C Redondo-Obispo1, P Serafini2, E Climent-Pascual3, T S Ripolles4, I Mora-Seró2, A de Andrés1, C Coya4. 1. Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, C/Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain. 2. Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló, Spain. 3. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain. 4. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/Tulipán s/n, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
The relatively low stability of solar cells based on hybrid halide perovskites is the main issue to be solved for the implementation in real life of these extraordinary materials. Degradation is accelerated by temperature, moisture, oxygen, and light and mediated by halide easy hopping. The approach here is to incorporate pristine graphene, which is hydrophobic and impermeable to gases and likely limits ionic diffusion while maintaining adequate electronic conductivity. Low concentrations of few-layer graphene platelets (up to 24 × 10-3 wt %) were incorporated to MAPbI3 films for a detailed structural, optical, and transport study whose results are then used to fabricate solar cells with graphene-doped active layers. The lowest graphene content delays the degradation of films with time and light irradiation and leads to enhanced photovoltaic performance and stability of the solar cells, with relative improvement over devices without graphene of 15% in the power conversion efficiency, PCE. A higher graphene content further stabilizes the perovskite films but is detrimental for in-operation devices. A trade-off between the possible sealing effect of the perovskite grains by graphene, that limits ionic diffusion, and the reduction of the crystalline domain size that reduces electronic transport, and, especially, the detected increase of film porosity, that facilitates the access to atmospheric gases, is proposed to be at the origin of the observed trends. This work demonstrated how the synergy between these materials can help to develop cost-effective routes to overcome the stability barrier of metal halide perovskites, introducing active layer design strategies that allow commercialization to take off.
The relatively low stability of solar cells based on hybrid halide perovskites is the main issue to be solved for the implementation in real life of these extraordinary materials. Degradation is accelerated by temperature, moisture, oxygen, and light and mediated by halide easy hopping. The approach here is to incorporate pristine graphene, which is hydrophobic and impermeable to gases and likely limits ionic diffusion while maintaining adequate electronic conductivity. Low concentrations of few-layer graphene platelets (up to 24 × 10-3 wt %) were incorporated to MAPbI3 films for a detailed structural, optical, and transport study whose results are then used to fabricate solar cells with graphene-doped active layers. The lowest graphene content delays the degradation of films with time and light irradiation and leads to enhanced photovoltaic performance and stability of the solar cells, with relative improvement over devices without graphene of 15% in the power conversion efficiency, PCE. A higher graphene content further stabilizes the perovskite films but is detrimental for in-operation devices. A trade-off between the possible sealing effect of the perovskite grains by graphene, that limits ionic diffusion, and the reduction of the crystalline domain size that reduces electronic transport, and, especially, the detected increase of film porosity, that facilitates the access to atmospheric gases, is proposed to be at the origin of the observed trends. This work demonstrated how the synergy between these materials can help to develop cost-effective routes to overcome the stability barrier of metal halide perovskites, introducing active layer design strategies that allow commercialization to take off.
The
goal of lowering solar electricity costs by improving the efficiency,
reliability, and durability of emerging metal halide perovskite (MHP)
solar cells (PSCs) is actually an intense area of research. Three-dimensional
(3D) MHPs are described by the general formula ABX3, where
A, B, and X are a monovalent cation (MA: CH3NH3+, FA: NH2CH = NH2+,
and Cs+), a divalent metal cation (mainly Pb2+), and a halide anion (Br–, Cl–, or I–), respectively.[1] PSCs have already demonstrated outstanding power conversion efficiencies
(PCEs), reaching a certified 25.5% efficiency[2] of photovoltaic devices for 3D Pb-based perovskites in record time.
In just 1 decade, PSCs have surpassed CIGS and CdTe-based solar cells
but using low-temperature and cost-effective methods as solution processing,
revolutionizing existing technologies with simple layered-structure
devices.[1] MHPs exhibit high absorption
coefficients[3] and sharp absorption edges,[4] long charge carrier diffusion length,[5] low exciton binding energy,[6] and tunable band gap in the ideal range for silicon-based
tandem devices (1.5–1.8 eV).[7] However,
despite this potential, significant efforts are still needed to overcome
various technological challenges, such as very high instability under
environmental conditions. Moisture, air, UV light, thermal stress
(heat), light soaking, and electric fields, among other agents, degrade
the perovskite solar cells,[8,9] especially outdoors,[10] and prevent market requirements from being achieved.
MHP rapidly evolves to PbI2 or PbO in the presence of moisture or light irradiation.[11−13] Even in an inert atmosphere, the most representative perovskite
absorber material, MAPbI3, appears to be thermally unstable
as revealed by the observed transformation into PbI2.[14] Stability is therefore one of the main barriers
preventing the widespread application of PSCs.[15,16]Most of the advances in the performance of PSCs have resulted
from
improvements in device architecture and material composition. The
excellent properties that MHPs provide on the one hand, and those
of graphene (G) on the other, can envision great enhancement of device
properties. The hydrophobic character of G[17] could enhance stability and passivation of traps at the crystalline
domain interfaces, or better energy level alignment[18] could improve charge injection/extraction that could lead
to more efficient devices. In fact, the incorporation of graphene-related
materials (GRMs) in PSC devices has been demonstrated to be a promising
route toward applications and improvements in performance and stability
and, very importantly, for their commercial launch.[19−22] It has been observed that covering
a two-dimensional (2D) perovskite with a graphene monolayer maintained
reasonable optical properties after exposure to high temperature and
humidity.[23] Note that pristine graphene
(sp2 C) and functionalized graphene [such as graphene oxide
(GO), reduced GO (rGO), G quantum dots (GQDs), and other derivatives
further functionalized] have different properties and behaviors related
to the presence of oxygen (or other) functional groups.The
literature describes how GO or rGO is used to dope or substitute
the hole transport layer (HTL) and the use of G, GQDs, Li-GO, and
rGO in the electron transport layer (ETL), with a positive effect
on both charge extraction rates and stability of PSCs. However, the
combination/incorporation of GRM into the active layer is less frequent
and extremely scarce are the works that incorporate pristine graphene.
Morphology, grain size, and thickness are critical factors in the
charge dynamics and the final performance of the device that can be
modified by the use of this GRM. Among them, carbon nanotubes have
been used as additives in the perovskite active layer as electron
donors or acceptors to reduce charge recombination, acting as a nucleation
template.[24] Nitrogen-doped rGO, N-rGO,
has been added to obtain bigger crystal domains to passivate the surface
and to delay the recombination of charges.[25,26] Eventually amine-functionalized-G[27] and
GQDs[28,29] have been added to improve charge-extraction
efficiency and facilitate charge transport. Chen et al.[30] simultaneously incorporated N, S codoped GQDs
in the ETL-perovskite interface and into the perovskite active layer
of the PSC acting as a nucleating template, easing charge extraction
and defect passivation, obtaining efficiency and stability improvements
of the device. Also, electrospun graphene nanofibers[31] added into the perovskite improved nucleation and crystallization
at the nanofiber interface, favoring charge transport and resulting
in improved photovoltaic performance and stability of the final device.
Recently, Lou et al.[32] used a graphene/halogenated-polymer
composite dispersion as an antisolvent in the perovskite synthesis,
observing that halogen elements (Cl/F) in the polymer can p-dope the
graphene and endow it with higher hole-transport selectivity. However,
it should be noted that, to our knowledge, the effect of only pristine
graphene platelets on the active perovskite layer has not been investigated
and until now they have been hardly used in the charge-transport layers.
Wang et al.[33] and Agresti et al.[34] tested nanocomposites of G and TiO2 nanoparticles and doped the mesoporous TiO2 layer with
graphene flakes, respectively, and reported charge-carrier injection
and collection improvements and cell stability. Recently, we have
demonstrated a route for doping poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–poly(styrenesulfonate)
(PEDOT:PSS) HTL with pristine G-nanoplatelets, obtaining significant
improvement on conductivity without the loss of transmittance at concentrations
well below percolation.[35] The integration
of this G-doped HTL into inverted MAPbI3 solar cells resulted
in more efficient devices due to an enhancement of charge extraction
and a reduction of charge accumulation at the graphene–PEDOT:PSS
interface as well as stability improvement under environmental conditions.Here, we act on the hybrid lead iodide perovskite active layer,
searching to exploit the synergy between these different materials.
Specifically, the most commonly used hybrid halide perovskite, MAPbI3, is combined with pristine graphene platelets into the active
layers of the solar cells. For the appropriate amount of graphene
(only 0.6 × 10–3 wt %), a significant improvement
of 15% for the average efficiency value and increased stability is
demonstrated in non encapsulated devices under high-stress conditions.
Impedance spectroscopy reveals that graphene induced an enhancement
in recombination resistance, Rrec. These
results are explained in terms of the modifications induced by graphene
in the analyzed structural, morphological, optical, and electronic
properties of the G-MAPbI3 thin films. This work demonstrates
a simple route to obtain graphene/metal halide composites that can
pave the way to the development of low-cost solar cells.
Results and Discussion
Structural and Morphological
Characterization
The used graphene platelets correspond to
few-layer graphene with
defects mainly related to the domain size according to its Raman spectrum
(Figure S1, Experimental Section in the Supporting Information). The narrow widths of G and 2D peaks reveal the
superior quality of this graphene[36] compared
to that of GO and rGO materials. For fundamental characterization,
MAPbI3 thin films on glass substrates were obtained with
different graphene contents in the precursor solution (see the Experimental
Section of the Supporting Information).
The samples are named as 0G (reference sample without graphene), 2.5G,
5G, 10G, 50G, and 100G, corresponding to 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 50, and 100
mg/L of G in the precursor solutions of MHPs, equivalent to 0, 0.6,
1.2, 2.4, 12, and 24 × 10–3 wt % graphene content
in the films. The thickness of the films is given in Table S1.Figure a shows the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) profiles for the
reference film and for those with increasing amounts of G-platelets.
The samples are polycrystalline films of tetragonal MAPbI3, indexed to an I4cm tetragonal
cell,[11,37] with an important fraction of (110)-oriented
grains. All samples contain a minor amount of PbI2 impurity.
The tetragonal-perovskite lattice parameters were refined by a profile
matching approach (Figure S2) obtaining
values of 8.865(1) Å and 12.661(4) Å for a and c, respectively. These values do not change
when graphene is added, showing that, as expected, the perovskite
composition is not modified.
Figure 1
(a) XRPD profiles (Cu Kα1/α2) of
the 0G–10G
MAPbI3 films at 300 K. The asterisks indicate the impurity
of PbI2. (b) Variation of the average crystal domain size
of the MAPbI3 films with the graphene content. (c) Preferred
orientation-graphene concentration relationship of the MAPbI3 films. Time evolution of (d) (001) reflection intensity of the PbI2 degradation product and (e) (110) reflection intensity of
MAPbI3.
(a) XRPD profiles (Cu Kα1/α2) of
the 0G–10G
MAPbI3 films at 300 K. The asterisks indicate the impurity
of PbI2. (b) Variation of the average crystal domain size
of the MAPbI3 films with the graphene content. (c) Preferred
orientation-graphene concentration relationship of the MAPbI3 films. Time evolution of (d) (001) reflection intensity of the PbI2 degradation product and (e) (110) reflection intensity of
MAPbI3.The average crystal domain
size in the films has been carefully
obtained using the Williamson-Hall (WH) methodology (See Figure S3
in the Supporting Information). This method
allows determining the crystal domain size and strain with great precision
since the whole diffraction pattern is used instead of a single peak.
The domain size for the smallest amount of graphene, 2.5G film, shows
an increase of approximately 8 nm. Such an increase (∼10%)
is reliable considering the very small error (red whickers in Figure b) provided by the
standard deviations shown in Figure S3.
Besides, derived from the WH analysis, it can be stated that the films
are free of microstrain, in view of the small slopes of the straight
lines used to fit the data in Figure S3. On the other hand, Figure c shows the dependence of the (110) preferred orientation
on the graphene content in the perovskite films. It is clearly observed
that the reference film and the one with the lowest amount of G-platelets,
2.5G, present a high degree of alignment (55–60%) compared
to a powder sample; however, a further increase in the amount of graphene
results in a decrease in the fraction of aligned crystals (40–45%)
and therefore an increase in the polycrystalline fraction.The
stability of the films under ambient conditions (25 °C,
40–60% RH) over time has been followed by XRPD (Figure S4). The degradation of the films can
be followed by the evolution of the intensities of (001) PbI2 and (110) MAPbI3 reflections with time (Figure d,e). The evolution of the
PbI2 (001) reflection with time may lead to conclude that
the PbI2 content increases to large proportions and that
there is a large degradation of the perovskite films. However, it
has to be highlighted that to quantitatively analyze the diffraction
patterns, the almost complete (001) preferred orientation of PbI2, that provides a greatly enhanced intensity of the (00l) maxima, has to be considered. In fact, the degree of
degradation of the perovskite phase is small even after 2000 hours,
as confirmed by the intensity of the (110) MAPbI3 reflection
which decreases only a little with time (Figure e). The role of graphene in the perovskite
stabilization is evidenced by the time evolution of both peaks (Figure d,e). After up to
2000 hours, the degradation of the films is hampered by the introduction
of graphene and more efficiently as graphene concentration increases.
Optical Absorption and Photoluminescence
The measured optical absorption spectra of the thin films (Figure a) are independent
of G doping for the low graphene concentrations, up to 10G, but a
slight increase is detected for a higher graphene content (50G and
100G). The optical band gaps were obtained from the second derivatives
of the optical spectra (upper panel of Figure a)[37,38] that show a local minima
at 775 nm (1.60 ± 0.05 eV) for all films (the full width at half-maximum
of the second derivative is assumed as the error) that correspond
to the direct semiconductor-type transitions at the R point in the
pseudo-cubic Brillouin zone.[3,39] The absorption spectra
have been recorded along ∼2200 hours to explore the evolution
of the undoped and G-doped MAPbI3 films under ambient conditions; Figure b shows the time
evolution of 0G and 2.5G samples (see Figure S5a,b for the evolution of absorption spectra for 5G and 10G). With time,
the MAPbI3 absorption edge amplitudes barely decrease,
indicating that the degradation is moderate in all cases but is slightly
more pronounced for the 0G film compared to the G-doped films. These
results are consistent with the trends of the (110) perovskite diffraction
peak upon G incorporation (Figure e). Optical absorption results thus confirm that G-platelet
addition in the perovskite precursor solution benefits the ambient
stability of the thin film, delaying its degradation.
Figure 2
(a) Optical absorption,
α, of the thin films (lower panel)
and second derivative (upper panel). (b) Time evolution of 0G and
2.5G samples for up to 2160 hours. (c) Raw absorbance data of the
0G–10G films and simulations (black lines, see the text below)
of 2.5G, 5G, and 10G considering effective hole fractions per unit
area in the films of 10–60, 10–28, and 10–6.5, respectively.
(a) Optical absorption,
α, of the thin films (lower panel)
and second derivative (upper panel). (b) Time evolution of 0G and
2.5G samples for up to 2160 hours. (c) Raw absorbance data of the
0G–10G films and simulations (black lines, see the text below)
of 2.5G, 5G, and 10G considering effective hole fractions per unit
area in the films of 10–60, 10–28, and 10–6.5, respectively.The plateaus typically observed in the high-energy range of absorbance
spectra for MAPbI3 films with thickness in the range of
the samples (>500 nm) studied here are due to the combination of
two
factors: (1) the weakness of the signal that reaches the detector
above the gap (the signal through the samples is 10OD lower
than that of the reference channel) and (2) the presence of “pinholes”
in the film (or regions with smaller thickness). In Figure c, the raw spectra for the
0G–10G films in the spectral region of glass (the substrate)
transparency are shown. The plateau, above 2.5 eV, of the 0G film
is observed at OD ∼ 5 that is around the detection limit of
the detector. However, in the other samples, the plateau appears at
lower OD values, thus revealing the presence of pinholes. The optical
transmission of a thin film with pinholes is equivalent to a continuous
film with, in parallel, a hole of a certain area. In fact, what most
probably occurs is the presence of microscopic regions in the films
with significantly lower thicknesses than the average, rather than
pinholes across the 500 nm. The simplest approximation to take this
into account is considering one effective hole in the film. The continuous
lines in the figure correspond to the spectra resulting from combining
the 0G spectrum in parallel with a hole-effective fraction Ah = fraction of the film without MAPbI3. The fits for 2.5G and 5G spectra using Ah = 10–60 and 10–28, respectively,
are excellent. These are extremely small hole-effective fractions
in the films but unambiguously demonstrate that graphene induces some
increasing porosity. For the 10G film, the equivalent hole fraction
is significantly higher, Ah = 10–6.5, and the approximation is not so good since it cannot adequately
fit the region from 2 to 2.5 eV; however, it shows that the porosity
is drastically increased. Therefore, while graphene delays degradation,
it also modifies the morphology of the grains and their packing within
the film increasing progressively its porosity. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images (Figure S5c,d)
confirm that porosity increases with the addition of graphene platelets.
Moreover, since graphene is an impermeable membrane to gases,[40] it may be partly sealing the surface of the
grains and we hypothesize that could hamper ionic diffusion.Regarding photoluminescence (PL), the addition of G does not induce
significant changes in the emission of the samples; all present the
characteristic band at an identical energy: 1.60 eV (775 nm) (Figure S6). However, graphene affects the evolution
of PL intensity with irradiation time (Figure a). The time evolution of PL intensity during
500 s under continuous 488 nm wavelength laser irradiation (18 W/cm2) for samples 0G–10G is shown in Figure b. The PL emission in MHPs has been extensively
studied and reported to exhibit a complex evolution with illumination,
time, environmental conditions, and the nature of the layer on which
the perovskite grows.[11,41] The presence of defects, particularly
halide vacancies, photoinduced defects and, in general, trap states
and their evolution with the factors described above, plays an important
role in the nonradiative processes influencing the recombination dynamics.[42,43] In an earlier work,[11] we identified four
main stages under ambient conditions that MAPbI3 evolves
under laser irradiation by measuring the PL and the concomitant thin-film
Raman spectra. A decrease in the PL intensity under ambient conditions
corresponded to the appearance of Raman modes associated with PbO, that therefore, is indicative of the beginning
of degradation that eventually results in the total fading of the
PL emission.
Figure 3
(a) PL spectra evolution with time up to 400 s for the
undoped
MAPbI3, 0G, and G-doped MAPbI3 as 2.5G, 5G,
and 10G thin films under irradiation with λexc =
488 nm and Pinc = 18 W/cm2.
(b) Normalized time evolution of the PL maximum intensity during 500
s and (c) PL emission spectra at 250 s of irradiation.
(a) PL spectra evolution with time up to 400 s for the
undoped
MAPbI3, 0G, and G-doped MAPbI3 as 2.5G, 5G,
and 10G thin films under irradiation with λexc =
488 nm and Pinc = 18 W/cm2.
(b) Normalized time evolution of the PL maximum intensity during 500
s and (c) PL emission spectra at 250 s of irradiation.Low and intermediate graphene concentrations provoke less
and slower
quenching of the PL emission with time (Figure b), retaining more than 50% of the initial
emission intensity at 250 s under high-power-density laser irradiation
under ambient conditions, while 0G thin-film emission retains only
25% of the initial value. Figure c shows the PL emission spectra at 250 s. In the case
of the 10G film, the evolution with time is better than 0G at short
times, but after ∼180 s, it is similar to the film without
graphene (0G). The better performance of 2.5G and 5G films under irradiation
is consistent with the proposed partial graphene sealing of the grains.
However, the limited efficiency of the films with a higher graphene
content indicates a trade-off between a better sealing of the grains
with the incorporation of graphene and an increasing porosity of the
films that facilitates the access to ambient oxygen and water.
Resistivity and Activation Energy
We have studied the
effect of G-platelet incorporation on the dark
dc resistivity, ρ, of MAPbI3 thin films with temperature
across the tetragonal to cubic structural transition. All measurements
exhibit Ohmic behavior (Figure S7) and
a value at 303 K of 2.2 ± 0.2% MΩ·cm for the 0G sample,
within published values for MAPbI3,: 6.6,[44] 51,[45] or 38 MΩ·cm[46] for polycrystalline samples and 13 MΩ·cm[46] in single crystals.The variation of resistivity
in the 25–100 °C (298–373 K) temperature range
is shown in Figure (Arrhenius plot). All thin films exhibit similar behaviors. However,
the 2.5G MAPbI3 thin film shows slightly lower resistivity
values for the tetragonal phase, T < 333 K. The
temperature of the observed turning points in resistivity (at ∼323
K) is very close to the structural, tetragonal (I4mcm) to cubic (Pm3̅m), transition temperature, Tc = 328 K,[47] pointing out to a correlation
between the resistivity behavior and the crystalline phase transition.
The impact of structural transitions on optical,[48−50] thermal,[51] dielectric,[52] and
photovoltaic[53] properties of MHPs has been
investigated and the electronic structures for both crystalline structures
of MAPbI3 were calculated.[54] In general, experiments show relatively minor effects at the cubic–tetragonal
transition; however, previous works[55−58] reported a significant conductivity
increase at the tetragonal to orthorhombic low-temperature transition,
around 160 K, related to the disorder-order character of the transition,
due to MA cation ordering.[47] The tetragonal
to cubic transition has also been described as a disorder-order transition
in several perovskites;[59,60] so, a similar effect
on resistivity cannot be ruled out. In fact, this uncommon behavior
for a metal-semiconducting crossover with temperature was observed
by Głowienka et al.[61] for dark conductivity,
σ, in MAPbI3–Cl thin films between 280 and 340 K and by Sveinbjörnsson
et al.[62] between 293 and 353 K under illumination
in MAPbI3 crystals.
Figure 4
Arrhenius plots for resistivity of the
0G, 2.5G, and 5G MAPbI3 thin films from 298 to 373 K (25–100
°C). The
dotted arrow indicates the temperature turning point at 323 K as a
guide to the eye.
Arrhenius plots for resistivity of the
0G, 2.5G, and 5G MAPbI3 thin films from 298 to 373 K (25–100
°C). The
dotted arrow indicates the temperature turning point at 323 K as a
guide to the eye.The activation energy
(Ea) can be obtained
for the cubic phase from the expression for thermally activated conduction, , where ρ0 is a pre-exponential
factor and kB and T are
the Boltzmann constant and the temperature of the sample, respectively. Ea values of 0.28, 0.24, and 0.46 eV for undoped
0G and doped 2.5G and 5G MAPbI3 thin films are obtained,
respectively. In the tetragonal phase, the resistivity increases with
temperature (from 298 to 320 K), which is the opposite trend to that
of a semiconductor. The structural transition may have an impact on
the electronic conduction in a temperature range so close around Tc, but ionic conduction has to be considered
since it has an important role in MHPs. The degree of ionic contribution
to the charge transport in MHPs is controversial. In all-inorganic
halide perovskites, it is commonly accepted that halide-ion conduction
via the vacancy diffusion mechanism is the dominant conduction process,
with reported activation values in the range of 0.2–0.9 eV.[63−65] For MAPbI3, Ea calculated
from first principles is reported to be 0.58 eV for iodine vacancies,[66] quite larger than the Ea values obtained here in the cubic phase, so electronic conduction
seems to be dominating dc transport. Very low graphene concentration
(2.5G) lowers the hopping activation energy Ea, while larger amounts hinder this hopping transport mechanism
(Ea increases). The increase of the crystalline
domain size is induced by the addition of low graphene concentration
in the 2.5G sample, while maintaining the fraction of (110) oriented
crystals (Figure )
reduces the density of grain boundaries facilitating intergrain hopping.
However, for the 5G sample, grain size and preferential orientation
degree are depleted, and the porosity slightly increases compared
to undoped MAPbI3 films, hampering hopping.
Devices: Solar Cells
Photovoltaic Characteristics
and Stability
To evaluate the influence of the G-platelet
content (0G–100G)
in the active layer of solar cells on the photovoltaic performance,
different concentrations of G-platelets in the MAPbI3 have
been tested in inverted cells with the structure: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3:G/PCBM/BCP/Al (details are given in the Supporting Information). The photovoltaic parameters, that
is, short-circuit photocurrent (JSC),
open-circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor
(FF), and PCE, were measured under ambient conditions and AM 1.5G
solar simulator with a light intensity of 100 mW/cm2. The
statistical distribution of these parameters and representative J–V characteristics are shown in Figure S8, and the data of the average and champion
devices in reverse and forward scans are collected in Table S2. Undoubtedly, the lower amount of G
(2.5G) in the MAPbI3 active layer leads to an improvement
of ∼6.6% in the final PCE of 2.5G-based solar cells compared
to that without graphene (0G). The graphene content above 10G in the
active layer induces important photocurrent losses, probably associated
to the observed poor crystalline quality of the samples[67−69] and the increasing porosity of the films with the G content. Interestingly,
the VOC value does not decrease indicating
that energy level matching for charge extraction does not suffer significant
alterations.[18] To summarize, a low graphene
content in the active layer (2.5G: 0.6 × 10-3 wt %
G/PVK) induces, as previously indicated, larger crystalline domains,
high preferential orientation, and an increased conductivity, all
contributing to an improvement in the final efficiency of the device.Based on these results, we have optimized the devices with the
2.5G graphene content in the structure: ITO/SnO2/MAPbI3:G/spiro-OMeTAD/Au, (see the Supporting Information for experimental details). Comparison of solar
cell parameters, JSC, VOC, FF, and PCE, of photovoltaic devices using active
MHP layers with and without graphene is shown in Figure a–d, respectively, and
summarized in Table S3. Graphene addition
increases the reproducibility and averaged values of all the photovoltaic
parameters, especially VOC. There is a
relative increase in the average PCE of 15% for the 2.5G sample over
the reference cell without graphene. J–V curves of champion devices without graphene, 0G, and 2.5G
are plotted in Figure S9a. There is a good
agreement between the photocurrent measured in the J–V and calculated from incident photon current
efficiency measurements (Figure S9b). We
observed again that the average crystal domain is increased with graphene
addition, as shown in Figure S10.
Figure 5
(a–d)
Statistical results, average value (open square),
and standard deviation of the resulting photovoltaic parameters for
ITO/SnO2/perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD/Au devices with 0G (no
graphene) and with graphene, 2.5G active layers. (e) Normalized PCE
evolution of the non encapsulated device under continuous AM1.5G illumination
under ambient conditions (T = 25 °C, RH ∼
40–60%). (f) Recombination resistances, Rrec, from impedance spectroscopy measurements.
(a–d)
Statistical results, average value (open square),
and standard deviation of the resulting photovoltaic parameters for
ITO/SnO2/perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD/Au devices with 0G (no
graphene) and with graphene, 2.5G active layers. (e) Normalized PCE
evolution of the non encapsulated device under continuous AM1.5G illumination
under ambient conditions (T = 25 °C, RH ∼
40–60%). (f) Recombination resistances, Rrec, from impedance spectroscopy measurements.Interestingly, graphene addition also has a positive effect
on
the stability of the PSCs as expected from the fundamental characterization
commented above. Devices were tested under high stress conditions
using non encapsulated samples and constant AM1.5G lighting for 30
min under ambient conditions with a relative humidity of 40–60%.
The presence of graphene has a positive influence on the stability
of the solar cell. Figure e shows that the solar cell based on a 2.5G active layer retains
83% of its original efficiency, while without graphene, the efficiency
is reduced to 73%. VOC time evolution
for both samples is almost identical, see Figure S11, with a small decrease during the first minutes and a stabilization
afterward. However, JSC and FF decrease
faster for the samples without graphene, see Figure S11.Impedance spectroscopy experiments were performed
on regular 0G
and 2.5G PSCs, and measurements were fitted using the equivalent circuit
of Figure S12a, according to the model
reported in a previous work,[70] considering
the transport resistance in the perovskite layer negligible in comparison
with the recombination resistance, Rrec, as it is expected in high-performance PSCs. Two arcs are observed
in the Nyquist plot as commonly reported in most of the PSCs, as shown
in Figure S12b.[70]Figure f shows that Rrec increases when an optimized amount of graphene
is added, 0.6 × 10–3 wt %, pointing to a decrease
of the nonradiative recombination in the 2.5G PSC, in good agreement
with the observed increase in VOC.
Conclusions
We tracked the influence of the small graphene
platelet content
(0–24 × 10–3 wt %) on the structural
and optoelectronic properties of MHP thin films under ambient conditions
and found a double effect that, properly balanced, can improve the
device performance and stability of the final solar cell devices.
On the one hand, a graphene content of 0.6 × 10-3 wt
% G/PVK induces the growth of larger crystalline domains maintaining
a high preferential orientation, which increases the stability of
the MAPbI3 films with time under ambient conditions and
the endurance to illumination. On the other hand, the porosity of
the films that increases with graphene concentration reduces conductivity
and could allow the faster diffusion of oxygen and moisture deep into
the layer. An appropriated balance tuning graphene content to 0.6
× 10–3 wt % G/PVK (2.5G) in the precursor solution
produces an increase of all photovoltaic parameters and consequently
of the final photoconversion efficiency and delays the degradation,
increasing grain size, reducing nonradiative recombination probably
by partly sealing the surface of the grains without significantly
modifying morphology of the grains and their packing within the film
enhancing progressively its porosity. These results open the door
to future studies seeking a balance between the processing and efficiency
of this composite material through cost-effective perovskite metal
halide design strategies aimed at overcoming the stability barrier.
Authors: Andrea Pisoni; Jaćim Jaćimović; Osor S Barišić; Massimo Spina; Richard Gaál; László Forró; Endre Horváth Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Aurélien M A Leguy; Pooya Azarhoosh; M Isabel Alonso; Mariano Campoy-Quiles; Oliver J Weber; Jizhong Yao; Daniel Bryant; Mark T Weller; Jenny Nelson; Aron Walsh; Mark van Schilfgaarde; Piers R F Barnes Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Tomas Leijtens; Samuel D Stranks; Giles E Eperon; Rebecka Lindblad; Erik M J Johansson; Ian J McPherson; Håkan Rensmo; James M Ball; Michael M Lee; Henry J Snaith Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Mahboubeh Hadadian; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Elaheh K Goharshadi; Amita Ummadisingu; Ji-Youn Seo; Jingshan Luo; Somayeh Gholipour; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Michael Saliba; Antonio Abate; Michael Grätzel; Anders Hagfeldt Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Christopher Eames; Jarvist M Frost; Piers R F Barnes; Brian C O'Regan; Aron Walsh; M Saiful Islam Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 14.919