| Literature DB >> 34976945 |
Kranthi Kumar Gangu1,2, Sreekantha B Jonnalagadda2.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as versatile candidates of interest in heterogeneous catalysis. Recent research and developments with MOFs positively endorse their role as catalysts in generating invaluable organic compounds. To harness the full potential of MOFs in value-added organic transformation, a comprehensive look at how these materials are likely to involve in the catalytic processes is essential. Mainstays of MOFs such as metal nodes, linkers, encapsulation materials, and enveloped structures tend to produce capable catalytic active sites that offer solutions to reduce human efforts in developing new organic reactions. The main advantages of choosing MOFs as reusable catalysts are the flexible and robust skeleton, regular porosity, high pore volume, and accessible synthesis accompanied with cost-effectiveness. As hosts for active metals, sole MOFs, modified MOFs, and MOFs have made remarkable advances as solid catalysts. The extensive exploration of the MOFs possibly led to their fast adoption in fabricating new biological molecules such as pyridines, quinolines, quinazolinones, imines, and their derivatives. This review covers the varied MOFs and their catalytic properties in facilitating the selective formation of the product organic moieties and interprets MOF's property responsible for their elegant performance.Entities:
Keywords: catalytic active sites; green principles; heterogeneous catalysis; metal-organic frameworks (MOF); reusability; value-added organic transformations
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976945 PMCID: PMC8718437 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.747615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
SCHEME 1Perspective view of review enlightens the organic transformation with MOFs as solid heterogeneous catalysts.
FIGURE 1Cartoon diagram of two approaches for the integration of catalytic species into MOF pores. [Reproduced from Ref. (Gong et al., 2020)].
FIGURE 2Different available strategies for the fabrication of MOF composites/hybrids. (A) Strategies for fabrication of MOF-metal NP composites including ship-in-bottle, bottle-around-ship, and one-pot synthesis. Cyan, inorganic nodes of MOFs; gray, organic linkers; orange, metal precursors or NPs; red, stabilizing agents. (B) Schematic representation of immobilization of the AuNi nanoparticles by an MIL-101 matrix using DSM combined with a liquid-phase CCR strategy. (C) Schematic illustration for the synthesis of the Cu2O@ZIF-8 composite. (D) Incorporation of Pt NPs in a UiO-66 MOF by means of an in situ one-step protocol with kinetic modulation by H2/acetic acid (top) and with no modulation (bottom). [Reproduced from Ref. (Chen and Xu, 2019)].
Different MOFs and their composites as heterogeneous catalysts in organic transformations discussed in this review.
| MOF/Solid catalyst | References number | Catalytic activity | Organic reaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| [(Cu(L)2·(H2O)2·(NO3)2]n (1) Where L = 4-(5-methyl-3-pyridine)-1,2,4-triazole |
| Cu (II) metal sites- Lewis acid catalysis | Conversion of CO2 into cyclic carbonates |
| Pd@Cu-BDC/Py-SI (2) |
| The Schiff base Pd complex molecules on the cage of Pd@Cu-BDC/Py-SI | Production of biaryls over the Suzuki reaction |
| [Cu2(CN)2(BPY)] (3) CuCl2 as a metal source,4,4′-bipyridine (BPY) as bridged ligand |
| Cu(I) sites in the MOF facilitate catalysis | cyclization of tertiary propargylic alcohols with CO2 |
| Au@Cu(II)-MOF (4) Cu(OAc)2 and pyridyl substituted diketonate ligand |
| Cu(II)-the framework is a valuable platform for supporting and stabilizing Au NPs | Knoevenagel condensation and benzyl alcohol oxidation |
| Cd (II)-MOF (5) 1,2-diphenylethane-1,2-dionebisisonicotinylhydrazone (H2DDIH) as dihydrazone linker |
| water coordinated Cd(II) ions act as active Lewis acidic catalytic sites | Knoevenagel reaction |
| MOF-199 (6) copper nitrate and 1,3,5‐benzenetricarboxylic acid |
| Cu(II) catalytic active sites | Preparation of 2,2,4‐trimethyl‐1,2‐dihydroquinolines reacting different anilines and ketones |
| [Fe3(BTC) (EDB)212.27H2O] (7) BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate and EDB2- = 4,4′-ethynylenedibenzoate |
| The iron catalyzed decarboxylation of phenylacetic acid is occurred promptly | Preparatio of 2-phenylquinazolin-4(3H)-one from Phenylacetic acid and 2-aminobenzamide |
| Cu2+ captured into UiO-66–(COOH)2 (8) (Cu@UiO-1, Cu@UiO-2 and Cu@UiO-3) |
| Copper catalytic sites enables the catalytic reaction in Cu@UiO-1 more cheaply | olefin epoxidation |
| UiO-66(Ce) (9) |
| Ce4+ ions as active sites in UiO-66(Ce) | Aerobic oxidation of benzyl amines |
| Ni@MIL-125(Ti)-NH2 (10) |
| Schiff base nickel (II) complex acts as active catalytic site | ethylene oligomerization |
| L-proline grafted [Zr6O6(OH)2 (tdc)4(CH3COO)2], DUT-67-pro (11) |
| L-proline chiral catalytic sites | cyclohexanone to trans-β-nitrostyrene |
| IRMOF-8 (12) Zinc nitrate tetrahydrate and 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid |
| Lewis acidic sites | Friedel–Crafts acylation |
| Adenine functionalized Mn-MOF-74 (13) |
| Lewis acidic-basic active sites | Synthesis of cyclic carbonates |
| [Al (OH) (hfipbb)] (14), AlPF-1 [In (O2C2H4)0.5 (hfipbb)] (15),InPF-11β and [Ga (OH) (hfipbb)] [16], GaPF-1 |
| Lewis acid and base sites in the catalyst | Strecker reaction |
| MIL-101 (17) |
| sulfonic and Cr(III) sites collaboratively to enhance the activity | oxidation of cyclohexene |
FIGURE 3Schematic representation of the synthesis of Cu (II)-MOF and HAuCl4 [Reproduced from Ref. (Wang et al., 2016)].
FIGURE 4Zr-based MOF Using Cu2+ ions [Reproduced form Ref. (Zhao et al., 2018b)].
FIGURE 5Synthetic routes of Ni@MOF [Reproduced from Ref. (Chen et al., 2020)].
FIGURE 6Adenine-assisted synthesis of functionalized F-Mn-MOF-74 heterogeneous catalyst [Reproduced from Ref. (Feng et al., 2020)].
FIGURE 7Possible reaction routes of cyclohexene oxidation. [Reproduced from Ref. (Sun and Gao, 2020)].