| Literature DB >> 34976899 |
Yolandi Breet1,2, Ashleigh Craig1, Wayne Smith1,2, Shani Botha-Le Roux1,2, Lebo F Gafane-Matemane1,2, Sanette Brits1,2, Johannes M van Rooyen1,2, Henner Hanssen3, Ruan Kruger1,2.
Abstract
Background: Cross-talk between the macro-and microvasculature is considered an important contributor to target organ damage. Previous findings were predominantly in adult populations and investigation into this mechanism in children may provide insight into the development of early adverse vascular changes. Whether any ethnic differences in cross-talk is evident, also remains to be determined. Objective: To determine whether retinal microvascular diameters are associated with large artery stiffness in young children and whether ethnic differences are evident. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: arterial stiffness; arterio-venous ratio; central retinal artery equivalent; central retinal vein equivalent; ethnicity; pediatric
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976899 PMCID: PMC8716632 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.795301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
General characteristics of children stratified according to ethnicity.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 7.46 ± 0.967 | 7.58 ± 0.809 | 0.96 |
| Sex, boys ( | 213 (42.0) | 163 (52.6) |
|
|
| |||
| Waist circumference (cm) | 53.16 ± 5.86 | 58.3 ± 7.89 |
|
| Body height (cm) | 121 ± 7.46 | 127 ± 6.99 |
|
| Body weight (kg) | 23.6 ± 5.50 | 27.1 ± 6.48 |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 15.9 ± 2.40 | 16.7 ± 6.48 |
|
| BMI z-score | −0.182 (−2.13; 1.75) | 2.41 (−1.43; 2.06) |
|
|
| |||
| Brachial systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 101 ± 10 | 104 ± 10 | 0.44 |
| Brachial diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 65 ± 8 | 64 ± 7 |
|
| Brachial mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 80 ± 8 | 80 ± 7 |
|
| Central systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 96 ± 10 | 96 ± 8 | 0.61 |
| Central diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 65 ± 8 | 65 ± 8 | 0.36 |
| Pulse wave velocity (m/s) | 4.42 ± 0.328 | 4.53 ± 0.295 |
|
| Stroke volume (ml) | 46.9 ± 7.99 | 51.2 ± 9.56 |
|
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 4.10 ± 0.557 | 4.37 ± 0.646 |
|
| Total vascular resistance (mmHg/ml/s) | 1.23 ± 0.133 | 1.19 ± 0.153 |
|
|
| |||
| Central retinal artery equivalent (MU) | 198 ± 14.1 | 200 ± 15.0 |
|
| Central retinal vein equivalent (MU) | 241 ± 15.2 | 230 ± 15.6 |
|
| Arterio-venous ratio | 0.825 ± 0.063 | 0.870 ± 0.057 |
|
Values are arithmetic mean ± standard deviation or geometric mean (5th and 95th percentiles) for logarithmically transformed variables.
Bold values denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Brachial blood pressure measures were adjusted for age, sex, and body height.
Pulse wave velocity was adjusted for age, sex, and mean arterial pressure.
Central retinal artery equivalent was additionally adjusted for central retinal vein equivalent and vice versa.
n, number of participants; MU, measuring units.
Figure 1Single regression analyses pulse wave velocity with retinal calibers stratified by ethnicity.
Partial correlations between large artery stiffness and retinal calibers in children stratified according to ethnicity.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Pulse wave velocity (m/s) | ||||||
Variables included in the models were age and sex. Pulse wave velocity was adjusted for mean arterial pressure. Central retinal artery equivalent was additionally adjusted for central retinal vein equivalent and vice versa.
Bold values denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).