| Literature DB >> 34977380 |
Yingmei Qin1, Lingyun He1, Yanfei Wang1, Dong Li1, Weijun Chen1, Jidan Ye1.
Abstract
In this study, we conducted a 56-d feeding trial to investigate the effects of replacing the fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on the performance, tissue fatty acid (FA) composition, and mRNA levels of genes related to hepatic lipid metabolism in grouper (Epinephelus coioides). Five isolipidic (13% crude lipid) and isonitrogenous (48% CP) diets were formulated by incrementally adding PO to the control diet (25% fish meal and 9% added FO) to replace FO in the control diets. Triplicate groups of 30 groupers (initial weight: 12.6 ± 0.1 g) were fed one of the diets twice daily, to apparent satiety. The replacement of FO with 50% PO revealed maximum growth without affecting the performance and whole-body proximate compositions, and replacing FO with 100% PO revealed a comparable (P > 0.05) growth with that of the control diet, suggesting PO as a suitable alternative to FO. The analysis of FA profiles in the dorsal muscle and liver though reflected the FA profile of the diet, PO substitutions above 50% could compromise (P < 0.05) the FA profile in the liver and flesh of the fish species in comparison with the control diet. Furthermore, the mRNA levels of FAS, G6PD, LPL, PPARΑ, and Δ6FAD genes in the liver had positive linear and/or quadratic responses, but the SCD, HSL, ATGL, FABP, SREBP-1C and ELOVL5 had the opposite trend, with increasing dietary PO inclusion levels, whereas the mRNA level of ACC was not affected by dietary treatments. The optimal level of PO substitution for FO was estimated to be 47.1% of the feed, based on the regression analysis of percent weight gains against dietary PO inclusion levels; however, it might affect the FA profile in the liver and flesh of the fish species, and further study is required to investigate whether the changes in tissue FA composition will affect the welfare and market value over a production cycle of grouper.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary lipid; Epinephelus coioides; Fatty acid metabolism; Growth performance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34977380 PMCID: PMC8669253 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.04.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Ingredients and composition of experimental diets (as-fed basis, %).
| Item | Diets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | |
| Ingredients | |||||
| Fish meal | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Wheat gluten meal | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Soybean meal | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Gelatin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Casein | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Shrimp meal | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Corn starch | 12.75 | 12.75 | 12.75 | 12.75 | 12.75 |
| Menhaden fish oil | 9 | 6.75 | 4.5 | 2.25 | 0 |
| Palm oil | 0 | 2.25 | 4.5 | 6.75 | 9 |
| Soy lecithin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Mineral premix | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Stay-C 35% | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Mold inhibitors | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Feed antioxidants | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Ca(H2PO4)2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Choline chloride | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Proximate composition | |||||
| DM | 92.96 | 92.57 | 92.83 | 92.70 | 93.12 |
| CP | 48.42 | 48.50 | 48.42 | 48.22 | 48.26 |
| Crude lipid | 13.64 | 13.46 | 13.55 | 13.75 | 13.51 |
| Ash | 8.09 | 8.23 | 8.26 | 8.31 | 8.30 |
FO = fish oil; PO = palm oil; 0% PO = control diet without PO addition.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Peru fish meal: CP 68.87% and crude lipid 8.96%; Wheat gluten meal: CP 80.71%; Soybean meal: CP 46.64% and crude lipid 0.62%; Gelatin: CP 88.35% and crude lipid 0.21%; Casein: CP 89.66% and 0.13%; Shrimp meal: CP 58.45% and crude lipid 5.58%; Corn starch: CP 0.41% and crude lipid 0.15%. All the ingredients were obtained from Jiakang Feed Co. Ltd., Xiamen, China. Peru fish meal was further degreased with n-hexane and its crude lipid was reduced to 4.01%.
Vitamin premix (per kilogram diet): retinol acetate, 10 mg; 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, 10 mg; DL-α-tocopherol acetate, 100 mg; menadione sodium bisulfate, 10 mg; thiamin nitrate, 10 mg; riboflavin, 20 mg; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 20 mg; cyanocobalamin, 0.05 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; calcium-D- pantothenate, 100 mg; D-biotin, 1 mg; meso-inositol, 500 mg; folic acid, 4 mg.
Mineral premix (per kilogram diet): ferric citrate, 497 mg; CuSO4·5H2O, 24 mg; ZnSO4·7H2O, 176 mg; MnSO4·4H2O, 122 mg; CoCl2·6H2O, 0.18 mg; KIO3, 0.51 mg; Na2SeO3, 0.33 mg.
Mold inhibitors: 50% calcium propionic acid and 50% dimethyl fumarate.
Feed antioxidants: 50% ethoxyquin and 50% butylated hydroxytoluene.
Fatty acid composition (mg/g lipid) of lipid sources and experimental diets.
| Fatty acids | FO | PO | Diets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | |||
| C14:0 | 38.0 | 7.3 | 33.7 | 28.0 | 21.8 | 16.1 | 10.4 |
| C16:0 | 156.7 | 286.5 | 164.8 | 195.3 | 213.4 | 226.4 | 246.0 |
| C18:0 | 38.4 | 26.2 | 32.3 | 31.2 | 29.0 | 27.6 | 26.3 |
| C19:0 | 32.1 | 20.7 | 28.1 | 20.1 | 23.5 | 24.2 | 21.5 |
| C21:0 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| C22:0 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| ΣSFA | 270.4 | 341.1 | 263.5 | 278.0 | 290.2 | 297.2 | 306.4 |
| C16:1 | 51.9 | 3.2 | 44.2 | 33.8 | 25.1 | 16.4 | 7.8 |
| C17:1 | 3.0 | ND | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| C18:1n-9 (OA) | 137.1 | 349.6 | 130.1 | 177.3 | 226.0 | 278.7 | 330.2 |
| C20:1 | 2.9 | ND | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| C24:1 | 4.1 | ND | 3.9 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.1 |
| ΣMUFA | 199.4 | 353.2 | 182.3 | 218.2 | 256.7 | 299.3 | 340.8 |
| C18:2n-6 (LA) | 76.1 | 96.8 | 81.0 | 98.7 | 112.2 | 124.2 | 139.8 |
| C18:3n-6 | 13.9 | ND | 14.3 | 10.7 | 7.9 | 4.7 | 1.6 |
| C20:2n-6 | 15.3 | ND | 16.5 | 12.9 | 9.6 | 6.5 | 3.4 |
| C20:3n-6 | 4.2 | ND | 4.2 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| C20:4n-6 (ARA) | 12.9 | ND | 6.6 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| Σn-6 PUFA | 122.2 | 97.5 | 122.8 | 130.6 | 136.7 | 140.4 | 147.6 |
| C18:3n-3 (LNA) | 21.6 | 6.0 | 18.4 | 16.0 | 14.2 | 9.7 | 8.0 |
| C20:5n-3 (EPA) | 72.6 | ND | 58.9 | 45.8 | 34.3 | 22.9 | 11.9 |
| C22:5n-3 | 13.5 | ND | 8.2 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 1.7 |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | 108.2 | ND | 91.5 | 71.0 | 52.4 | 33.6 | 16.3 |
| Σn-3 PUFA | 215.6 | 6.1 | 177.3 | 139.6 | 105.7 | 69.6 | 37.3 |
| Σn-3 LC-PUFA | 194.2 | ND | 158.8 | 123.5 | 91.9 | 59.6 | 29.5 |
| DHA/EPA | 1.49 | – | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.53 | 1.46 | 1.37 |
| n-3/n-6 PUFA | 1.76 | 0.06 | 1.44 | 1.07 | 0.78 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
FO = fish oil; PO = palm oil; 0% PO = control diet without PO addition.
SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid; LC-PUFA = long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids; OA = oleic acid; LA = linoleic acid; ARA = arachidonic acid; LNA = linolenic acid; DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid; ND = not detected.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Fig. 1The changes of dissolved oxygen and water temperature across a feeding period of 56 d.
Primers sequences used for real-time PCR.
| Genes | Forward primer sequence (5′-3′) | Reverse primer sequence (5′-3′) | KEGG No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| TGCTGTCCCTGTATGCCTCT | CCTTGATGTCACGCACGAT | – | |
| GGCAAGCCACTCTGGTACAT | GGCTATGTCTGACCGCAGAA | FJ196231 | |
| GGTGGGATACCTACTGGGGT | GGGAACCATACCTGTCCTGC | FJ196229 | |
| ATGTCCCACAACGCTATCCG | GGCCAGACTCTTTGTGTCCA | FJ849065 | |
| CATCGTGATACACGGCTGGA | CAATCACATTGGCACTGGGC | EU683732 | |
| CTCATCATTTGGGTCTGGG | GAAGATGTTGGGTTTAGCG | EU715405 | |
| CAGTTAAGGTGAACCGGGCT | ATCTGAACTGGAGCAGTGCC | KF049203 | |
| TGACAACCTGCCTCAGTACG | TGGATGCTCGTGTTGGTGAA | KY649281 | |
| GCGTGTTTCGTGTATGGTGG | GGAGTTTCCGATGGCCAGAA | NM198815 | |
| GGCGAACCGTCTCTTCTACC | CCTGTTCCAGCCTTTTGTGC | XM010731710 | |
| CAGAAATCCAGCAGAACGGC | GCTTGACGATGCACTTGAGC | AF254642 | |
| GGTTCAAACCATGGCACCAC | GTCGTGCTTCAGAGTGGTCA | KT937284 | |
| AGGGCCGTTTCTACAAGGTG | GCGGCTAGTTTCTCCTCTCC | HM037343 | |
| GCCTGTGCCAGACAAGGTTA | GCGTCCGGACAATAACCAGA | KU179484 |
FAS = fatty acid synthase; ACC = acetyl-CoA carboxylase; G6PD = glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; SCD = stearoyl-CoA desaturase; LPL = lipoprotein lipase; HSL = hormone-sensitive lipase; PPARα = peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α; CPT = carnitine palmitoyltransferase; ATGL = adipose triglyceride lipase; SREBP-1c = sterol-regulatory element-binding protein-1c; Δ6FAD = delta-6 fatty acyl desaturase; FABP = fatty acid binding proteins; ELOVL = elongase of very long-chain fatty acids.
Effects of dietary replacement of fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on growth performance of Epinephelus coioides in a 56-d feeding period.1
| Item | Diets | Pooled SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| IBW | 12.58 | 12.58 | 12.62 | 12.59 | 12.62 | 0.007 | 0.120 | ||
| FBW | 69.19ab | 69.00ab | 72.16a | 70.54ab | 66.96b | 0.716 | 0.033 | 0.584 | 0.128 |
| WG | 450.1ab | 455.3ab | 470.2a | 460.4ab | 441.1b | 3.667 | 0.032 | 0.635 | 0.034 |
| FR | 2.29 | 2.37 | 2.40 | 2.31 | 2.35 | 0.015 | 0.111 | 0.552 | 0.284 |
| FE | 107 | 103 | 104 | 106 | 103 | 0.800 | 0.355 | 0.428 | 0.661 |
| Survival | 95.56 | 96.67 | 95.56 | 93.33 | 96.67 | 0.840 | 0.777 | 0.859 | 0.894 |
| HSI | 2.11 | 2.05 | 2.13 | 2.17 | 2.18 | 0.041 | 0.905 | 0.404 | 0.688 |
| CF | 2.33 | 2.40 | 2.49 | 2.46 | 2.49 | 0.031 | 0.441 | 0.083 | 0.171 |
FO = fish oil; PO = palm oil; 0% PO = control diet without PO addition; IBW = initial body weight; FBW = final body weight; WG = weight gain; FR = feeding rate; FE = feed efficiency; HSI = hepatosomatic index; CF = condition factor.
a, b Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Data were presented as means of 3 triplicates per dietary treatment.
Data were presented as means of 18 fish per dietary treatment.
WG (%) = 100 × (FBW - IBW)/IBW.
FR = 100 × feed intake/[(FBW + IBW)/2 × days].
FE (%) = 100 × (FBW - IBW)/feed intake (as fed basis, g/fish).
Survival (%) = 100 × (final No. of fish)/(initial No. of fish).
HSI (%) = 100 × (liver weight/BW).
CF (%) = 100 × BW/(body length)3.
Fig. 2The relationship between dietary palm oil (PO) substitution levels for marine fish oil and percent weight gain (WG) of groupers (Epinephelus coioides) in a 56-d feeding period. Values are means of 3 triplicates per dietary treatment.
Effects of dietary replacement of fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on proximate composition (%:%, wt:wt) of whole-body, muscle and liver of Epinephelus coioides in a 56-d feeding period.1
| Item | Diets | Pooled SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Whole-body | |||||||||
| Moisture | 67.48 | 65.98 | 66.61 | 67.01 | 66.11 | 0.303 | 0.549 | 0.445 | 0.705 |
| Protein | 18.34 | 19.52 | 19.39 | 19.24 | 19.39 | 0.151 | 0.074 | 0.088 | 0.046 |
| Lipid | 8.10 | 8.54 | 8.65 | 8.24 | 8.71 | 0.109 | 0.332 | 0.249 | 0.467 |
| Ash | 4.71 | 4.62 | 4.61 | 4.76 | 4.68 | 0.055 | 0.937 | 0.858 | 0.911 |
| Muscle | |||||||||
| Moisture | 74.48 | 75.75 | 74.68 | 75.49 | 75.66 | 0.251 | 0.404 | 0.255 | 0.531 |
| Lipid | 1.81 | 2.07 | 2.19 | 2.00 | 1.96 | 0.070 | 0.573 | 0.669 | 0.272 |
| Protein | 20.27 | 20.02 | 21.36 | 20.78 | 20.73 | 0.237 | 0.101 | 0.336 | 0.096 |
| Liver | |||||||||
| Moisture | 60.65a | 61.56a | 60.03a | 52.96b | 45.27b | 1.891 | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Lipid | 6.20b | 6.07b | 7.79b | 10.14a | 12.28a | 0.699 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Protein | 6.99 | 6.85 | 6.97 | 6.93 | 6.66 | 0.107 | 0.904 | 0.464 | 0.700 |
a, b Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Data are presented as means of 3 replicates per dietary treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Effects of dietary replacement of fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on plasma components (mmol/L) of Epinephelus coioides in a 56-d feeding period.1
| Items | Diets | Pooled SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| GLU | 4.54 | 4.17 | 4.24 | 4.47 | 4.34 | 0.238 | 0.991 | 0.954 | 0.999 |
| TG | 1.33b | 3.07ab | 3.86a | 3.27ab | 1.90ab | 0.362 | 0.039 | 0.621 | 0.022 |
| TC | 2.34ab | 2.47ab | 3.10a | 2.17ab | 1.83b | 0.145 | 0.042 | 0.208 | 0.036 |
| HDL-C | 0.48ab | 0.47ab | 0.62a | 0.31b | 0.41ab | 0.033 | 0.044 | 0.207 | 0.395 |
| LDL-C | 2.03 | 2.36 | 2.27 | 2.05 | 2.18 | 0.089 | 0.756 | 0.988 | 0.836 |
GLU = glucose; TG = triglyceride; TC = total cholesterol; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
a, b Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
The fish were fasted for 24 h before plasma collection. Data are presented as means of 3 replicates per dietary treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Effects of dietary replacement of fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on liver fatty acid composition (mg/g lipid) of Epinephelus coioides in a 56-d feeding period.1
| Fatty acids | Diets | Pooled SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| C14:0 | 14.4a | 13.7ab | 12.7ab | 11.8ab | 10.5b | 0.476 | 0.041 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| C16:0 | 131.4d | 139.2c | 143.8c | 152.4b | 163.6a | 3.087 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C18:0 | 31.8ab | 32.9a | 31.7a | 30.3ab | 26.8b | 0.763 | 0.013 | 0.077 | 0.010 |
| C19:0 | 13.6a | 13.4a | 7.5b | 6.6b | 5.8b | 1.141 | 0.025 | 0.020 | 0.068 |
| C21:0 | 3.0a | 2.5a | 1.6b | 1.0c | 0.4c | 0.245 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C22:0 | 0.9a | 0.8a | 0.8ab | 0.8ab | 0.6b | 0.028 | 0.012 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
| ΣSFA | 194.5b | 202.7ab | 198.4ab | 203.7ab | 208.1a | 1.736 | 0.039 | 0.027 | 0.173 |
| C16:1 | 32.7a | 25.8b | 23.7b | 20.3c | 15.3d | 1.547 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.012 |
| C17:1 | 3.3a | 2.5b | 2.6b | 2.0bc | 1.5c | 0.175 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.066 |
| C18:1n-9 (OA) | 133.6e | 161.9d | 201.4c | 247.7b | 273.2a | 13.692 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C20:1 | 9.0b | 9.2a | 10.2a | 9.7a | 10.5a | 0.973 | <0.001 | 0.087 | 0.209 |
| C24:1 | 2.9a | 2.9a | 2.5a | 2.4a | 1.5b | 0.161 | 0.006 | 0.023 | 0.087 |
| ΣMUFA | 181.1e | 203.5d | 241.6c | 282.1b | 301.2a | 12.621 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.014 |
| C18:2n-6 (LA) | 96.4b | 103.4ab | 106.9ab | 113.2ab | 127.7a | 4.334 | 0.008 | 0.004 | 0.029 |
| C18:3n-6 | 0.5ab | 0.4b | 0.6ab | 0.6ab | 1.2a | 0.043 | 0.004 | 0.043 | 0.097 |
| C20:2n-6 | 7.8a | 6.1b | 5.5b | 2.2c | 3.2c | 0.539 | <0.001 | 0.022 | 0.034 |
| C20:3n-6 | 1.5a | 1.1b | 1.2ab | 1.3ab | 1.2ab | 0.074 | 0.035 | 0.296 | 0.373 |
| C20:4n-6 (ARA) | 8.5a | 8.7a | 6.3ab | 4.8b | 2.6c | 0.651 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Σn-6 PUFA | 115.6 | 120.3 | 120.2 | 122.8 | 135.8 | 3.382 | 0.448 | 0.057 | 0.128 |
| C18:3n-3 (LNA) | 15.8a | 15.3a | 13.1b | 12.4b | 10.6b | 0.546 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.014 |
| C20:5n-3 (EPA) | 33.8a | 30.5a | 24.8b | 15.3c | 8.7d | 7.215 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C22:5n-3 | 21.7a | 13.1b | 12.3b | 8.4c | 5.0c | 1.547 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | 95.2a | 79.0b | 58.5c | 36.9d | 19.3e | 2.513 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Σn-3 PUFA | 166.8a | 138.5b | 108.3c | 71.6d | 43.7e | 11.543 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Σn-3 LC-PUFA | 150.6a | 122.6b | 95.7c | 60.8d | 32.9e | 11.060 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| DHA/EPA | 2.87a | 2.63a | 2.45b | 2.34b | 2.19b | 0.104 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| n-3/n-6 PUFA | 1.51a | 1.14b | 0.83bc | 0.59cd | 0.34d | 0.116 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
FO = fish oil; PO = palm oil; SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid; LC-PUFA = long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids; OA = oleic acid; LA = linoleic acid; ARA = arachidonic acid; LNA = linolenic acid; DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid.
a–e Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Data are presented as means of 3 replicates per dietary treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Effects of dietary replacement of fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on dorsal muscle fatty acid composition (mg/g lipid) of Epinephelus coioides in a 56-d feeding period.1
| Fatty acids | Diets | Pooled SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% PO | 25% PO | 50% PO | 75% PO | 100% PO | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| C14:0 | 23.4a | 20.1b | 15.3c | 13.4cd | 11.0d | 1.258 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C16:0 | 132.3a | 138.9ab | 140.8ab | 144.7a | 150.5a | 1.909 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| C18:0 | 41.5 | 40.7 | 39.6 | 40.1 | 38.9 | 0.333 | 0.281 | 0.244 | 0.415 |
| C19:0 | 24.4 | 23.1 | 23.6 | 25.5 | 25.8 | 1.132 | 0.356 | 0.189 | 0.307 |
| C21:0 | 3.5ab | 4.6a | 3.1ab | 2.2b | 2.0b | 0.296 | 0.020 | 0.020 | 0.034 |
| C22:0 | 1.3c | 1.1b | 1.1bc | 1.0cd | 0.9d | 0.030 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| ΣSFA | 225.9 | 229.1 | 225.6 | 229.2 | 231.1 | 1.384 | 0.267 | 0.132 | 0.219 |
| C16:1 | 35.2a | 29.2b | 21.8c | 17.0d | 15.5d | 2.028 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| C17:1 | 2.8a | 2.4ab | 2.1bc | 1.9bc | 1.6c | 0.111 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C18:1n-9 (OA) | 131.8c | 165.5d | 186.4c | 218.8b | 237.4a | 9.872 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C20:1 | 7.3a | 5.4b | 6.6a | 6.5a | 4.4b | 2.028 | <0.001 | 0.216 | 0.319 |
| C24:1 | 4.6a | 4.2ab | 4.0ab | 3.7ab | 3.3b | 0.170 | 0.034 | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| ΣMUFA | 182.2c | 207.3b | 219.5ab | 247.7b | 261.8a | 7.474 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| C18:2n-6 (LA) | 101.4e | 113.1d | 122.2c | 133.6b | 146.7a | 3.331 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
| C18:3n-6 | 8.1a | 6.5b | 4.3c | 3.1c | 1.2d | 0.651 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C20:2n-6 | 15.4a | 13.2b | 5.6c | 3.9d | 2.6e | 1.347 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C20:3n-6 | 0.8a | 0.7ab | 0.7ab | 0.7ab | 0.6b | 0.032 | 0.028 | 0.042 | 0.205 |
| C20:4n-6 (ARA) | 6.5a | 5.6ab | 5.2bc | 4.4c | 2.7d | 0.348 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Σn-6 PUFA | 132.7e | 139.7bc | 137.9bc | 146.2b | 153.8a | 2.168 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.034 |
| C18:3n-3 (LNA) | 17.3d | 13.5b | 14.6c | 11.4d | 8.6e | 0.725 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.041 |
| C20:5n-3 (EPA) | 37.4a | 30.6b | 23.1c | 18.2d | 14.6e | 2.235 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C22:5n-3 | 11.8a | 9.3b | 8.3b | 6.9c | 5.6c | 0.562 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | 85.0a | 69.6b | 62.8b | 47.5c | 37.1d | 4.396 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Σn-3 PUFA | 151.1a | 122.7b | 106.3c | 84.1d | 66.4e | 7.067 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Σn-3 LC-PUFA | 132.5a | 108.7b | 95.4c | 72.5d | 57.8e | 6.956 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| DHA/EPA ratio | 2.27 | 2.33 | 2.60 | 2.61 | 2.54 | 0.056 | 0.191 | 0.141 | 0.212 |
| n-3/n-6 PUFA ratio | 1.13a | 0.86b | 0.80b | 0.59c | 0.47d | 0.064 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
FO = fish oil; PO = palm oil; SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid; LC-PUFA = long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids; OA = oleic acid; LA = linoleic acid; ARA = arachidonic acid; LNA = linolenic acid; DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid.
a – e Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Data are presented as means of 3 replicates per dietary treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.
Effects of dietary replacement of fish oil (FO) with palm oil (PO) on relative mRNA expression levels of the genes related to lipid metabolism in the liver of Epinephelus coioides in a 56-d feeding period.1
| Genes | Diets | Pooled SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0%PO | 25%PO | 50%PO | 75%PO | 100% PO | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| 0.12b | 0.23b | 0.17b | 0.23b | 0.83a | 0.041 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.011 | |
| 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.26 | 1.04 | 0.055 | 0.057 | 0.276 | 0.269 | |
| 0.66b | 0.62b | 0.57b | 0.63b | 0.99a | 0.038 | 0.001 | 0.048 | 0.132 | |
| 1.51 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.133 | 0.362 | 0.009 | 0.033 | |
| 0.37d | 0.79c | 0.40d | 1.15b | 2.23a | 0.108 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 1.24a | 0.37c | 0.51c | 0.77b | 1.11a | 0.063 | <0.001 | 0.083 | <0.001 | |
| 0.71b | 0.64b | 1.04a | 1.06a | 1.58a | 0.069 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.012 | |
| 0.95b | 0.64b | 0.49b | 0.61b | 1.75a | 0.072 | <0.001 | 0.313 | 0.028 | |
| 1.20a | 0.30b | 0.23b | 0.18b | 0.18b | 0.072 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 0.56b | 0.80ab | 0.86ab | 1.33a | 2.01a | 0.182 | <0.001 | 0.030 | 0.070 | |
| 0.87b | 2.48b | 0.98b | 2.30b | 12.98a | 0.657 | <0.001 | 0.029 | 0.020 | |
| 1.75a | 1.81a | 1.19b | 0.75b | 0.75b | 0.100 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 1.21a | 1.01ab | 0.73ab | 1.43a | 0.34b | 0.112 | 0.014 | 0.323 | 0.029 | |
FO = fish oil; PO = palm oil; FAS = fatty acid synthase; ACC = acetyl-CoA carboxylase; G6PD = glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; SCD = stearoyl-CoA desaturase; LPL = lipoprotein lipase; HSL = hormone-sensitive lipase; PPARα = peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α; CPT = carnitine palmitoyl transferase; ATGL = adipose triglyceride lipase; SREBP-1c = sterol-regulatory element-binding protein-1c; Δ6FAD = delta-6 fatty acyl desaturase; FABP = fatty acid binding proteins; ELOVL = elongase of very long-chain fatty acids.
a – c Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Data are presented as means of 3 replicates per dietary treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Palm oil replaced 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of FO in the control diet, respectively.