| Literature DB >> 34977830 |
Mark S Pearson1, Bemnet A Tedla1, Gebeyaw G Mekonnen1, Carla Proietti1, Luke Becker1, Rie Nakajima2, Al Jasinskas2, Denise L Doolan1, Abena S Amoah3, Stefanie Knopp4,5,6, David Rollinson5, Said M Ali7, Fatma Kabole8, Cornelis H Hokke3, Akim A Adegnika3,9,10,11, Matt A Field1,12, Govert van Dam3, Paul L A M Corstjens13, Takafira Mduluza14,15, Francisca Mutapi13,15,16, Claude Oeuvray17, Beatrice Greco17, Sujittra Chaiyadet18, Thewarach Laha19, Pengfei Cai20, Donald P McManus20, Maria Elena Bottazzi21, Philip L Felgner2, Javier Sotillo1,22, Alex Loukas1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sensitive diagnostics are needed for effective management and surveillance of schistosomiasis so that current transmission interruption goals set by WHO can be achieved. We aimed to screen the Schistosoma haematobium secretome to find antibody biomarkers of schistosome infection, validate their diagnostic performance in samples from endemic populations, and evaluate their utility as point of care immunochromatographic tests (POC-ICTs) to diagnose urogenital schistosomiasis in the field.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34977830 PMCID: PMC8683377 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00150-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Microbe ISSN: 2666-5247
Figure 1Schematic overview of the study
We used an integrated approach to identify biomarkers of S haematobium infection. (A) Diagnostic antigens were selected using an immunomics approach to select antigens that were targets of significantly elevated infection-associated IgG responses. (B) Eight antigens were selected for further assessment. (C) Diagnostic performance of five recombinant antigens expressed in Escherichia coli was validated by ELISA. (D) The two highest performing antigens were each incorporated into a separate POC-ICT and their diagnostic performance further assessed. POC-ICT=point of care immunochromatographic test. OD=optical density. *Redundancy between the two antigen groups means that the starting number of antigens does not equal the sum total of the two individual datasets. †Feature selection for the S haematobium protein array was informed by S haematobium proteomic16, 17 and Schistosoma mansoni bioinformatic datasets. ‡S haematobium extracellular vesicle proteomic data described by Mekonnen and colleagues.
Figure 2Serum and urine IgG responses resulting from probing of Schistosoma haematobium protein arrays
Volcano plot showing fold change and significance of IgG responses between infected (S haematobium-endemic) and non-infected populations with serum (A) or urine (B). Each individual spot denotes a single arrayed antigen. Coloured lines represent different probability thresholds (blue p<0·05; red p<0·01; grey p<0·001). Scatterplot showing correlation of serum and urine IgG responses for all samples (serum n=242; urine n=117; C) and matched serum and urine samples (n=17; D). SI=signal intensity.
Figure 3IgG antibody responses to Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant versions of the most sensitive and specific proteins and Schistosoma haematobium-soluble egg antigen in serum samples from S haematobium-endemic populations
Anti-MS3_10385 (A), anti-MS3_10186 (B), anti-MS3_09198 (C), anti-MS3_01370 (D), anti-Sh-TSP-2 (E), and anti-S haematobium-soluble egg antigen (F). Individuals who were egg-positive were characterised (WHO stratification) as either having a high (≥50 eggs per 10 mL urine) or low (1–49 eggs per 10 mL urine) intensity infection. Egg− and CAA+ indicates egg-negative individuals who were classified as positive (infected) by the more sensitive CAA detection test. Egg− and CAA− indicates egg-negative individuals who were confirmed as antigen-negative by the CAA detection test. Plotted data represent the responses of both the Zimbabwe (black symbols) and Gabon (blue symbols) cohorts. Reactivity cutoffs were determined as the mean plus three SDs of the values of the non-endemic negative group (red dotted line). Significance was analysed by Student's t test. Frequency of recognition patterns were established with serum samples from individuals who were infected resident in S haematobium-endemic populations (G). Samples are sorted from left to right by decreasing egg burden. To facilitate proper comparison, the dataset has been trimmed to exclude any samples not assayed for all five recombinant antigens and S haematobium-soluble egg antigen (n=175). CAA=circulating anodic antigen. OD=optical density. *p≤0·05. †p≤0·01. ‡p≤0·001. §p≤0·0001.
Figure 4IgG antibody responses to Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant versions of the most sensitive and specific proteins and Schistosoma haematobium-soluble egg antigen in urine from S haematobium-endemic populations
Anti-MS3_10385 (A), anti-MS3_10186 (B), anti-MS3_09198 (C), anti-MS3_01370 (D), anti-Sh-TSP-2 (E), and anti-S haematobium-soluble egg antigen (F). See figure 3 legend for details. Plotted data represent the responses of both the Zimbabwe (black symbols) and Zanzibar (red symbols) cohorts. Reactivity cutoffs were determined as the mean plus three SDs of the values of the non-endemic negative group (red dotted line). Significance was analysed by Student's t test. Frequency of recognition patterns were established using urine from individuals who were infected resident in S haematobium-endemic populations (G). Samples have been sorted from left to right by decreasing egg burden. To facilitate proper comparison, the dataset has been trimmed to exclude any samples not assayed for all five recombinant antigens and S haematobium-soluble egg antigen (n=148). OD=optical density. *p≤0·05. †p≤0·01. ‡p≤0·001. §p≤0·0001.
Figure 5Pilot development of a point of care immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of urogenital schistosomiasis using serum
(A) Representative tests showing positive results of differing band intensities. (B) Schematic showing positive (red boxes) and negative (white boxes) results for MS3_01370 or Sh-TSP-2 immunochromatographic test using ELISA-validated serum samples from the Gabon cohort (high, n=10; low, n=22; egg− and CAA+, n=4; egg− and CAA−, n=14; non-endemic, n=10). Strips were coated with either MS3_01370 or Sh-TSP-2 at the test line to facilitate capture and detection of anti-MS3_01370 or anti-Sh-TSP-2 IgG in serum added to the sample reservoir. Appearance of a band at the test and control lines was considered a positive result and a band at the control line only was considered a negative result. Test bands were given a score from least (+1) to most (+4) intense and a score of 0 was given to a negative result. Two independent readers had to agree on a test result. Every test performed was valid, as confirmed by the appearance of a band at the control line. Samples have been sorted from left to right by decreasing egg burden.