Literature DB >> 34977762

Commentary: Evolution toward a "bespoke" Ross procedure.

William Kent1, R Scott McClure1, Paul W M Fedak1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34977762      PMCID: PMC8691221          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JTCVS Tech        ISSN: 2666-2507


× No keyword cloud information.
External ring annuloplasty. Novel technical advances that stabilize the autograft for the Ross procedure may extend candidacy to include patients with primary aortic regurgitation and improve durability. See Article page 383. With accumulating evidence of low perioperative mortality, favorable hemodynamics, low risk of endocarditis, long-term durability, and most importantly, a survival advantage over prosthetic valve replacement, the living pulmonary autograft is an ideal aortic valve replacement option for active young and middle-aged adult patients. With long-term survival equal to the age- and sex-matched general population in most series, the arguments that favor use of the Ross procedure have become increasingly compelling., Younger patients may derive the greatest long-term benefit from the Ross procedure. Yet, these selected patients often have congenital bicuspid valves, with pure aortic regurgitation (AR) and a dilated aortic valve annulus. Historical data from older Ross clinical studies show that patients with primary AR are found to be at risk for reoperation due to autograft dilation with recurrent regurgitation. This has restricted use of the Ross procedure in many patients who may benefit. Fortunately, with recent technical and perioperative care pathway innovations, the benefit for these young adults with AR may be equal to, if not greater, than older patients with aortic stenosis. In this issue, Mazine and El-Hamamsy provide an excellent overview of Ross procedure outcomes, highlighting the concerns of progressive annular dilation in patients with AR. With a thoughtful unpacking of the contributing mechanisms, this expert team offers a successful approach to address these earlier technical shortcomings. The key elements of success are use of a tailored surgical approach to stabilize the autograft in addition to strict postoperative blood pressure control. The concept of a “bespoke” Ross operation is appealing on several levels. Unlike full external support techniques with the native root inclusion technique or encasement of the autograft in a Dacron tube, the “nonwrapped” approach maintains the dynamic motion of the autograft root and optimizes hemodynamics. It is recognized that recurrent AR can result from progressive dilation of the native ascending aorta, and the autograft, at the sinotubular junction (STJ). To address this, a Dacron annuloplasty at the STJ, in patients with a dilated ascending aorta, acts to prevent dilation and AR by mitigating displacement of the autograft's commissures. More proximally, an extra-aortic ring annuloplasty is used to prevent proximal dilation at the level of the ventriculoaortic junction (annulus). The value of an STJ annuloplasty and the effectiveness of an external ring annuloplasty, rather than subcommissural annuloplasty stitches, which are known to fail, are lessons learned through experience with aortic valve repair. These technical nuances are transferrable from aortic valve repair techniques and are a valuable component of the contemporary Ross procedure. It is reasonable to assume, based on emerging evidence, that these modifications will translate into better long-term durability of the pulmonary autograft. This adds important technical detail and support for the Ross procedure as an excellent option for young and middle-aged patients, including those with AR who are not amenable to repair.
  4 in total

1.  Improved Survival After the Ross Procedure Compared With Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Edward Buratto; William Y Shi; Rochelle Wynne; Chin L Poh; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; John Goldblatt; James Tatoulis; Peter D Skillington
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Ross Procedure in Adults for Cardiologists and Cardiac Surgeons: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Subodh Verma; Mark D Peterson; Robert O Bonow; Magdi H Yacoub; Tirone E David; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure.

Authors:  Anas Aboud; Efstratios I Charitos; Buntaro Fujita; Ulrich Stierle; Jan-Christian Reil; Vladimir Voth; Markus Liebrich; Martin Andreas; Tomas Holubec; Constanze Bening; Marc Albert; Petr Fila; Jiri Ondrasek; Peter Murin; Rüdiger Lange; Hermann Reichenspurner; Ulrich Franke; Armin Gorski; Anton Moritz; Günther Laufer; Wolfgang Hemmer; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Stephan Ensminger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Munir Boodhwani; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.