Rong Zhang1, Dedong Li2, Kun Xu2, Chenxi Yang2, Tingrong Luo1, Xin Zhao2, George F Gao2. 1. Laboratory of Animal Infectious Diseases, College of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Guangxi University, Nanning, China. 2. CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination provides good protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19; however, the waning of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in fully vaccinated individuals has been reported mostly 6 months after the last vaccine dose.1, 2, 3 A booster vaccination (third dose of vaccine) has been proposed and initiated in many countries; and a prime-boost sequential immunisation approach is thought to be beneficial.We designed a prime-boost experiment of the inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) and receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based tandem-repeat dimeric protein subunit vaccine ZF2001 (Zhifei Longcom) in mice (appendix p 6).First, we assessed five groups: BBIBP-CorV-ZF2001 (one dose BBIBP-CorV followed by one dose ZF2001), ZF2001-BBIBP-CorV group (one dose ZF2001 followed by one dose BBIBP-CorV), ZF2001-ZF2001 (one dose ZF2001 followed by second dose ZF2001), BBIBP-CorV-BBIBP-CorV (one dose BBIBP-CorV followed by second dose BBIBP-CorV), and a placebo group. The highest geometric mean titre (GMT) of neutralising antibodies was 14 469 in the BBIBP-CorV-ZF2001 group, which was 14·5 times that of the GMT of neutralising antibodies in the ZF2001-BBIBP-CorV group, and more than four times that of the GMT of neutralising antibodies in the ZF2001-ZF2001 and BBIBP-CorV-BBIBP-CorV groups. Moreover, the BBIBP-CorV-ZF2001 group elicited the highest GMT of neutralising antibodies against all SARS-CoV-2 variants in this study (appendix pp 4–9).At the time of writing, more than half of the Chinese population have received two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.Second, we investigated the booster efficacy of ZF2001, assessing four groups: BBIBP-BBIBP-ZF2001 group (two doses of BBIBP-CorV, followed by one dose [booster] ZF2001), BBIBP-BBIBP-BBIBP group (two doses of BBIBP-CorV, followed by third dose [booster] BBIBP-CorV), BBIBP-BBIBP group (two doses of BBIP-CorV and no booster), and a placebo group. The BBIBP-BBIBP-ZF2001 group (appendix pp 6 and 10) showed the highest level of RBD-specific IgG, spike protein-specific IgG, and neutralising antibodies; the GMT of neutralising antibodies was 21 375, which was 3·4 times more than in the BBIBP-BBIBP-BBIBP group. The BBIBP-BBIBP-ZF2001 group also kept a consistent neutralisation against the SARS-CoV-2 variants, including kappa (B.1.617.1) and lambda (C.37), and the GMT of neutralising antibodies were higher than in any other groups (appendix p 6; −1·2 to 1·2 fold change compared with prototype, p>0·05). In addition, using ZF2001 as a booster in the BBIBP-BBIBP-ZF2001 group provided a high level of GMT of neutralising antibodies (18 667) against SARS-CoV-2 delta variant (B.1.617.2); four times (4633) that of the GMTs in the BBIBP-BBIBP-BBIBP group and 14·6 times (1279) that of the GMTs in the BBIBP-BBIBP group. The BBIP-BBIP-ZF2001 group still had a GMT of neutralising antibodies of 18 635 against the most immune-escape variant of concern, beta (B.1.351), which is 8·6 times that of the BBIBP-BBIBP-BBIBP group (2157). Using ZF2001 as a booster vaccine elicits higher antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 wild type and SARS-CoV-2 variants in this study (appendix pp 4–10).Compared with the BBIBP-CorV (inactivated vaccine), ZF2001 elicits a more focused antibody production by using SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD dimer as the antigen. Using two doses of BBIBP-CorV vaccine to prime and ZF2001 as a booster vaccine, the B cells producing RBD-specific antibodies—which takes up most of the neutralising antibodies—will be further activated. Based on evidence that ZF2001 as a booster vaccine following two inactivated vaccines could increase the neutralising antibody titre, especially for variants including delta, a heterologous booster vaccine using ZF2001 could be considered for the future immunisation programme.This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/microbe on January 7, 2022
Authors: Matthew McCallum; Anna De Marco; Florian A Lempp; M Alejandra Tortorici; Dora Pinto; Alexandra C Walls; Martina Beltramello; Alex Chen; Zhuoming Liu; Fabrizia Zatta; Samantha Zepeda; Julia di Iulio; John E Bowen; Martin Montiel-Ruiz; Jiayi Zhou; Laura E Rosen; Siro Bianchi; Barbara Guarino; Chiara Silacci Fregni; Rana Abdelnabi; Shi-Yan Caroline Foo; Paul W Rothlauf; Louis-Marie Bloyet; Fabio Benigni; Elisabetta Cameroni; Johan Neyts; Agostino Riva; Gyorgy Snell; Amalio Telenti; Sean P J Whelan; Herbert W Virgin; Davide Corti; Matteo Samuele Pizzuto; David Veesler Journal: Cell Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 41.582