and
Bcl-2 gene expressions, and changes in the
Bax/Bcl-2 ratio at 24 and 48 hours after treatment. A.
Bax fold-change. B. Bcl-2
fold-change. C. Bax/Bcl-2 ratio change. Data are shown
as % of the untreated control group. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) obtained
from three independent repetitions.*; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ****;
P<0.0001 versus the control 24 hours after treatment, **; P<0.01, ***;
P<0.001 versus the control 48 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05 versus
Api 24 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05, ##; P<0.01 versus Api 48 hours
after treatment, Con; Control, and h; Hours.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assessment of the effects of Apigenin (Api), ionizing
radiation (IR), and their combination on Bax and
Bcl-2 gene expressions, and changes in the
Bax/Bcl-2 ratio at 24 and 48 hours after treatment. A.
Bax fold-change. B. Bcl-2
fold-change. C. Bax/Bcl-2 ratio change. Data are shown
as % of the untreated control group. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) obtained
from three independent repetitions.*; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ****;
P<0.0001 versus the control 24 hours after treatment, **; P<0.01, ***;
P<0.001 versus the control 48 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05 versus
Api 24 hours after treatment, #; P<0.05, ##; P<0.01 versus Api 48 hours
after treatment, Con; Control, and h; Hours.
Discussion
In this study, Api reduced the viability of PrCa cells. Api reduced the viability of LNCaP
cells in µM concentration. The IC50 concentration of Api for LNCaP cells is 65
µM. Treatment of PrCa by 2 Gy IR and 65 µM of Api showed that, at 24 hours, the CI of this
treatment based on the Bliss Independence method was 0.85 and it was 0.72 after 48 hours.
Previous study proposed that a CI between 0.85-1.05 could not be considered to show any
synergistic effects for combination therapy (19). Our findings indicated that 24 hours after
co-treatment of LNCaP with Api and radiation, no significant changes in the viability of
cells was observed in comparison to those treated with Api alone. However, 48 hours after
co-treatment of PrCa with Api and radiation showed a significant decrease in PrCa cell
viability compared to Api or radiation alone.Co-treatment of LNCaP cells with Api and IR led to a
change in the apoptotic pattern compared to cells treated
by Api alone. The cells co-treated with Api and IR had
a higher percentage of late apoptosis/secondary necrosis,
whereas cells treated by Api alone had a higher percentage
of early apoptosis. The apoptosis/necrosis pattern for cells
that treated with only IR was similar to the cells co-treated
with Api and IR.At 24 hours after co-treatment of the cells with Api and
IR, we noted that the difference between the combination
of early apoptosis and late apoptosis/secondary necrosis
cell fraction with those treated by Api alone was not
significant despite the significant difference between their
apoptosis/necrosis pattern. However, flow cytometry
analysis of Annexin V-FITC 48 hours after co-treatment
with Api and IR showed that the combination of the early
apoptosis and late apoptosis/secondary necrosis cell
fractions was significantly more than those treated with
Api alone, which was in agreement with our findings from
the MTT assay.We evaluated Bcl-2 gene expression, as a critical inhibitor of apoptosis,
following irradiation and treatment with Api. Bcl-2 is an upstream effector
gene in the apoptotic pathway and that is a potent suppressor of apoptosis (18).
Bcl-2 has been shown to form a heterodimer with the pro-apoptotic
Bax and might neutralize its pro-apoptotic effects. The ratio of
Bax/Bcl-2 is a crucial factor that plays an essential role in determining
whether cells undergo apoptosis or not. Bcl-2 is the second most frequent
genetic aberration that has a correlation with radiation resistance in PrCa. LNCaP cells
have high expression of Bcl-2 (7). Since Bcl-2 plays a
crucial role in apoptosis, we studied the time-dependent effects of Api on its expression
level in LNCaP cells alone or combined with radiation. We observed that Api significantly
inhibited Bcl-2 gene expression and up-regulated Bax gene
expression. The expressions of these genes was not as time-dependent as the results of the
MTT and fluorescence tests. Co-treatment of LNCaP cells with both Api and IR showed that was
a significant suppression of Bcl-2 gene expression and up-regulation of
Bax gene expression compared to cells that treated individually by Api or
IR 48 hours after combination therapy. However, at 24 hours after combination therapy, we
observed no significant change in gene expressions compared to cells that were treated with
Api.The decrease in Bcl-2 protein levels and increase in Bax protein levels enhanced radiation
sensitivity and increased apoptosis induction. The combination therapy of Api and radiation
increased Bax gene expression compared to treatment with Api or radiation
alone. One of the limitations of this study is that the protein levels of Bcl-2 and Bax were
not measured. However, the results of gene expression were consistent with the enhancement
of apoptosis induction, and it could be concluded that this co-treatment, by increasing the
protein levels of Bax and decreasing Bcl-2 protein levels, most likely enhanced
radiation-induced apoptosis and sensitized PrCa to radiation. Thus, this strategy might lead
to a decrease in adverse effects caused by RT by employing lower doses of radiation or at
least increasing the five-year survival rate at the current dose. Of note, based on the
daily dietary intake of flavonoids, the concentrations used in this study are
physiologically achievable and not toxic in humans (20). More in vitro
studies, including a study on an androgen-insensitive PrCa cell line (PC-3 or DU-145) and an
investigation of the clonogenic formation ability of PrCa after co-treatment with Api, in
addition to an in vivo study would be needed to confirm the radiosensitisation effect of Api
on PrCa.
Conclusion
Here, we successfully demonstrated that co-treatment of LNCaP cells with Api and IR
significantly increased the Bax/Bcl-2 gene expression ratio in favour of
apoptosis. Api could potentiate radiation-induced apoptosis and cause a decrease in LNCaP
cell viability. Api and IR have a synergic effect, and Api is a potent radiosensitiser of
LNCaP cells.
Authors: Colm Morrissey; Amanda O'Neill; Barbara Spengler; Volker Christoffel; John M Fitzpatrick; R William G Watson Journal: Prostate Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702