| Literature DB >> 34976329 |
Huiyu Duan1, Shenglong Xun1, Yusong Teng2, Gong Zhang3.
Abstract
Objective: This study uses statistics to analyze the diagnostic significance of ultrasonic exploration for rotator cuff injuries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976329 PMCID: PMC8716241 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4867850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Comparative analysis of the specificity and sensitivity of the two diagnostic methods for tendon injury.
| Result | Ultrasound inspection method | Arthroscopy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supraspinatus tendon tear | Subscapular tendon tear | Supraspinatus tendon tear | Subscapular tendon tear | |
| Specificity | 85/85 (100.00) | 30/30 (100.00) | 85/85 (100.00) | 30/30 (100.00) |
| Sensitivity | 25/45 (55.55) | 12/28 (42.80) | 40/45 (90.00) | 24/28 (85.70) |
Figure 1Two-dimensional ultrasound normal supraspinatus tendon.
Figure 2Two-dimensional ultrasound supraspinatus tendon injury.
Figure 3Two-dimensional ultrasound subscapular tendon injury.
Figure 4Intraoperative supraspinatus tendon arthroscopy.
Figure 5Intraoperative subscapular tendon arthroscopy.
Comparison of the inspection results of the two diagnostic methods.
| Positive | Negative | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound diagnosis | 95 | 5 | 100 |
| Arthroscopy | 95 | 5 | 100 |
Figure 6Image of the abnormal rotator cuff tendon. (a) Partial tear in the supraspinatus tendon. (b) Full -thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon. (c) Full -thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon. (d) Supraspinatus tendon cross-sectional calcification foci.