| Literature DB >> 34976447 |
Wang Shir Yen1,2, Foo Siu Wan2, Jemaima Che Hamzah1, Karen Khoo Kah Luen2.
Abstract
Objective To describe the epidemiology and to evaluate the visual outcome of open globe injury (OGI) cases in Hospital Pulau Pinang. Method A three-year retrospective study on OGI cases presenting to Hospital Pulau Pinang from January 2018 until December 2020. Result A total of 39 OGI cases (n=39) were included in this study. The average age of the patients was 34.9 ± 21.7 (mean ± standard deviation, SD). There were 33 males (84.6%) and six females (15.4%). In this study, 27 cases (69.2%) were Malaysians, while the remaining 12 cases (30.8%) were foreigners. OGI cases were mostly caused by occupational injuries (n=17, 43.6%) and domestic-related accidents (n=17, 43.6%). The mean initial VA (visual acuity) logMAR was 1.69 ± 0.98 (mean ± SD). Overall, the final VA improved to the mean VA logMAR of 1.04 ± 1.08 (mean ± SD). There was a significant positive correlation between initial VA and final VA logMAR (Spearman's rho = 0.6532, p <0.001). A negative linear correlation was found between calculated raw points of Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) and final VA logMAR (Spearman's rho = -0.7067, p <0.001). Conclusion Young adult males, foreign nationality, occupational injuries, and domestic-related accidents are risk factors of OGI. By uncovering the risk, we can take remedial actions to ensure better public health and clinical strategies to prevent and manage ocular trauma in the future. This study also highlights that initial VA and OTS are effective in predicting visual outcomes of OGI.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiology; ocular trauma score (ots); open globe injury; penang; visual outcome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976447 PMCID: PMC8678419 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Demographics and presenting ocular characteristics of open globe injury, n=39
SD = standard deviation; IOFB = intraocular foreign body; RD = retinal detachment; APD = afferent pupillary defect; OTS = Ocular Trauma Score; VA = visual acuity
| Demographics and Presenting Ocular Characteristics of Open Globe Injury | n (%) |
| Age, mean (SD) | 34.9 (21.75) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 33 (84.6) |
| Female | 6 (15.4) |
| Race | |
| Malay | 16(41.0) |
| Chinese | 8 (20.5) |
| Indian | 3 (7.7) |
| Foreigner | 12 (30.8) |
| Trauma eye | |
| Right | 16 (41.0) |
| Left | 23 (59.0) |
| Causes of injury | |
| Occupational injuries | 17 (43.6) |
| Domestic-related accidents | 17 (43.6) |
| Motor vehicle accidents | 4 (10.3) |
| Assault cases | 1 (2.6) |
| Time to injury presentation | |
| <24 hours | 28 (71.8) |
| 24 – 48 hours | 2 (5.1) |
| 48 – 96 hours | 6 (15.4) |
| >96 hours | 3 (7.7) |
| Types of open globe injury | |
| Rupture | 8 (20.5) |
| Penetrating | 28 (71.8) |
| IOFB | 3 (7.7) |
| Concomitant ocular problems at presentation | |
| Endophthalmitis | 1 (2.6) |
| RD | 4 (10.3) |
| Rupture | 8 (20.5) |
| APD | 5 (12.8) |
| Days of hospitalization, mean (SD) | 4.5 (2.87) |
| Mean OTS score (SD) | 71.1 (20.0) |
| OTS | |
| 1 | 3 (7.7) |
| 2 | 11 (28.2) |
| 3 | 13 (33.3) |
| 4 | 7 (17.9) |
| 5 | 5 12.8) |
| Mean Initial VA log MAR (SD) | 1.69 (0.98) |
| Mean Final VA log MAR (SD) | 1.04 (1.08) |
Relationship between causes of injury and gender
1 Fisher’s exact test
| Causes of injury | Gender | p-value1 | |
| Male, n (%) | Female, n (%) | ||
| Occupational injuries | 17 (51.5) | 0 | 0.028 |
| Domestic-related accidents | 11 (33.3) | 6 (100) | |
| Motor vehicle accidents | 4 (12.12) | 0 | |
| Assault cases | 1 (3.0) | 0 | |
Management of Open Globe Injury, n=39
IOFB = intraocular foreign body; AC = anterior chamber
| Type of management | n (%) |
| Primary ocular wall closure | |
| None | 1 (2.6) |
| Cornea and Limbus | 23 (58.9) |
| Sclera | 9 (23.1) |
| Corneo-sclera | 6 (15.4) |
| Lensectomy/ Phacoemulsification | 12 (30.8) |
| Primary Lensectomy/ Phacoemulsification | 6 (15.4) |
| Secondary Lensectomy/ Phacoemulsification | 6 (15.4) |
| Posterior Vitrectomy | 2 (5.1) |
| Removal of IOFB | 3 (7.7) |
| Intravitreal Antibiotic | 17 (43.6) |
| AC Washout | 6 (15.4) |
Initial and final VA by category
NPL= No perception of light; PL = perception of light; HM = hand movement
| Initial VA, n (%) | Final VA, n (%) | |
| NPL | 3 (7.8) | 5 (12.5) |
| PL/HM | 14 (35.9) | 5 (12.5) |
| 1/200-19/200 | 9 (23.1) | 2 (5.1) |
| 20/200-20/50 | 8 (20.5) | 8 (20.5) |
| ≥20/40 | 5 (12.8) | 19 (48.7) |
Figure 1Scatter plot showing the distribution of cases (n=39) according to the final VAlog MAR and initial VA logMAR (Spearman’s rho = 0.6532, p <0.001)
Figure 2Scatter plot showing the distribution of cases (n=39) according to the final VA log MAR and raw points of OTS (Spearman’s rho = -0.7067, p <0.001).
Percentage of the final VA by OTS category
NPL= No perception of light; PL = perception of light; HM = hand movement
| Raw points of OTS | OTS | NLP | PL/HM | 1/200-19/200 | 20-200-20/50 | ≥20/40 | Total |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| 0-44 | 1 | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (100.0) |
| 45-65 | 2 | 4 (36.4) | 4 (36.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (9.1) | 11 (100.0) |
| 66-80 | 3 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (7.7) | 1 (7.7) | 4 (30.8) | 7 (53.8) | 13 (100.0) |
| 81-91 | 4 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (100.0) | 7 (100.0) |
| 92-100 | 5 | 0 (0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1(20.0) | 4(80.0) | 5 (100.0) |