| Literature DB >> 34976115 |
Abstract
Healthy physical fitness is one of the hot topics discussed by scholars at home and abroad in recent years, and it is a key indicator for evaluating students' physical function and body shape. Aerobics, also known as bodybuilding, means that the body and health of students should have a better promotion effect, but in reality, many students found that after elective aerobics, body shape and health level basically did not improve, which is related to the setting of aerobics courses, especially the lack of physical training. Aerobics and other sports have common requirements in physical training, such as strength quality, speed quality, endurance quality, agility quality, and flexibility quality. This article is aimed at studying the impact of healthy physical fitness based on big data mining technology on the teaching of aerobics. On the basis of analyzing the process of data mining, the composition of healthy physical fitness, and the role of aerobics, it is used to test students in a certain university through experimental methods and statistical methods. Carry out aerobics teaching experiment, and compare and analyze the data measured by the experimental samples. The experimental results show that the use of healthy physical fitness in aerobics teaching can effectively promote the learning and improvement of aerobics skills.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976115 PMCID: PMC8716231 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9755214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Comparative analysis of test results of students' health and physical fitness index before experiment.
| Test items | Experimental class | Control class |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step experiment | 119 ± 10.36 | 118.27 ± 11.14 | 3.45 | >0.05 |
| Vital capacity | 3093.48 ± 824.32 | 3041.25 ± 812.65 | 4.997 | >0.05 |
| Sitting forward bending | 18.54 ± 7.62 | 18.63 ± 6.12 | 1.324 | >0.05 |
| Forearm grip | 26.524 ± 2.641 | 26.438 ± 2.84 | 0.33 | >0.05 |
| Sit-ups | 27.64 ± 5.147 | 27.851 ± 4.657 | 1.533 | >0.05 |
Figure 1Comparative analysis of test results of students' health and physical fitness index before experiment.
Comparative analysis of test results of students' health and physical fitness index after experiment.
| Test items | Experimental class | Control class |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step experiment | 113 ± 9.21 | 118.27 ± 11.14 | 3.483 | <0.05 |
| Vital capacity | 3524.26 ± 841.74 | 3041.25 ± 812.65 | 4.322 | <0.05 |
| Sitting forward bending | 25.45 ± 5.33 | 19.65 ± 4.82 | 1.324 | <0.05 |
| Forearm grip | 29.47 ± 2.35 | 26.43 ± 2.86 | 7.367 | <0.05 |
| Sit-ups | 33.54 ± 5.751 | 27.42 ± 46.812 | 6.274 | <0.05 |
Figure 2Comparative analysis of test results of students' health and physical fitness index after experiment.
Comparison of the results of aerobics skills test between the experimental class and the control class.
| Test subject | Maximum value | Minimum value | Average value |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental class | 85 | 53 | 72.98 | -5.08 | <0.01 |
| Control class | 81 | 51 | 68.24 |
Figure 3Comparison of the results of aerobics skills test between the experimental class and the control class.
Comparison of the results of aerobics skills test between male and female students in the experimental class and the control class.
| Test subject | Gender | Maximum value | Minimum value | Average value |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental class | Male | 79 | 53 | 69.96 | 4.58 | <0.01 |
| Control class | Male | 79 | 51 | 65.84 | ||
| Experimental class | Female | 85 | 56 | 76.76 | 3.02 | <0.05 |
| Control class | Female | 81 | 55 | 71.54 |
Figure 4Comparison of the results of aerobics skills test between male and female students in the experimental class and the control class.