Literature DB >> 34978692

3D-on-2D: A Physiologically Relevant and Gel-Free In Vitro Coculture Method to Assay Antimetastatic Agents.

Abhinav Dey1, Samuel Eisenberg2, Rayna Birnbaum2, David J Sharp3,4.   

Abstract

Metastasis of cancer cells leads to 90% of lethality among cancer patients. A crucial step in the hematogenous spread of metastatic cancer is the detachment of cells from the primary tumor followed by invasion through nearby blood vessels (Wong and Hynes. Cell Cycle 5(8):812-817, 2006). This is common to several solid tumors, including medulloblastoma (Van Ommeren et al. Brain Pathol 30:691-702, 2020). Because invasion is a crucial step in metastasis, the development of assays studying invasion are important for identifying antimetastatic drugs. There is always a need to develop better 3D in vitro models that not only mimic the complexity of in vivo architecture of solid tumors and their microenvironment, but are also simple to execute in medium to high throughput. We developed an in vitro coculture invasion assay that relies on the binary interaction between cancer cells and endothelial cells for research on tumor invasion and antimetastatic drug discovery. The goal of the current protocol is to use the simplicity of a two-dimensional endothelial cell culture to create a gel-free physiological substratum that can facilitate cancer cell invasion from a 3D cancer spheroid. This provides a simple and reproducible biomimetic 3D cell-based system for the analysis of invasion capacity in large populations of tumor spheroids. Using this assay, we can compare the effect of invasion inhibitors/activators on cancer spheroids. The results are analyzed by manual scoring of images for the presence or absence of sprouting from cancer spheroids. This enables simple and fast analysis of metastasis, which facilitates multiparameter examination.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D culture model; 3D multicellular objects; Cancer Research; Collective invasion; Endothelial cells; Image analysis; Invasion assay; Spheroid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34978692     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1952-0_10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lymphatic or hematogenous dissemination: how does a metastatic tumor cell decide?

Authors:  Sunny Y Wong; Richard O Hynes
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells offer new insights into the relationship between lipid metabolism and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Park; Yali Zhang; Serban P Georgescu; Kristin L Johnson; Dequon Kong; Jonas B Galper
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Tumor-endothelial cell interactions: therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Megumi Iiizumi; Sonia Mohinta; Sucharita Bandyopadhyay; Kounosuke Watabe
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.514

Review 4.  The molecular biology of medulloblastoma metastasis.

Authors:  Randy Van Ommeren; Livia Garzia; Borja L Holgado; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 6.508

Review 5.  In vitro cell migration and invasion assays.

Authors:  Nina Kramer; Angelika Walzl; Christine Unger; Margit Rosner; Georg Krupitza; Markus Hengstschläger; Helmut Dolznig
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Cancer metastasis: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Chao-Nan Qian; Yan Mei; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.